Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Cong Hou 94710840fb Allow X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E to be reversed.
Currently, AnalyzeBranch() fails non-equality comparison between floating points
on X86 (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23875). This is because this
function can modify the branch by reversing the conditional jump and removing
unconditional jump if there is a proper fall-through. However, in the case of
non-equality comparison between floating points, this can turn the branch
"unanalyzable". Consider the following case:

jne.BB1
jp.BB1
jmp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...

AnalyzeBranch() will reverse "jp .BB1" to "jnp .BB2" and then "jmp .BB2" will be
removed:

jne.BB1
jnp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...

However, AnalyzeBranch() cannot analyze this branch anymore as there are two
conditional jumps with different targets. This may disable some optimizations
like block-placement: in this case the fall-through behavior is enforced even if
the fall-through block is very cold, which is suboptimal.

Actually this optimization is also done in block-placement pass, which means we
can remove this optimization from AnalyzeBranch(). However, currently
X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E are not reversible: there is no defined
negation conditions for them.

In order to reverse them, this patch defines two new CondCode X86::COND_E_AND_NP
and X86::COND_P_AND_NE. It also defines how to synthesize instructions for them.
Here only the second conditional jump is reversed. This is valid as we only need
them to do this "unconditional jump removal" optimization.


Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11393

llvm-svn: 264199
2016-03-23 21:45:37 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer d477e9e378 Revert "Allow X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E to be reversed."
and "Add a missing test case for r258847."

This reverts commit r258847, r258848. Causes miscompilations and backend
errors.

llvm-svn: 258927
2016-01-27 12:44:12 +00:00
Cong Hou 551a57f797 Allow X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E to be reversed.
Currently, AnalyzeBranch() fails non-equality comparison between floating points
on X86 (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23875). This is because this
function can modify the branch by reversing the conditional jump and removing
unconditional jump if there is a proper fall-through. However, in the case of
non-equality comparison between floating points, this can turn the branch
"unanalyzable". Consider the following case:

jne.BB1
jp.BB1
jmp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...

AnalyzeBranch() will reverse "jp .BB1" to "jnp .BB2" and then "jmp .BB2" will be
removed:

jne.BB1
jnp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...

However, AnalyzeBranch() cannot analyze this branch anymore as there are two
conditional jumps with different targets. This may disable some optimizations
like block-placement: in this case the fall-through behavior is enforced even if
the fall-through block is very cold, which is suboptimal.

Actually this optimization is also done in block-placement pass, which means we
can remove this optimization from AnalyzeBranch(). However, currently
X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E are not reversible: there is no defined
negation conditions for them.

In order to reverse them, this patch defines two new CondCode X86::COND_E_AND_NP
and X86::COND_P_AND_NE. It also defines how to synthesize instructions for them.
Here only the second conditional jump is reversed. This is valid as we only need
them to do this "unconditional jump removal" optimization.


Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11393

llvm-svn: 258847
2016-01-26 20:08:01 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 945a660cbc Change the fast-isel-abort option from bool to int to enable "levels"
Summary:
Currently fast-isel-abort will only abort for regular instructions,
and just warn for function calls, terminators, function arguments.
There is already fast-isel-abort-args but nothing for calls and
terminators.

This change turns the fast-isel-abort options into an integer option,
so that multiple levels of strictness can be defined.
This will help no being surprised when the "abort" option indeed does
not abort, and enables the possibility to write test that verifies
that no intrinsics are forgotten by fast-isel.

Reviewers: resistor, echristo

Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7941

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 230775
2015-02-27 18:32:11 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka 89d187b387 Reapply [FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value (r215594).
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.

llvm-svn: 216011
2014-08-19 19:44:10 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka 790bacf232 Revert several FastISel commits to track down a buildbot error.
This reverts:
r215595 "[FastISel][X86] Add large code model support for materializing floating-point constants."
r215594 "[FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value."
r215593 "[FastISel][X86] Emit more efficient instructions for integer constant materialization."
r215591 "[FastISel][AArch64] Make use of the zero register when possible."
r215588 "[FastISel] Let the target decide first if it wants to materialize a constant."
r215582 "[FastISel][AArch64] Cleanup constant materialization code. NFCI."

llvm-svn: 215673
2014-08-14 19:56:28 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka ba8b79e932 [FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value.
llvm-svn: 215594
2014-08-13 22:22:17 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka aa60209311 [FastISel][X86] Optimize predicates and fold CMP instructions.
This optimizes predicates for certain compares, such as fcmp oeq %x, %x to
fcmp ord %x, %x. The latter one is more efficient to generate.

The same optimization is applied to conditional branches.

llvm-svn: 211126
2014-06-17 21:55:43 +00:00