* The only exception is that the flag -std=c++2a is still used not to break compatibility with older compilers (clang <= 9, gcc <= 9).
* Bump _LIBCPP_STD_VER for C++20 to 20 and use 21 for the future standard (C++2b).
That's a preparation step to add c++2b support to libc++.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93383
There were a couple of places where we needed to call the underlying
platform's aligned allocation/deallocation function. Instead of having
the same logic all over the place, extract the logic into a pair of
helper functions __libcpp_aligned_alloc and __libcpp_aligned_free.
The code in libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp looks like it could be
simplified after this change -- I purposefully did not simplify it
further to keep this change as straightforward as possible, since it
is touching very important parts of the library.
Also, the changes in libcxx/src/new.cpp and libcxxabi/src/stdlib_new_delete.cpp
are basically the same -- I just kept both source files in sync.
The underlying reason for this refactoring is to make it easier to support
platforms that provide aligned allocation through C11's aligned_alloc
function instead of posix_memalign. After this change, we'll only have
to add support for that in a single place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91379
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
Due to the need to support compilers that implement builtin operator
new/delete but not their align_val_t overloaded versions, there was a
lot of complexity. By assuming that a compiler that supports the builtin
new/delete operators also supports their align_val_t overloads, the code
can be simplified quite a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88301
We're technically not allowed by the Standard to call ::operator new in
constexpr functions like __libcpp_allocate. Clang doesn't seem to complain
about it, but GCC does.
This commit adds std::construct_at, and marks various members of
std::allocator_traits and std::allocator as constexpr. It also adds
tests and turns the existing tests into hybrid constexpr/runtime tests.
Thanks to Richard Smith for initial work on this, and to Michael Park
for D69803, D69132 and D69134, which are superseded by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364
Depend on the compiler to provide a correct implementation of
max_align_t. If __STDCPP_NEW_ALIGNMENT__ is missing and C++03 mode has
been explicitly enabled, provide a minimal fallback in <new> as
alignment of the largest primitive types.
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
This was previously committed as r372777 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372983
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372777
Summary:
This provides the `std::destroying_delete_t` declaration in C++2a and after. (Even when the compiler doesn't support the language feature).
However, the feature test macro `__cpp_lib_destroying_delete` is only defined when we have both language support and C++2a.
Reviewers: ldionne, ckennelly, serge-sans-paille, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: dexonsmith, riccibruno, christof, jwakely, jdoerfert, mclow.lists, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55840
llvm-svn: 361572
Summary:
On Windows we currently provide two separate ABI configurations. One which defers to `vcruntime` to provide the C++ runtime and another which doesn't.
Using `vcruntime` allows interoperability which programs compiled against the MSVC STL, and should be preferred whenever possible.
When deferring to `vcruntime` much of the ABI we provide changes. Including the layout of `<stdexcept>` types, their vtables, and how the linkage of their members.
This patch introduces the `_LIBCPP_ABI_VCRUNTIME` macro to denote this configuration. It also cleans up the existing configuration for using `vcruntime`.
This cleanup lays the groundwork for fixing a number of ABI and interoperability bugs in `<stdexcept>`.
Reviewers: thomasanderson, ldionne, smeenai
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: jdoerfert, libcxx-commits, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58942
llvm-svn: 355366
Summary:
For consistency, libc++ macros always start with _LIBCPP. This should
have no functionality change.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58558
llvm-svn: 354848
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
std::bad_array_length was added by n3467, but this never made it into C++.
This commit removes the definition of std::bad_array_length from the headers
AND from the shared library. See the comments in the ABI changelog for details
about the ABI implications of this change.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, dexonsmith, howard.hinnant, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54804
llvm-svn: 347903
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345281
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
There are two cases:
1. The library has all it needs to provide align_val_t and the
new/delete overloads needed to support aligned allocation.
2. The compiler has actually turned the language feature on.
There are times where libc++ needs to distinguish between the two.
This patch adds the additional macro
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_LIBRARY_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION which denotes when case (1)
does not hold. _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION is defined whenever
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_LIBRARY_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION is defined, or when the
compiler has not enabled the language feature.
Additionally this patch cleans up a number of other macros related
to detection of aligned allocation machinery.
llvm-svn: 344207
When we're using clang-cl and Microsoft's runtime implementation,
we don't provide align_val_t or aligned new/delete ourselves.
This patch updates the _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION macro
to reflect this.
llvm-svn: 343441
Summary:
The current code enables aligned allocation functions when compiling in C++17
and later. This is a problem because aligned allocation functions might not
be supported on the target platform, which leads to an error at link time.
Since r338934, Clang knows not to define __cpp_aligned_new when it's not
available on the target platform -- this commit takes advantage of that to
only use aligned allocation functions when they are available.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50344
llvm-svn: 339431
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
This patch fixes std::allocator, and more specifically, all users
of __libcpp_allocate and __libcpp_deallocate, to support over-aligned
types.
