AMDGPU currently relies on global properties being set before
setTargetProperties is called. Existing targets like MIPS which rely on
setTargetProperties do not rely on the current behavior, so this patch
moves the call later in SetFunctionAttributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60967
llvm-svn: 359039
If macro "CHECK_X(x)" expands to something like "if (x != NULL) ...",
the "Assuming..." note no longer says "Assuming 'x' is equal to CHECK_X".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59121
llvm-svn: 359037
It now comes with a follow-up fix for the clients of this API
in clangd and clang-tidy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59977
llvm-svn: 359035
Summary:
The opt level was not being passed down to the ThinLTO backend when
invoked via clang (for distributed ThinLTO).
This exposed an issue where the new PM was asserting if the Thin or
regular LTO backend pipelines were invoked with -O0 (not a new issue,
could be provoked by invoking in-process *LTO backends via linker using
new PM and -O0). Fix this similar to the old PM where -O0 only does the
necessary lowering of type metadata (WPD and LowerTypeTest passes) and
then quits, rather than asserting.
Reviewers: xur
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, pcc
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61022
llvm-svn: 359025
Without this patch, APSInt inherits APInt::isNegative, which merely
checks the sign bit without regard to whether the type is actually
signed. isNonNegative and isStrictlyPositive call isNegative and so
are also affected.
This patch adjusts APSInt to override isNegative, isNonNegative, and
isStrictlyPositive with implementations that consider whether the type
is signed.
A large set of Clang OpenMP tests are affected. Without this patch,
these tests assume that `true` is not a valid argument for clauses
like `collapse`. Indeed, `true` fails APInt::isStrictlyPositive but
not APSInt::isStrictlyPositive. This patch adjusts those tests to
assume `true` should be accepted.
This patch also adds tests revealing various other similar fixes due
to APSInt::isNegative calls in Clang's ExprConstant.cpp and
SemaExpr.cpp: `++` and `--` overflow in `constexpr`, evaluated object
size based on `alloc_size`, `<<` and `>>` shift count validation, and
OpenMP array section validation.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, ABataev, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59712
llvm-svn: 359012
Summary:
The existing CTU mechanism imports `FunctionDecl`s where the definition is available in another TU. This patch extends that to VarDecls, to bind more constants.
- Add VarDecl importing functionality to CrossTranslationUnitContext
- Import Decls while traversing them in AnalysisConsumer
- Add VarDecls to CTU external mappings generator
- Name changes from "external function map" to "external definition map"
Reviewers: NoQ, dcoughlin, xazax.hun, george.karpenkov, martong
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Subscribers: Charusso, baloghadamsoftware, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, george.karpenkov, mgorny, whisperity, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46421
llvm-svn: 358968
A compilation warning was in my previous commit which broke the buildbot
because it is using `-Werror` for compilation. This patch fixes this
issue.
llvm-svn: 358955
Currently iterator checkers record comparison of iterator positions
and process them for keeping track the distance between them (e.g.
whether a position is the same as the end position). However this
makes some processing unnecessarily complex and it is not needed at
all: we only need to keep track between the abstract symbols stored
in these iterator positions. This patch changes this and opens the
path to comparisons to the begin() and end() symbols between the
container (e.g. size, emptiness) which are stored as symbols, not
iterator positions. The functionality of the checker is unchanged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53701
llvm-svn: 358951
Port mmintrin.h which include x86 MMX intrinsics implementation to PowerPC platform (using Altivec).
To make the include process correct, PowerPC's toolchain class is overrided to insert new headers directory (named ppc_wrappers) into the path. Basic test cases for several intrinsic functions are added.
The header is mainly developed by Steven Munroe, with contributions from Paul Clarke, Bill Schmidt, Jinsong Ji and Zixuan Wu.
Reviewed By: Jinsong Ji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59924
llvm-svn: 358949
When growing a body on a body farm, it's essential to use the same redeclaration
of the function that's going to be used during analysis. Otherwise our
ParmVarDecls won't match the ones that are used to identify argument regions.
This boils down to trusting the reasoning in AnalysisDeclContext. We shouldn't
canonicalize the declaration before farming the body because it makes us not
obey the sophisticated decision-making process of AnalysisDeclContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60899
llvm-svn: 358946
Stuffing invalid source locations (such as those in functions produced by
body farms) into path diagnostics causes crashes.
Fix a typo in a nearby function name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60808
llvm-svn: 358945
Implement cplusplus.SmartPtrModeling, a new checker that doesn't
emit any warnings but models methods of smart pointers more precisely.
