Summary:
It is a common thing to loop over every `PHINode` in some `BasicBlock`
and change old `BasicBlock` incoming block to a new `BasicBlock` incoming block.
`replaceSuccessorsPhiUsesWith()` already had code to do that,
it just wasn't a function.
So outline it into a new function, and use it.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61013
llvm-svn: 359996
Summary:
There is `PHINode::getBasicBlockIndex()`, `PHINode::setIncomingBlock()`
and `PHINode::getNumOperands()`, but no function to replace every
specified `BasicBlock*` predecessor with some other specified `BasicBlock*`.
Clearly, there are a lot of places that could use that functionality.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61011
llvm-svn: 359995
This is a subset of the original commit from rL359879
which was reverted because it could crash when using the 'RemovedInstructions'
structure that enables delayed deletion of dead instructions. The motivating
compile-time win does not require that change though. We should get most of
that win from this change alone.
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359969
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
Also, we were restarting the iterator loops when doing the overflow intrinsic
transforms by marking the dominator tree for update. That was done to prevent
iterating over a removed instruction. But we can postpone the deletion using
the existing "RemovedInsts" structure, and that means we don't need to update
the DT.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359879
The simple case of:
```
int *callee();
void *caller(void *a) {
if (a == NULL)
return callee();
return a;
}
```
would generate a regular call instead of a tail call because we don't
look through the bitcast of the call to `callee` when duplicating the
return blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60837
llvm-svn: 359041
Summary:
A recent fix (r355751) caused a compile time regression because setting
the ModifiedDT flag in optimizeSelectInst means that each time a select
instruction is optimized the function walk in runOnFunction stops and
restarts again (which was needed to build a new DT before we started
building it lazily in r356937). Now that the DT is built lazily, a
simple fix is to just reset the DT at this point, rather than restarting
the whole function walk.
In the future other places that set ModifiedDT may want to switch to
just resetting the DT directly. But that will require an evaluation to
ensure that they don't otherwise need to restart the function walk.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits, xur
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59889
llvm-svn: 357111
Summary:
In r355512 CGP was changed to build the DominatorTree only once per
function traversal, to avoid repeatedly building it each time it was
accessed. This solved one compile time issue but introduced another. In
the second case, we now were building the DT unnecessarily many times
when we performed many function traversals (i.e. more than once per
function when running CGP because of changes made each time).
Change to saving the DT in the CodeGenPrepare object, and building it
lazily when needed. It is reset whenever we need to rebuild it.
The case that exposed the issue there are 617 functions, and we walk
them (i.e. execute the "while (MadeChange)" loop in runOnFunction) a
total of 12083 times (so previously we were building the DT 12083
times). With this patch we only build the DT 844 times (average of 1.37
times per function). We dropped the total time to compile this file from
538.11s without this patch to 339.63s with it.
There is still an issue as CGP is taking much longer than all other
passes even with this patch, and before a recent compiler release cut at
r355392 the total time to this compile was only 97 sec with a huge
reduction in CGP time. I suspect that one of the other recent changes to
CGP led to iterating each function many more times on average, but I
need to do some more investigation.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59696
llvm-svn: 356937
This is probably a bigger limitation than necessary, but since we don't have any evidence yet
that this transform led to real-world perf improvements rather than regressions, I'm making a
quick, blunt fix.
In the motivating x86 example from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41129
...and shown in the regression test, we want to avoid an extra instruction in the dominating
block because that could be costly.
The x86 LSR test diff is reversing the changes from D57789. There's no evidence that 1 version
is any better than the other yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59602
llvm-svn: 356665
This should be extended, but CGP does some strange things,
so I'm intentionally not changing the potential order of
any transforms yet.
llvm-svn: 356566
Summary:
This is a fix to bug 41052:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41052
While trying to optimize a memory instruction in a dead basic block, we end up registering the same phi for replacement twice. This patch avoids registering more than the first replacement candidate for a phi.
Patch by: JesperAntonsson
Reviewers: skatkov, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59358
llvm-svn: 356260
This is almost the same as:
rL355345
...and should prevent any potential crashing from examples like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41064
...although the bug was masked by:
rL355823
...and I'm not sure how to repro the problem after that change.
llvm-svn: 356218
Targets can potentially emit more efficient code if they know address
computations never overflow. For example ILP32 code on AArch64 (which only has
64-bit address computation) can ignore the possibility of overflow with this
extra information.
llvm-svn: 355926
Inserting an overflowing arithmetic intrinsic can increase register
pressure by producing two values at a point where only one is needed,
while the second use maybe several blocks away. This increase in
pressure is likely to be more detrimental on performance than
rematerialising one of the original instructions.