__libcpp_allocate/deallocate now take an alignment parameter, and when
the specified alignment is greater than that supported by malloc/new,
the aligned version of operator new is called (assuming it's available).
When aligned new isn't available, the old behavior has been kept, and the
alignment parameter is ignored.
This patch depends on recent changes to __builtin_operator_new/delete which
allow them to be used to call any regular new/delete operator. By using
__builtin_operator_new/delete when possible, the new/delete erasure optimization
is maintained.
llvm-svn: 328180
Patch from charlieio@outlook.com
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D42354
When the following command is used:
> clang-cl -std:c++17 -Iinclude\c++\v1 hello.cc c++.lib
An error occurred:
In file included from hello.cc:1:
In file included from include\c++\v1\iostream:38:
In file included from include\c++\v1\ios:216:
In file included from include\c++\v1\__locale:15:
In file included from include\c++\v1\string:477:
In file included from include\c++\v1\string_view:176:
In file included from include\c++\v1\__string:56:
In file included from include\c++\v1\algorithm:643:
In file included from include\c++\v1\memory:656:
include\c++\v1\new(165,29): error: redefinition of 'align_val_t'
enum class _LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS align_val_t : size_t { };
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.12.25827\include\vcruntime_new.h(43,16): note:
previous definition is here
enum class align_val_t : size_t {};
^
1 error generated.
vcruntime_new.h has defined align_val_t, libcxx need hide align_val_t.
This patch fixes that error.
llvm-svn: 324853
The vcruntime headers are hairy and clash with both libc++ headers
themselves and other libraries. libc++ normally deals with the clashes
by deferring to the vcruntime headers and silencing its own definitions,
but for clients which don't want to depend on vcruntime headers, it's
desirable to support the opposite, i.e. have libc++ provide its own
definitions.
Certain operator new/delete replacement scenarios are not currently
supported in this mode, which requires some tests to be marked XFAIL.
The added documentation has more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38522
llvm-svn: 315234
This reverts commit r306310.
r306310 causes clang to reject a call to an aligned allocation or
deallocation function if it is not implemented in the standard library
of the deployment target. This is not the desired behavior when users
have defined their own aligned functions.
rdar://problem/32664169
llvm-svn: 306859
attribute.
This is needed because older versions of libc++ do not have these
operators. If users target an older deployment target and try to compile
programs in which these operators are explicitly called, the compiler
will complain.
The following is the list of minimum deployment targets for the four
OSes:
macosx: 10.13
ios: 11.0
tvos: 11.0
watchos: 4.0
rdar://problem/32664169
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34556
llvm-svn: 306310
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
This recommits r294707 with additional fixes. The main difference is
libc++ now correctly builds without any ABI library.
exception.cpp is a bloody mess. It's full of confusing #ifdef branches for
each different ABI library we support, and it's getting unmaintainable.
This patch breaks down exception.cpp into multiple different header files,
roughly one per implementation. Additionally it moves the definitions of
exceptions in new.cpp into the correct implementation header.
This patch also removes an unmaintained libc++abi configuration.
This configuration may still be used by Apple internally but there
are no other possible users. If it turns out that Apple still uses
this configuration internally I will re-add it in a later commit.
See http://llvm.org/PR31904.
llvm-svn: 294730
exception.cpp is a bloody mess. It's full of confusing #ifdef branches for
each different ABI library we support, and it's getting unmaintainable.
This patch breaks down exception.cpp into multiple different header files,
roughly one per implementation. Additionally it moves the definitions of
exceptions in new.cpp into the correct implementation header.
This patch also removes an unmaintained libc++abi configuration.
This configuration may still be used by Apple internally but there
are no other possible users. If it turns out that Apple still uses
this configuration internally I will re-add it in a later commit.
See http://llvm.org/PR31904.
llvm-svn: 294707
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
r292564 disabled the aligned new/delete overloads on platforms without
posix_memalign. Unfortunately that patch also disabled the align_val_t
definition in C++17 as well.
This patch causes align_val_t to be exposed in C++17 regardless
of if we have the new/delete overloads.
llvm-svn: 292582
Summary:
This patch disables the aligned new/delet overloads on Apple platforms without `posix_memalign`. This fixes libc++.dylib build regressions on such platforms.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31448.
This patch should also be merged into the 4.0 release branch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, dexonsmith, jeremyhu
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28931
llvm-svn: 292564
Summary:
On Windows the identifier `__deallocate` is defined as a macro by one of the Windows system headers. Previously libc++ worked around this by `#undef __deallocate` and generating a warning. However this causes the WIN32 version of `__threading_support` to always generate a warning on Windows. This is not OK.
This patch renames all usages of `__deallocate` internally as to not conflict with the macro.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, majnemer, rnk, rsmith, smeenai, compnerd
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28426
llvm-svn: 291332
Fix a typo in the conditional. Caught by going through list of removed
symbols when building with hidden visibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26825
llvm-svn: 287309
Louis Dionne