For now the only thing it does is make `(bool) P` return false when `P`
is a freshly moved pointer. This addresses a false positive in the
use-after-move-checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60796
llvm-svn: 358944
This is a more generic solution; while the sanitizer support can be used
only for sanitizer instrumented builds, the multilib support can be used
to build other variants such as noexcept which is what we would like to use
in Fuchsia.
The name CMake target name uses the target name, same as for the regular
runtimes build and the name of the multilib, concatenated with '+'. The
libraries are installed in a subdirectory named after the multilib.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60926
llvm-svn: 358935
Previously, it was only documented by `-cc1 -help`, so people weren't
aware of it, as discussed in D60732.
Reviewed By: Charusso, NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60845
llvm-svn: 358917
Summary:
isClassMessage is an equivalent to isInstanceMessage for ObjCMessageExpr, but matches message expressions to classes.
isClassMethod and isInstanceMethod check whether a method declaration (or definition) is for a class method or instance method (respectively).
Contributed by @mywman!
Reviewers: benhamilton, klimek, mwyman
Reviewed By: benhamilton, mwyman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60920
llvm-svn: 358904
Summary:
* Removed a member that was only used during construction.
* Use range-based for iteration when accessing the result of the search.
* Require an `ObjCMethodDecl` reference upon construction of an
* Constify.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60850
llvm-svn: 358898
CWG 1691 changed the definition of the namespaces associated with a class
type or enumeration type.
For a class type, the associated namespaces are the innermost enclosing
namespaces of the associated classes. For an enumeration type, the associated
namespace is the innermost enclosing namespace of its declaration.
This also fixes CWG 1690 and CWG 1692.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60573
Reviewed By: rjmccall, rsmith
llvm-svn: 358882
The goal here is to exercise each rule in [basic.lookup.argdep] at least once.
These new tests expose what I believe are 2 issues:
1. CWG 1691 needs to be implemented (p2: [...] Its associated namespaces are
the innermost enclosing namespaces of its associated classes [...]) The
corresponding tests are adl_class_type::X2 and adl_class_type::X5.
2. The end of paragraph 2 ([...] Additionally, if the aforementioned set of
overloaded functions is named with a template-id, its associated classes
and namespaces also include those of its type template-arguments and its
template template-arguments.) is not implemented. Closely related, the
restriction on non-dependent parameter types in this same paragraph needs
to be removed. The corresponding tests are in adl_overload_set (both issues
are from CWG 997).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60570
Reviewed By: riccibruno, Quuxplusone
llvm-svn: 358881
Clang emits a warning when using a pure specifier =0 in a function definition
at class scope (a MS-specific construct), when using -fms-extensions.
However, to detect this, it was using FD->isCanonicalDecl() on function
declaration, which was also detecting out-of-class definition of member
functions of class templates. Fix this by using !FD->isOutOfLine() instead.
Fixes PR21334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29707
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Reviewers: rnk, riccibruno
Patch By: Rudy Pons
llvm-svn: 358849
Moved UninitializedObjectChecker from the 'alpha.cplusplus' to the
'optin.cplusplus' package.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58573
llvm-svn: 358797
Exposed by a related bug about visibility of default arguments of nested
templates - without the correct decl context, default template
parameters of variable templates nested in classes would have incorrect
visibility computed.
llvm-svn: 358796
The code is/was already correct for the case where a parameter is a
parameter of its enclosing lexical DeclContext (functions and classes).
But for other templates (alias and variable templates) they don't create
their own scope to be members of - in those cases, they parameter should
be considered visible if any definition of the lexical decl context is
visible.
[this should cleanup the failure on the libstdc++ modules buildbot]
[this doesn't actually fix the variable template case for a
secondary/compounding reason (its lexical decl context is incorrectly
considered to be the translation unit)]
Test covers all 4 kinds of templates with default args, including a
regression test for the still broken variable template case.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60892
llvm-svn: 358795
Summary:
This emits labels around heapallocsite calls and S_HEAPALLOCSITE debug
info in codeview. Currently only changes FastISel, so emitting labels still
needs to be implemented in SelectionDAG.
Reviewers: hans, rnk
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60800
llvm-svn: 358783
Previously, if the MSVC installation isn't detected properly, clang
will later just fail to execute link.exe.