So, check that the arithmetic and compare instructions are no further
apart than their immediate successor/predecessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59024
llvm-svn: 355823
r44412 fixed a huge compile time regression but it needed ModifiedDT flag to be
maintained correctly in optimizations in optimizeBlock() and optimizeInst().
Function optimizeSelectInst() does not update the flag.
This patch propagates the flag in optimizeSelectInst() back to
optimizeBlock().
This patch also removes ModifiedDT in CodeGenPrepare class (which is not used).
The property of ModifiedDT is now recorded in a ref parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59139
llvm-svn: 355751
Summary:
In r354298 a DominatorTree construction was added via new function
combineToUSubWithOverflow, which was subsequently restructured into
replaceMathCmpWithIntrinsic in r354689. We are hitting a very long
compile time due to this repeated construction, once per math cmp in
the function.
We shouldn't need to build the DominatorTree more than once per
function, except when a transformation invalidates it. There is already
a boolean flag that is returned from these methods indicating whether
the DT has been modified. We can simply build the DT once per
Function walk in CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction, since any time a change
is made we break out of the Function walk and restart it.
I modified the code so that both replaceMathCmpWithIntrinsic as well as
mergeSExts (which was also building a DT) use the DT constructed by the
run method.
From -mllvm -time-passes:
Before this patch: CodeGen Prepare user time is 328s
With this patch: CodeGen Prepare user time is 21s
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58995
llvm-svn: 355512
The test is reduced from an example in the post-commit thread for:
rL354746
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190304/632396.html
While we must avoid dying here, the real question should be:
Why is non-canonical and/or degenerate code making it to CGP when
using the new pass manager?
llvm-svn: 355345
There's likely a missed IR canonicalization for at least 1 of these
patterns. Otherwise, we wouldn't have needed the pattern-matching
enhancement in D57516.
Note that -- unlike usubo added with D57789 -- the TLI hook for
this transform defaults to 'on'. So if there's any perf fallout
from this, targets should look at how they're lowering the uaddo
node in SDAG and/or override that hook.
The x86 diffs suggest that there's some missing pattern-matching
for forming inc/dec.
This should fix the remaining known problems in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40486https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
llvm-svn: 354746
We need to enhance the uaddo matching to handle special-cases
as seen in PR40486 and PR31754. That means we won't necessarily
have a def-use pattern, so we'll need to check dominance to
determine where to place the intrinsic (as we already do for
usubo). This preliminary patch is just rearranging the code,
so the planned follow-up to improve uaddo will be more clear.
llvm-svn: 354689
The motivating x86 cases for forming the intrinsic are shown in PR31754 and PR40487:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40487
..and those are shown in the IR test file and x86 codegen file.
Matching the usubo pattern is harder than uaddo because we have 2 independent values rather than a def-use.
This adds a TLI hook that should preserve the existing behavior for uaddo formation, but disables usubo
formation by default. Only x86 overrides that setting for now although other targets will likely benefit
by forming usbuo too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57789
llvm-svn: 354298
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
This patch improves code generation for some AArch64 ACLE intrinsics. It adds
support to CGP to duplicate and sink operands to their user, if they can be
folded into a target instruction, like zexts and sub into usubl. It adds a
TargetLowering hook shouldSinkOperands, which looks at the operands of
instructions to see if sinking is profitable.
I decided to add a new target hook, as for the sinking to be profitable,
at least on AArch64, we have to look at multiple operands of an
instruction, instead of looking at the users of a zext for example.
The sinking is done in CGP, because it works around an instruction
selection limitation. If instruction selection is not limited to a
single basic block, this patch should not be needed any longer.
Alternatively this could be done in the LoopSink pass, which tries to
undo LICM for instructions in blocks that are not executed frequently.
Note that we do not force the operands to sink to have a single user,
because we duplicate them before sinking. Therefore this is only
desirable if they really can be done for free. Additionally we could
consider the impact on live ranges later on.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
As for performance, we have internal code that uses intrinsics and can
be speed up by 10% by this change.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57377
llvm-svn: 353152
This is no-functional-change-intended although there could
be intermediate variations caused by a difference in the
debug info produced by setting that from the builder's
insertion point.
I'm updating the IR test file associated with this code just
to show that the naming differences from using the builder
are visible.
