look into the current scope for anything that could start a
nested-names-specifier. These results are ranked worse than any of the
results actually found in the lexical scope.
Perform a little more pruning of the result set, eliminating
constructors, __va_list_tag, and any duplication of declarations in
the result set. For the latter, implemented
NamespaceDecl::getCanonicalDecl.
llvm-svn: 82231
will provide the names of various enumerations currently
visible. Introduced filtering of code-completion results when we build
the result set, so that we can identify just the kinds of declarations
we want.
This implementation is incomplete for C++, since we don't consider
that the token after the tag keyword could start a
nested-name-specifier.
llvm-svn: 82222
when running the analyzer on real projects. We'll keep the change to
AnalysisManager.cpp in r82198 so that -fobjc-gc analyzes code
correctly in both GC and non-GC modes, although this may emit two
diagnostics for each bug in some cases (a better solution will come
later).
llvm-svn: 82201
pruning of diagnostics that may be emitted multiple times. This is
accomplished by adding FoldingSet profiling support to PathDiagnostic,
and then having BugReporter record what diagnostics have been issued.
This was motived to a serious bug introduced by moving the
'divide-by-zero' checking outside of GRExprEngine into a separate
'Checker' class. When analyzing code using the '-fobjc-gc' option, a
given function would be analyzed twice, but the second time various
"internal checks" would be disabled to avoid emitting multiple
diagnostics (e.g., "null dereference") for the same issue. The
problem is that such checks also effect path pruning and don't just
emit diagnostics. This resulted in an assertion failure involving a
real divide-by-zero in some analyzed code where we would get an
assertion failure in APInt because the 'DivZero' check was disabled
and didn't prune the logic that resulted in the divide-by-zero in the
analyzer.
The implemented solution is somewhat of a hack, and may not perform
extremely well. This will need to be cleaned up over time.
As a regression test, 'misc-ps.m' has been modified so that its tests
are run using -fobjc-gc to test this diagnostic pruning behavior.
llvm-svn: 82198
essence, code completion is triggered by a magic "code completion"
token produced by the lexer [*], which the parser recognizes at
certain points in the grammar. The parser then calls into the Action
object with the appropriate CodeCompletionXXX action.
Sema implements the CodeCompletionXXX callbacks by performing minimal
translation, then forwarding them to a CodeCompletionConsumer
subclass, which uses the results of semantic analysis to provide
code-completion results. At present, only a single, "printing" code
completion consumer is available, for regression testing and
debugging. However, the design is meant to permit other
code-completion consumers.
This initial commit contains two code-completion actions: one for
member access, e.g., "x." or "p->", and one for
nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "std::". More code-completion actions
will follow, along with improved gathering of code-completion results
for the various contexts.
[*] In the current -code-completion-dump testing/debugging mode, the
file is truncated at the completion point and EOF is translated into
"code completion".
llvm-svn: 82166
This fixes some bad -O0 codegen and the unnecessary clearing of al on entry to objc_msgSend for most message sends.
<rdar://problem/7102824> [irgen] unnecessary xorb on calls to objc_msgSend on x86_64
llvm-svn: 82118
This still isn't perfect, but I believe it is conservatively accurate at marking decls which IRgen needs to see, while still keeping the "deserialization footprint" on Cocoa.h.
llvm-svn: 82112
This is something of a hack, since whether the reader actually did this depends on the "isConsumerInterestedIn" predicate. I think we need to rework how this works, but I need to discuss with Doug.
llvm-svn: 82111
Anders Carlsson