This improves using clang in msvc mode on linux, where one intentionally
might not want to point clang to the MSVC installation itself (which
isn't executable as such), but where a link.exe named wine wrapper is
available in the path next to a cl.exe named wine wrapper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60094
llvm-svn: 358778
runtime.
target [teams distribute] simd costructs do not require full runtime for
the correct execution, we can run them without full runtime.
llvm-svn: 358766
Gold and ld on Linux already support saving stats, but the
infrastructure is missing on Darwin. Unfortunately it seems like the
configuration from lib/LTO/LTO.cpp is not used.
This patch adds a new LTOStatsFile option and adds plumbing in Clang to
use it on Darwin, similar to the way remarks are handled.
Currnetly the handling of LTO flags seems quite spread out, with a bunch
of duplication. But I am not sure if there is an easy way to improve
that?
Reviewers: anemet, tejohnson, thegameg, steven_wu
Reviewed By: steven_wu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60516
llvm-svn: 358753
TL;DR:
* Add checker and package options to the TableGen files
* Added a new class called CmdLineOption, and both Package and Checker recieved
a list<CmdLineOption> field.
* Added every existing checker and package option to Checkers.td.
* The CheckerRegistry class
* Received some comments to most of it's inline classes
* Received the CmdLineOption and PackageInfo inline classes, a list of
CmdLineOption was added to CheckerInfo and PackageInfo
* Added addCheckerOption and addPackageOption
* Added a new field called Packages, used in addPackageOptions, filled up in
addPackage
Detailed description:
In the last couple months, a lot of effort was put into tightening the
analyzer's command line interface. The main issue is that it's spectacularly
easy to mess up a lenghty enough invocation of the analyzer, and the user was
given no warnings or errors at all in that case.
We can divide the effort of resolving this into several chapters:
* Non-checker analyzer configurations:
Gather every analyzer configuration into a dedicated file. Emit errors for
non-existent configurations or incorrect values. Be able to list these
configurations. Tighten AnalyzerOptions interface to disallow making such
a mistake in the future.
* Fix the "Checker Naming Bug" by reimplementing checker dependencies:
When cplusplus.InnerPointer was enabled, it implicitly registered
unix.Malloc, which implicitly registered some sort of a modeling checker
from the CStringChecker family. This resulted in all of these checker
objects recieving the name "cplusplus.InnerPointer", making AnalyzerOptions
asking for the wrong checker options from the command line:
cplusplus.InnerPointer:Optimisic
istead of
unix.Malloc:Optimistic.
This was resolved by making CheckerRegistry responsible for checker
dependency handling, instead of checkers themselves.
* Checker options: (this patch included!)
Same as the first item, but for checkers.
(+ minor fixes here and there, and everything else that is yet to come)
There were several issues regarding checker options, that non-checker
configurations didn't suffer from: checker plugins are loaded runtime, and they
could add new checkers and new options, meaning that unlike for non-checker
configurations, we can't collect every checker option purely by generating code.
Also, as seen from the "Checker Naming Bug" issue raised above, they are very
rarely used in practice, and all sorts of skeletons fell out of the closet while
working on this project.
They were extremely problematic for users as well, purely because of how long
they were. Consider the following monster of a checker option:
alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=false
While we were able to verify whether the checker itself (the part before the
colon) existed, any errors past that point were unreported, easily resulting
in 7+ hours of analyses going to waste.
This patch, similarly to how dependencies were reimplemented, uses TableGen to
register checker options into Checkers.td, so that Checkers.inc now contains
entries for both checker and package options. Using the preprocessor,
Checkers.inc is converted into code in CheckerRegistry, adding every builtin
(checkers and packages that have an entry in the Checkers.td file) checker and
package option to the registry. The new addPackageOption and addCheckerOption
functions expose the same functionality to statically-linked non-builtin and
plugin checkers and packages as well.
Emitting errors for incorrect user input, being able to list these options, and
some other functionalies will land in later patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57855
llvm-svn: 358752
Ideally, there is no reason behind not being able to depend on checkers that
come from a different plugin (or on builtin checkers) -- however, this is only
possible if all checkers are added to the registry before resolving checker
dependencies. Since I used a binary search in my addDependency method, this also
resulted in an assertion failure (due to CheckerRegistry::Checkers not being
sorted), since the function used by plugins to register their checkers
(clang_registerCheckers) calls addDependency.
This patch resolves this issue by only noting which dependencies have to
established when addDependency is called, and resolves them at a later stage
when no more checkers are added to the registry, by which point
CheckerRegistry::Checkers is already sorted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59461
llvm-svn: 358750
Default RegionStore bindings represent values that can be obtained by loading
from anywhere within the region, not just the specific offset within the region
that they are said to be bound to. For example, default-binding a character \0
to an int (eg., via memset()) means that the whole int is 0, not just
that its lower byte is 0.