The motivation for adding a helper function is that we are
likely to extend this code to deal with other overflow ops.
llvm-svn: 353056
There are 2 changes visible here:
1. There's no reason to limit this transform based on number
of condition registers. That diff allows PPC to produce
slightly better (dot-instructions should be generally good)
code.
Note: someone that cares about PPC codegen might want to
look closer at that output because it seems like we could
still improve this.
2. We (probably?) should not bother trying to form uaddo (or
other overflow ops) when there's no target support for such
an op. This goes beyond checking whether the op is expanded
because both PPC and AArch64 show better codegen for standard
types regardless of whether the op is legal/custom.
llvm-svn: 353001
This is not truly NFC because we are bailing out without
a TLI now. That should not be a real concern though because
there should be a TLI in any real-world scenario.
That seems better than passing around a pointer and then
checking it for null-ness all over the place.
The motivation is to fix what appears to be an unintended
restriction on the uaddo transform -
hasMultipleConditionRegisters() shouldn't be reason to limit
the transform.
llvm-svn: 352988
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
This ensures that if we make it to the backend w/o lowering widenable_conditions first, that we generate correct code. Doing it in CGP - instead of isel - let's us fold control flow before hitting block local instruction selection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57473
llvm-svn: 352779
This change reverts r351626.
The changes in r351626 cause quadratic work in several cases. (See r351626 thread on llvm-commits for details.)
llvm-svn: 352722
This is meant to be used with clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
When 'true' is passed to this parameter, the intrinsic has the
potential to be folded into instructions that will be evaluated
at run time. When 'false', the objectsize intrinsic behaviour is
unchanged.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56761
llvm-svn: 352664
This patch makes sure that a debug value that is after the bitcast in
dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts() is also skipped.
The reduced test case is from SPEC-2006 on SystemZ.
Review: Vedant Kumar, Wolfgang Pieb
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57050
llvm-svn: 352462
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This reverts commit r351618.
Compiler RT + ASAN tests are failing for PowerPC. Not sure
how would I reproduce these on macOS, so reverting (again)
until I do.
llvm-svn: 351619
Make sure CodeGenPrepare doesn't emit multiple inttoptr instructions of
the same integer value while sinking address computations, but rather
CSEs them on the fly: excessive inttoptr's confuse SCEV into thinking
that related pointers have nothing to do with each other.
This problem blocks LoadStoreVectorizer from vectorizing some of the
loads / stores in a downstream target.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56838
llvm-svn: 351582
Creating the IR builder, then modifying the CFG, leads to an IRBuilder
where the BB and insertion point are inconsistent, so new instructions
have the wrong parent.
Modified an existing test because the test wasn't covering anything
useful (the "invoke" was not actually an invoke by the time we hit the
code in question).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55729
llvm-svn: 349693
This fixes PR39845. CodeGenPrepare employs a transactional model when
performing optimizations, i.e. it changes the IR to attempt an optimization
and rolls back the change when it finds the change inadequate. It is during
the rollback that references to locals were dropped from debug value
intrinsics. This patch reinstates debuginfo references during rollbacks.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55396
llvm-svn: 348896
This is a fix for PR39625 with improvement the compile time
by reducing the number of intermediate Phi nodes created.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54932
llvm-svn: 347839
Every Analysis pass has a get method that returns a reference of the Result of
the Analysis, for example, BlockFrequencyInfo
&BlockFrequencyInfoWrapperPass::getBFI(). I believe that
ProfileSummaryInfo::getPSI() is the only exception to that, as it was returning
a pointer.
Another change is renaming isHotBB and isColdBB to isHotBlock and isColdBlock,
respectively. Most methods use BB as the argument of variable names while
methods usually refer to Basic Blocks as Blocks, instead of BB. For example,
Function::getEntryBlock, Loop:getExitBlock, etc.
I also fixed one of the comments.
Patch by Rodrigo Caetano Rocha!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54669
llvm-svn: 347182
Summary:
D44571 changed SimplificationTracker to use SmallSetVector to keep phi nodes. As a result, when the number of phi nodes is large, the build time performance suffers badly. When building for power pc, we have a case where there are more than 600.000 nodes, and it takes too long to compile.
In this change, I partially revert D44571 to use SmallPtrSet, which does an acceptable job with any number of elements. In the original patch, having a deterministic iteration order was mentioned as a motivation, however I think it only applies to the nodes already matched in MatchPhiSet method, which I did not touch.
Reviewers: bjope, skatkov
Reviewed By: bjope, skatkov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54007
llvm-svn: 346710
QingShan Zhang