If the access relation's domain is empty, the access will never be
executed. We can just remove it.
We only remove write accesses. Partial read accesses are not yet
supported and instructions in the statement might require the
llvm::Value holding the read's result to be defined.
llvm-svn: 308830
Print a statement's instruction on dump() regardless of
-polly-print-instructions. dump() is supposed to be used in the debugger
only and never in regression tests. While debugging, get all the
information we have and we are not bound to break anything. For non-dump
purposes of print, forward the setting of -polly-print-instructions as
parameters.
Some calls to print() had to be changed because the
PollyPrintInstructions setting is only available in ScopInfo.cpp.
In ScheduleOptimizer.cpp, dump() was used in regression tests.
That's not what dump() is for.
The print parameter "PrintInstructions" will also be useful for an
explicit print SCoP pass in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 308746
Use a mark-and-sweep algorithm to find and remove unused instructions
and MemoryAccesses. This is useful in particular to remove scalar
writes that are never used anywhere. A scalar write in a loop induces
a write-after-write dependency that stops the loop iterations to be
rescheduled. Such writes can be a result of previous transformations
such as DeLICM and operand tree forwarding.
It adds a new class VirtualInstruction that represents an instruction in
a particular statement. At the moment an instruction can only belong to
the statement that represents a BasicBlock. In the future, instructions
can be in one of multiple statements representing a BasicBlock
(Nandini's work), in different statements than its BasicBlock would
indicate, and even multiple statements at once (by forwarding operand
trees). It also integrates nicely with the VirtualUse class.
ScopStmt::contains(Instruction*) currently uses the instruction's parent
BasicBlock to check whether it contains the instruction. It will need to
check the actual statement list when one of the aforementioned features
become possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35656
llvm-svn: 308626
Summary:
This makes code more readable and allows to reuse this functionality in
the future at other places.
Suggested-by Michael Kruse in post-commit review of r307660.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, bollu, gareevroman, efriedma, huihuiz, sebpop, simbuerg
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35585
llvm-svn: 308435
Iterate through memory accesses in execution order (first all implicit reads,
then explicit accesses, then implicit writes).
In the test case this caused an implicit load to be handled as if it was loaded
after the write. That is, the value being written before it is available.
This fixes llvm.org/PR33323
llvm-svn: 304810
Instead of relying on these functions to be part of the isl C++ bindings, we
just define this functionality independently. This allows us to use isl C++
bindings that do not contain LLVM specific functionality.
llvm-svn: 303503
- auto + decltype + template use was not inferrable in
`Transform/Simplify.cpp accessesInOrder`.
- changed code to explicitly construct required vector instead of using
higher order iterator helpers.
- Failing compiler spec:
Apple LLVM version 7.3.0 (clang-703.0.31)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
llvm-svn: 303039
Removal of overwritten writes currently encompasses all the cases
of the identical write removal.
There is an observable behavioral change in that the last, instead
of the first, MemoryAccess is kept. This should not affect the
generated code, however.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33143
llvm-svn: 302987
Remove memory writes that are overwritten by later writes. This works
for StoreInsts:
store double 21.0, double* %A
store double 42.0, double* %A
scalar writes at the end of a statement and mixes of these.
Multiple writes can be the result of DeLICM, which might map multiple
writes to the same location when it knows that these do no conflict
(for instance because they write the same value). Such writes
interfere with pattern-matched optimization such as gemm and may not
get removed by other LLVM passes after code generation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33142
llvm-svn: 302986
After DeLICM, it is possible to have two writes of the same value to
the same location in the same statement when it determined that those
writes do not conflict (write the same value).
Teach -polly-simplify to remove one of the writes. It interferes with
the pattern matching of matrix-multiplication kernels and also seem
to not be optimized away by LLVM.
The algorthm is simple, has O(n^2) behaviour (n = max number of
MemoryAccesses in a statement) and only matches the most obvious cases,
but seem to be enough to pattern-match Boost ublas gemm.
Not handled cases include:
- StoreInst instructions (a.k.a. explicit writes), since the value might
be loaded or overwritten between the two stores.
- PHINode, especially LCSSA, when the PHI value matches with on other's.
- Partial writes (in preparation)
llvm-svn: 302805
This new pass removes unnecessary accesses and writes. It currently
supports 2 simplifications, but more are planned.
It removes write accesses that write a loaded value back to the location
it was loaded from. It is a typical artifact from DeLICM. Removing it
will get rid of bogus dependencies later in dependency analysis.
It also removes statements without side-effects. ScopInfo already
removes these, but the removal of unnecessary writes can result in
more side-effect free statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30820
llvm-svn: 297473
Michael Kruse