Summary:
Some passes may open up opportunities for optimizations, leaving empty
lifetime start/end ranges. For example, with the following code:
void foo(char *, char *);
void bar(int Size, bool flag) {
for (int i = 0; i < Size; ++i) {
char text[1];
char buff[1];
if (flag)
foo(text, buff); // BBFoo
}
}
the loop unswitch pass will create 2 versions of the loop, one with
flag==true, and the other one with flag==false, but always leaving
the BBFoo basic block, with lifetime ranges covering the scope of the for
loop. Simplify CFG will then remove BBFoo in the case where flag==false,
but will leave the lifetime markers.
This patch teaches InstCombine to remove trivially empty lifetime marker
ranges, that is ranges ending right after they were started (ignoring
debug info or other lifetime markers in the range).
This fixes PR24598: excessive compile time after r234581.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13305
llvm-svn: 249018
Summary:
The instructions SeenExprs records may be deleted during rewriting.
FindClosestMatchingDominator should ignore these deleted instructions.
Fixes PR24301.
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: grosser, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13315
llvm-svn: 248983
Summary:
Without this patch, the memory manager would call `mprotect` on every memory
region it ever allocated whenever it wanted to finalize memory (i.e. not just
the ones it just allocated). This caused terrible performance problems for
long running memory managers. In one particular compile heavy julia benchmark,
we were spending 50% of time in `mprotect` if running under MCJIT.
Fix this by splitting allocated memory blocks into those on which memory
permissions have been set and those on which they haven't and only running
`mprotect` on the latter.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13156
llvm-svn: 248981
The custom code produces incorrect results if later reassociated.
Since r221657, on x86, vNi32 uitofp is lowered using an optimized
sequence:
movdqa LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = [65535, ...]
pand %xmm0, %xmm1
por LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm1 ## [0x4b000000, ...]
psrld $16, %xmm0
por LCPI0_2(%rip), %xmm0 ## [0x53000000, ...]
addps LCPI0_3(%rip), %xmm0 ## [float -5.497642e+11, ...]
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
Since r240361, the machine combiner opportunistically reassociates
2-instruction sequences (with -ffast-math). In the new code sequence,
the ADDPS' are eligible. In isolation, for simple examples (without
reassociable users), this makes no performance difference (the goal
being to enable reassociation of longer chains).
In the trivial example (just one uitofp), the reassociation doesn't
happen, because (I think) it would require the emission of a separate
movaps for a constantpool load (instead of folding it into addps).
However, when we have multiple uitofp sequences, and the constantpool
loads are CSE'd earlier, the machine combiner can do the reassociation.
When the ADDPS' are reassociated, the resulting sequence isn't correct
anymore, as we'd be adding large (2**39) constants with comparatively
smaller values (~2**23). Given that two of the three inputs are powers
of 2 larger than 2**16, and that ulp(2**39) == 2**(39-24) == 2**15,
the reassociated chain will produce 0 for any input in [0, 2**14[.
In my testing, it also produces wrong results for 99.5% of [0, 2**32[.
Avoid this by disabling the new lowering when -ffast-math. It does
mean that we'll get slower code than without it, but at least we
won't get egregiously incorrect code.
One might argue that, considering -ffast-math is all but meaningless,
uitofp producing wrong results isn't a compiler bug. But it really is.
Fixes PR24512.
...though this is really more of a workaround.
Ideally, we'd have some sort of Machine FMF, but that's a problem
that's not worth tackling until we do more with machine IR.
llvm-svn: 248965
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
Summary:
Given an array of i2 elements, 4 consecutive scalar loads will be lowered to
i8-sized loads and thus will access 4 consecutive bytes in memory. If we
vectorize these loads into a single <4 x i2> load, it'll access only 1 byte in
memory. Hence, we should prohibit vectorization in such cases.
PS: Initial patch was proposed by Arnold.
Reviewers: aschwaighofer, nadav, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13277
llvm-svn: 248943
Previously, the index was constrained to the size of the memory operation for
no apparent reason. This change removes that constraint so that we can form
pre-index instructions with any valid offset.
llvm-svn: 248931
Same strategy as simplifyInstructionsInBlock. ~1/3 less time
on my test suite. This pass doesn't have many in-tree users,
but getting rid of an O(N^2) worst case and making it cleaner
should at least make it a viable alternative to ADCE, since
it's now consistently somewhat faster.
llvm-svn: 248927
As Richard Barton observed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D12937#inline-107121
TargetParser in LLVM has insufficient support for ARMv6Z and ARMv6ZK.
In particular, there were no tests for TrustZone being supported in these
architectures.
The patch clears a FIXME: left by Saleem Abdulrasool in r201471, and fixes
his test case which hadn't really been testing what it was claiming to test.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13236
llvm-svn: 248921
Usually large blocks are not a problem. But if a large block (> 10k instructions)
contains many (potential) chains of vector instructions, and those chains are
spread over a wide range of instructions, then scheduling becomes a compile time problem.
This change introduces a limit for the accumulate scheduling region size of a block.
For real-world functions this limit will never be exceeded (it's about 10x larger than
the maximum value seen in the test-suite and external test suite).
llvm-svn: 248917
This patch teaches InstCombiner how to convert a SSSE3/AVX2 byte shuffle to a
builtin shuffle if the mask is constant.
Converting byte shuffle intrinsic calls to builtin shuffles can help finding
more opportunities for combining shuffles later on in selection dag.
We may end up with byte shuffles with constant masks as the result of inlining.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13252
llvm-svn: 248913
This commit changes the interface of the vld[1234], vld[234]lane, and vst[1234],
vst[234]lane ARM neon intrinsics and associates an address space with the
pointer that these intrinsics take. This changes, e.g.,
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32(i8*, i32)
to
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32.p0i8(i8*, i32)
This change ensures that address spaces are fully taken into account in the ARM
target during lowering of interleaved loads and stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985
llvm-svn: 248887
The XOP shifts just have logical/arithmetic versions and the left/right shifts are controlled by whether the value is positive/negative. Because of this I've added new X86ISD nodes instead of trying to force them to use the existing shift nodes.
Additionally Excavator cores (bdver4) support XOP and AVX2 - meaning that it should use the AVX2 shifts when it can and fall back to XOP in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8690
llvm-svn: 248878
to prevent setting a huge stride, because DATA_FORMAT has a different
meaning if ADD_TID_ENABLE is set.
This is a candidate for stable llvm 3.7.
Tested-and-Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 248858
The x64 ABI requires that epilogues do not contain code other than stack
adjustments and some limited control flow. However, we'd insert code to
initialize the return address after stack adjustments. Instead, insert
EAX/RAX with the current value before we create the stack adjustments in
the epilogue.
llvm-svn: 248839
Add support to the indexed instrprof reader and writer for the format
that will be used for value profiling.
Patch by Betul Buyukkurt, with minor modifications.
llvm-svn: 248833
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
The immediate in the load/store should be scaled by the size of the memory
operation, not the size of the register being loaded/stored. This change gets
us one step closer to forming LDPSW instructions. This change also enables
pre- and post-indexing for halfword and byte loads and stores.
llvm-svn: 248804
On some of our benchmarks this change shows about 50% compile time improvement without any noticeable performance difference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13248
llvm-svn: 248801
Tom Stellard