Summary:
This patch (on top of the previous two (https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899) complete the compiler-rt side of the the Solaris
sanitizer port.
It contains the following sets of changes:
* For the time being, the port is for 32-bit x86 only, so reject the various tests on
x86_64.
* When compiling as C++, <setjmp.h> resp. <iso/setjmp_iso.h> only declares
_setjmp and _longjmp inside namespace std.
* MAP_FILE is a Windows feature. While e.g. Linux <sys/mman.h> provides a
no-op compat define, Solaris does not.
* test/asan/TestCases/Posix/coverage.cc was initially failing like this:
/vol/gcc/src/llvm/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/scripts/sancov.py: 4 files merged; 2 PCs total
rm: cannot remove '/var/gcc/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/I386SunOSConfig/TestCases/Posix/Output/coverage': Invalid argument
Further digging revealed that the rm was trying to remove the running test's working
directory which failed as observed. cd'ing out of the dir before let the test pass.
* Two tests needed a declaration of alloca. I've now copied the existing code from
test/asan/TestCases/alloca_constant_size.cc, but it may be more profitable and
maintainable to have a common testsuite header where such code is collected.
* Similarly, Solaris' printf %p format doesn't include the leading 0x.
* In test/asan/TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c, I had to undef __EXTENSIONS__
(predefined by clang for no apparent reason) to avoid conflicting declarations
for memalign.
* test/ubsan/TestCases/Float/cast-overflow.cpp has different platform dependent
ways to define BYTE_ORDER and friends. Why not just use __BYTE_ORDER__ and
friends as predefined by clang and gcc?
Patch by Rainer Orth.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40900
llvm-svn: 322635
Summary:
Export aligned new/delete to make dynamic runtimes work again.
Remove all valid new/delete cases from ASan test, there's a test in
common for that.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41548
llvm-svn: 321394
Summary:
Providing aligned new/delete implementations to match ASan.
Unlike ASan, MSan and TSan do not perform any additional checks
on overaligned memory, hence no sanitizer specific tests.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41532
llvm-svn: 321365
Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
The original attempt, r319525 was reverted in r319526 due
to the failures in compiler-rt standalone builds.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319575
This reverts commit r319525.
This change has introduced a problem with the Lit tests build for compiler-rt using Gold: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/6047/steps/test%20standalone%20compiler-rt/logs/stdio
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py:101: fatal: unable to parse config file '/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg', traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py", line 88, in load_from_path
exec(compile(data, path, 'exec'), cfg_globals, None)
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg", line 37, in <module>
if root.host_os not in ['Linux'] or not is_gold_linker_available():
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg", line 27, in is_gold_linker_available
stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 390, in __init__
errread, errwrite)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1024, in _execute_child
raise child_exception
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
llvm-svn: 319529
Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319525
This is a very poorly named feature. I think originally it meant to cover linux only, but the use of it in msan
seems to be about any aarch64 platform. Anyway, this change should be NFC on everything except Android.
llvm-svn: 315389
Summary:
Enable check-cfi and check-ubsan on Android.
Check-ubsan includes standalone and ubsan+asan, but not tsan or msan.
Cross-dso cfi tests are disabled for now.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, pcc
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38608
llvm-svn: 315105
Summary:
This prevents the confusion when there are similarly named tests in
different configurations (like in test/sanitizer_common).
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38526
llvm-svn: 315011
This test can't pass on MIPS64 due to the lack of versioned interceptors
for asan and company. The interceptors bind to the earlier version of
sem_init rather than the latest version. For MIPS64el this causes an
accidental pass while MIPS64 big endian fails due reading back a
different 32bit word to what sem_init wrote when the test is corrected
to use 64bit atomics.
llvm-svn: 314100
Summary:
Part of https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/637
Standalone ubsan needs signal and sigaction handlers and interceptors.
Plugin mode should rely on parent tool.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37895
llvm-svn: 314052
Summary:
With the recent move of `android_commands` to `sanitizer_common`, some things
have to be updated with regard to Scudo on Android.
Notably:
- `config.android` is dealt with in the common code
- `config.compile_wrapper` can be prepended to allow for the use of the android
commands
- `SCUDO_OPTIONS` must be passed with the environment when running a test
- `preinit.cpp` fails with some API levels, not sure why, I will have to dig
into this later.
Note that `check-scudo` is not enabled yet in the bots. It's all local testing
for now until everything looks good.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37990
llvm-svn: 313561
Kamil Rytarowski