This fixes PEI as previously described, but correctly handles the case where
the instruction defining the virtual register to be scavenged is the first in
the block. Arnold provided me with a bugpoint-reduced test case, but even that
seems too large to use as a regression test. If I'm successful in cleaning it
up then I'll commit that as well.
Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
llvm-svn: 178919
During LTO, the target options on functions within the same Module may
change. This would necessitate resetting some of the back-end. Do this for X86,
because it's a Friday afternoon.
llvm-svn: 178917
Reverting because this breaks one of the LTO builders. Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
llvm-svn: 178916
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
llvm-svn: 178845
For now, just save the compile time since the ConvergingScheduler
heuristics don't use this analysis. We'll probably enable it later
after compile-time investigation.
llvm-svn: 178822
On certain architectures we can support efficient vectorized version of
instructions if the operand value is uniform (splat) or a constant scalar.
An example of this is a vector shift on x86.
We can efficiently support
for (i = 0 ; i < ; i += 4)
w[0:3] = v[0:3] << <2, 2, 2, 2>
but not
for (i = 0; i < ; i += 4)
w[0:3] = v[0:3] << x[0:3]
This patch adds a parameter to getArithmeticInstrCost to further qualify operand
values as uniform or uniform constant.
Targets can then choose to return a different cost for instructions with such
operand values.
A follow-up commit will test this feature on x86.
radar://13576547
llvm-svn: 178807
There is a difference for FORM_ref_addr between DWARF 2 and DWARF 3+.
Since Eric is against guarding DWARF 2 ref_addr with DarwinGDBCompat, we are
still in discussion on how to handle this.
The correct solution is to update our header to say version 4 instead of version
2 and update tool chains as well.
rdar://problem/13559431
llvm-svn: 178806
the target system.
It was hard-coded to 4 bytes before. I can't get llvm to generate a
ref_addr on a reasonably sized testing case.
rdar://problem/13559431
llvm-svn: 178722
For this we need to use a libcall. Previously LLVM didn't implement
libcall support for frem, so I've added it in the usual
straightforward manner. A test case from the bug report is included.
llvm-svn: 178639
The new instruction scheduling models provide information about the
number of cycles consumed on each processor resource. This makes it
possible to estimate ILP more accurately than simply counting
instructions / issue width.
The functions getResourceDepth() and getResourceLength() now identify
the limiting processor resource, and return a cycle count based on that.
This gives more precise resource information, particularly in traces
that use one resource a lot more than others.
llvm-svn: 178553
This is helps on architectures where i8,i16 are not legal but we have byte, and
short loads/stores. Allowing us to merge copies like the one below on ARM.
copy(char *a, char *b, int n) {
do {
int t0 = a[0];
int t1 = a[1];
b[0] = t0;
b[1] = t1;
radar://13536387
llvm-svn: 178546
We would also like to merge sequences that involve a variable index like in the
example below.
int index = *idx++
int i0 = c[index+0];
int i1 = c[index+1];
b[0] = i0;
b[1] = i1;
By extending the parsing of the base pointer to handle dags that contain a
base, index, and offset we can handle examples like the one above.
The dag for the code above will look something like:
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i8 load %index))))
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i32 add (i32 signextend (i8 load %index))
(i32 1)))))
The code that parses the tree ignores the intermediate sign extensions. However,
if there is a sign extension it needs to be on all indexes.
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (add (i8 load %index)
(i8 1))))
vs
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i32 add (i32 signextend (i8 load %index))
(i32 1)))))
radar://13536387
llvm-svn: 178483
immediate in a register. I don't believe this should ever fail, but I see no
harm in trying to make this code bullet proof.
I've added an assert to ensure my assumtion is correct. If the assertion fires
something is wrong and we should fix it, rather then just silently fall back to
SelectionDAG isel.
llvm-svn: 178305
This is a follow-up to r178073 (which should actually make target-customized
spilling work again).
I still don't have a regression test for this (but it would be good to have
one; Thumb 1 and Mips16 use this callback as well).
Patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 178137
As pointed out by Richard Sandiford, my recent updates to the register
scavenger broke targets that use custom spilling (because the new code assumed
that if there were no valid spill slots, than spilling would be impossible).
I don't have a test case, but it should be possible to create one for Thumb 1,
Mips 16, etc.
llvm-svn: 178073
The previous algorithm could not deal properly with scavenging multiple virtual
registers because it kept only one live virtual -> physical mapping (and
iterated through operands in order). Now we don't maintain a current mapping,
but rather use replaceRegWith to completely remove the virtual register as
soon as the mapping is established.
In order to allow the register scavenger to return a physical register killed
by an instruction for definition by that same instruction, we now call
RS->forward(I) prior to eliminating virtual registers defined in I. This
requires a minor update to forward to ignore virtual registers.
These new features will be tested in forthcoming commits.
llvm-svn: 178058
- Handle the case where the result of 'insert_subvect' is bitcasted
before 'extract_subvec'. This removes the redundant insertf128/extractf128
pair on unaligned 256-bit vector load/store on vectors of non 64-bit integer.
llvm-svn: 177945
For instance, following transformation will be disabled:
x + x + x => 3.0f * x;
The problem of these transformations is that it introduces a FP constant, which
following Instruction-Selection pass cannot handle.
Reviewed by Nadav, thanks a lot!
rdar://13445387
llvm-svn: 177933
Performing this check unilaterally prevented us from generating FMAs when the incoming IR contained illegal vector types which would eventually be legalized to underlying types that *did* support FMA.
For example, an @llvm.fmuladd on an OpenCL float16 should become a sequence of float4 FMAs, not float4 fmul+fadd's.
NOTE: Because we still call the target-specific profitability hook, individual targets can reinstate the old behavior, if desired, by simply performing the legality check inside their callback hook. They can also perform more sophisticated legality checks, if, for example, some illegal vector types can be productively implemented as FMAs, but not others.
llvm-svn: 177820
177774 broke the lld-x86_64-darwin11 builder; error:
error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'size_type' (aka 'unsigned long')
for (SI = 0; SI < Scavenged.size(); ++SI)
~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fix this by making SI also unsigned.
llvm-svn: 177780
This patch lets the register scavenger make use of multiple spill slots in
order to guarantee that it will be able to provide multiple registers
simultaneously.
To support this, the RS's API has changed slightly: setScavengingFrameIndex /
getScavengingFrameIndex have been replaced by addScavengingFrameIndex /
isScavengingFrameIndex / getScavengingFrameIndices.
In forthcoming commits, the PowerPC backend will use this capability in order
to implement the spilling of condition registers, and some special-purpose
registers, without relying on r0 being reserved. In some cases, spilling these
registers requires two GPRs: one for addressing and one to hold the value being
transferred.
llvm-svn: 177774
This reverts commit 06091513c283c863296f01cc7c2e86b56bb50d02.
The code is obviously wrong, but the trivial fix causes
inefficient code generation on X86. Somebody with more
knowledge of the code needs to take a look here.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 177529
A node's ordering is only propagated during legalization if (a) the new node does
not have an ordering (is not a CSE'd node), or (b) the new node has an ordering
that is higher than the node being legalized.
llvm-svn: 177465
Nadav Rotem