Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ana Pazos 05a6064385 Reapply: [RISCV] Set isAsCheapAsAMove for ADDI, ORI, XORI, LUI
This reapplies commit r352010 with RISC-V test fixes.

llvm-svn: 352237
2019-01-25 20:22:49 +00:00
Sameer AbuAsal eadce02741 [RISCV] Set CostPerUse for registers
Summary:
 Set CostPerUse higher for registers that are not used in the compressed
 instruction set. This will influence the greedy register allocator to reduce
 the use of registers that can't be encoded in 16 bit instructions. This
 affects register allocation even when compressed instruction isn't targeted,
 we see no major negative codegen impact.

Reviewers: asb

Reviewed By: asb

Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47039

llvm-svn: 333132
2018-05-23 21:34:30 +00:00
Alex Bradbury 6a53023b4e [RISCV] Set isReMaterializable on ADDI and LUI instructions
The isReMaterlizable flag is somewhat confusing, unlike most other instruction 
flags it is currently interpreted as a hint (mightBeRematerializable would be 
a better name). While LUI is always rematerialisable, for an instruction like 
ADDI it depends on its operands. TargetInstrInfo::isTriviallyReMaterializable 
will call TargetInstrInfo::isReallyTriviallyReMaterializable, which in turn 
calls TargetInstrInfo::isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric. We rely on 
the logic in the latter to pick out instances of ADDI that really are 
rematerializable.

The isReMaterializable flag does make a difference on a variety of test 
programs. The recently committed remat.ll test case demonstrates how stack 
usage is reduce and a unnecessary lw/sw can be removed. Stack usage in the 
Proc0 function in dhrystone reduces from 192 bytes to 112 bytes.

For the sake of completeness, this patch also implements 
RISCVRegisterInfo::isConstantPhysReg. Although this is called from a number of 
places, it doesn't seem to result in different codegen for any programs I've 
thrown at it. However, it is called in the rematerialisation codepath and it 
seems sensible to implement something correct here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46182

llvm-svn: 332617
2018-05-17 15:51:37 +00:00
Alex Bradbury f5800a2aa0 [RISCV] Add remat.ll test case
This test case demonstrates suboptimal codegen due to the fact that simple 
constants aren't recognised as rematerialisable.

llvm-svn: 331028
2018-04-27 11:50:30 +00:00