to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
For schedule models that don't use itineraries, checkCompleteness still checks that an instruction has a matching itinerary instead of skipping and going straight to matching the InstRWs. That doesn't seem to match what happens in TargetSchedule.cpp
This patch causes problems for a number of models that had been incorrectly flagged as complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43235
llvm-svn: 329280
Leave early ifcvt disabled for now since there are some
shader-db regressions.
This causes some immediate improvements, but could be better.
The cost checking that the pass does is based on critical path
length for out of order CPUs which we do not want so it skips out
on many cases we want.
llvm-svn: 293016
COPY was lacking a scheduling class, define it to avoid regressions in
the upcoming change to the bidirectional MachineScheduler. Approved by
tstellar on IRC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21540
llvm-svn: 273751
Summary:
This includes a hazard recognizer implementation to replace some of
the hazard handling we had during frame index elimination.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18602
llvm-svn: 268143
TableGen checks at compiletime that for scheduling models with
"CompleteModel = 1" one of the following holds:
- Is marked with the hasNoSchedulingInfo flag
- The instruction is a subclass of Sched
- There are InstRW definitions in the scheduling model
Typical steps necessary to complete a model:
- Ensure all pseudo instructions that are expanded before machine
scheduling (usually everything handled with EmitYYY() functions in
XXXTargetLowering).
- If a CPU does not support some instructions mark the corresponding
resource unsupported: "WriteRes<WriteXXX, []> { let Unsupported = 1; }".
- Add missing scheduling information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17747
llvm-svn: 262384
These were all using the default 32-bit VALU write class,
but the i64/f64 compares are half rate.
I'm not sure this is really correct, because they are still using
the write to VALU write class, even though they really write
to the SALU.
llvm-svn: 248582
These were marked as WriteSALU, which is low latency.
I'm guessing at the value to use, but it should probably
be considered the highest latency instruction.
I'm not sure this has any actual effect since hasSideEffects
probably is preventing any moving of these.
llvm-svn: 247060
Stanislav Mekhanoshin