- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
Suggest moving the following erroneous attrib list (based on location)
[[]] struct X;
to
struct [[]] X;
Additionally, added a fixme for the current implementation that diagnoses misplaced attributes to consider using the newly introduced diagnostic (that I think is more user-friendly).
llvm-svn: 321449
This implements [dcl.modules.export] from the C++ Modules TS, which lets a module re-export another module with the "export import" syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40270
llvm-svn: 318744
Summary:
The crash occurs when the first token after a preamble is a macro
expansion.
Fixed by moving replayPreambleConditionalStack from Parser into
Preprocessor. It is now called right after the predefines file is
processed.
Reviewers: erikjv, bkramer, klimek, yvvan
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36872
llvm-svn: 311330
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
We were incorrectly setting PrevTokLocation to the first token in the
annotation token instead of the last when consuming it. To fix this without
adding a complex switch to the hot path through ConsumeToken, we now have a
ConsumeAnnotationToken function for consuming annotation tokens in addition
to the other Consume*Token special case functions.
llvm-svn: 303372
This switches from the prototype syntax in P0273R0 ('module' and 'module
implementation') to the consensus syntax 'export module' and 'module'.
In passing, drop the "module declaration must be first" enforcement, since EWG
seems to have changed its mind on that.
llvm-svn: 301056
This commit teaches Clang to recognize editor placeholders that are produced
when an IDE like Xcode inserts a code-completion result that includes a
placeholder. Now when the lexer sees a placeholder token, it emits an
'editor placeholder in source file' error and creates an identifier token
that represents the placeholder. The parser/sema can now recognize the
placeholders and can suppress the diagnostics related to the placeholders. This
ensures that live issues in an IDE like Xcode won't get spurious diagnostics
related to placeholders.
This commit also adds a new compiler option named '-fallow-editor-placeholders'
that silences the 'editor placeholder in source file' error. This is useful
for an IDE like Xcode as we don't want to display those errors in live issues.
rdar://31581400
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32081
llvm-svn: 300667
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
as identifiers in Objective-C++
This commit improves the 'expected identifier' errors that are presented when a
C++ keyword is used as an identifier in Objective-C++ by mentioning that this is
a C++ keyword in the diagnostic message. It also improves the error recovery:
the parser will now treat the C++ keywords as identifiers to prevent unrelated
parsing errors.
rdar://20626062
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26503
llvm-svn: 299950
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
llvm-svn: 299470
and the nature of a declaration
This commit adds an external_source_symbol attribute to Clang. This attribute
specifies that a declaration originates from an external source and describes
the nature of that source. This attribute will be used to improve IDE features
like 'jump-to-definition' for mixed-language projects or project that use
auto-generated code.
rdar://30423368
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29819
llvm-svn: 296649
We model deduction-guides as functions with a new kind of name that identifies
the template whose deduction they guide; the bulk of this patch is adding the
new name kind. This gives us a clean way to attach an extensible list of guides
to a class template in a way that doesn't require any special handling in AST
files etc (and we're going to need these functions we come to performing
deduction).
llvm-svn: 294266
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
This flag serves no purpose other than to prevent us walking through a type to
check whether it contains an 'auto' specifier; this duplication of information
is error-prone, does not appear to provide any performance benefit, and will
become less practical once we support C++1z deduced class template types and
eventually constrained types from the Concepts TS.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 291737
Added a map to associate types and declarations with extensions.
Refactored existing diagnostic for disabled types associated with extensions and extended it to declarations for generic situation.
Fixed some bugs for types associated with extensions.
Allow users to use pragma to declare types and functions for supported extensions, e.g.
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION the_new_extension_name : begin
// declare types and functions associated with the extension here
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION the_new_extension_name : end
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21698
llvm-svn: 289979
import can't appear here" diagnostic if an already-visible module is textually
entered (because we have the module map but not the AST file) within a
function/namespace scope.
llvm-svn: 288737
Fix a crash-on-invalid.
When parsing type arguments and protocols,
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() calls ParseTypeName(), which tries to
find matching tokens for '[', '(', etc whenever they appear among potential
type names. If unmatched, ParseTypeName() yields a tok::eof token stream. This
leads to crashes since the parsing at this point is not expected to go beyond
the param list closing '>'.
Fix that by properly handling tok::eof in
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() callers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23852
rdar://problem/25063557
llvm-svn: 281383
into ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal() (which is called by
MaybeParseMicrosoftAttributes()), so that the attributes can be stored in
the DeclSpec. No behavior change yet, part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280574
The comment starting with "ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition -" is above
a function called ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal. Fix the comment by not
mentioning a function name, like the style guide requests nowadays. No behavior
change.
llvm-svn: 280572
r280133. Original commit message:
C++ Modules TS: driver support for building modules.
This works as follows: we add --precompile to the existing gamut of options for
specifying how far to go when compiling an input (-E, -c, -S, etc.). This flag
specifies that an input is taken to the precompilation step and no further, and
this can be specified when building a .pcm from a module interface or when
building a .pch from a header file.
The .cppm extension (and some related extensions) are implicitly recognized as
C++ module interface files. If --precompile is /not/ specified, the file is
compiled (via a .pcm) to a .o file containing the code for the module (and then
potentially also assembled and linked, if -S, -c, etc. are not specified). We
do not yet suppress the emission of object code for other users of the module
interface, so for now this will only work if everything in the .cppm file has
vague linkage.
As with the existing support for module-map modules, prebuilt modules can be
provided as compiler inputs either via the -fmodule-file= command-line argument
or via files named ModuleName.pcm in one of the directories specified via
-fprebuilt-module-path=.
This also exposes the -fmodules-ts cc1 flag in the driver. This is still
experimental, and in particular, the concrete syntax is subject to change as
the Modules TS evolves in the C++ committee. Unlike -fmodules, this flag does
not enable support for implicitly loading module maps nor building modules via
the module cache, but those features can be turned on separately and used in
conjunction with the Modules TS support.
llvm-svn: 280134
This works as follows: we add --precompile to the existing gamut of options for
specifying how far to go when compiling an input (-E, -c, -S, etc.). This flag
specifies that an input is taken to the precompilation step and no further, and
this can be specified when building a .pcm from a module interface or when
building a .pch from a header file.
The .cppm extension (and some related extensions) are implicitly recognized as
C++ module interface files. If --precompile is /not/ specified, the file is
compiled (via a .pcm) to a .o file containing the code for the module (and then
potentially also assembled and linked, if -S, -c, etc. are not specified). We
do not yet suppress the emission of object code for other users of the module
interface, so for now this will only work if everything in the .cppm file has
vague linkage.
As with the existing support for module-map modules, prebuilt modules can be
provided as compiler inputs either via the -fmodule-file= command-line argument
or via files named ModuleName.pcm in one of the directories specified via
-fprebuilt-module-path=.
This also exposes the -fmodules-ts cc1 flag in the driver. This is still
experimental, and in particular, the concrete syntax is subject to change as
the Modules TS evolves in the C++ committee. Unlike -fmodules, this flag does
not enable support for implicitly loading module maps nor building modules via
the module cache, but those features can be turned on separately and used in
conjunction with the Modules TS support.
llvm-svn: 280035
from p0273r0 approved by EWG). We'll eventually need to handle this from the
lexer as well, in order to disallow preprocessor directives preceding the
module declaration and to support macro import.
llvm-svn: 279196
The recent change implementing __final forgot to initialize a variable.
This was caught by the Memory Sanitizer.
Properly initialize the value to nullptr to ensure proper memory reads.
Patch by Erich Keane!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22970
llvm-svn: 277206
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
Aaron Ballman