Even though memset and bzero were modeled this way, it didn't work correctly
when applied to simple variables. Eg., in
int x;
memset(x, 0, sizeof(x));
we did produce a default binding, but were unable to read it later, and 'x'
was perceived as an uninitialized variable even after memset.
At the same time, if we replace 'x' with a variable of a structure or array
type, accessing fields or elements of such variable was working correctly,
which was enough for most cases. So this was only a problem for variables of
simple integer/enumeration/floating-point/pointer types.
Fix loading default bindings from RegionStore for regions of simple variables.
Add a unit test to document the API contract as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60742
llvm-svn: 358722
Summary: The requires directive containing target related clauses must appear before any target region in the compilation unit.
Reviewers: ABataev, AlexEichenberger, caomhin
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60875
llvm-svn: 358709
On configurations with -Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers, the commit does not compile. This commit fixes the offending line.
Original Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60408
llvm-svn: 358705
Summary: This revision allows users to specify independent changes to multiple (related) sections of the input. Previously, only a single section of input could be selected for replacement.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60408
llvm-svn: 358697
Summary:
It's never set to true. Its only effect would be to set stdout to binary mode.
Hopefully we have better ways of doing this by now :-)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60871
llvm-svn: 358696
Summary:
This file defines the *Stencil* abstraction: a code-generating object, parameterized by named references to (bound) AST nodes. Given a match result, a stencil can be evaluated to a string of source code.
A stencil is similar in spirit to a format string: it is composed of a series of raw text strings, references to nodes (the parameters) and helper code-generation operations.
See thread on cfe-dev list with subject "[RFC] Easier source-to-source transformations with clang tooling" for background.
Reviewers: sbenza
Reviewed By: sbenza
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, mgorny, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59371
llvm-svn: 358691
Summary:
Currently clang-format uses ContinuationIndent to indent the contents of a raw
string literal that is the last parameter of the function call. This is to
achieve formatting similar to trailing:
```
f(1, 2, R"pb(
x: y)pb");
```
However this had the unfortunate consequence of producing format like this:
```
fffffff(1, 2,
R"pb(
a: b
)pb");
```
This patch makes clang-format consider indenting a trailing raw string param
after a newline based off the start of the format delimiter, producing:
```
fffffff(1, 2,
R"pb(
a: b
)pb");
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60558
llvm-svn: 358689
There are barely any lines I haven't changed in these files, so I think I could
might as well leave it in an LLVM coding style conforming state. I also renamed
2 functions and moved addDependency out of line to ease on followup patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59457
llvm-svn: 358676
Sort the elements of Sema::OpenCLTypeExtMap and Sema::OpenCLDeclExtMap
by TypeIDs and DeclIDs to guarantee a stable serialization order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60835
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Reviewers: Anastasia, lebedev.ri
llvm-svn: 358674
Summary:
Also add a test to verify clang-tidy only apply the first alternative
fix.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60857
llvm-svn: 358666
If accessing the MSVC installation root directly on a case sensitive
filesystem, these details matter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60627
llvm-svn: 358662
global module fragment.
We know that the declaration in question should have been introduced by
a '#include', so try to figure out which one and suggest it. Don't
suggest importing the global module fragment itself!
llvm-svn: 358631
retaining block and all of the enclosing blocks are non-escaping.
If the block implicitly retaining self doesn't escape, there is no risk
of creating retain cycles, so clang shouldn't diagnose it and force
users to add self-> to silence the diagnostic.
Also, fix a bug where clang was failing to diagnose an implicitly
retained self inside a c++ lambda nested inside a block.
rdar://problem/25059955
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60736
llvm-svn: 358624
For the following code snippet:
void builtin_function_call_crash_fixes(char *c) {
__builtin_strncpy(c, "", 6);
__builtin_memset(c, '\0', (0));
__builtin_memcpy(c, c, 0);
}
security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling caused a regression, as it
didn't recognize functions starting with __builtin_. Fixed exactly that.
I wanted to modify an existing test file, but the two I found didn't seem like
perfect candidates. While I was there, I prettified their RUN: lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59812
llvm-svn: 358609
All target-parallel-based constructs can be run in SPMD mode from now
on. Even if num_threads clauses or if clauses are used, such constructs
can be executed in SPMD mode.
llvm-svn: 358595
Summary:
Motivation/Context: in the code review system integrating with clang-tidy,
clang-tidy doesn't provide a human-readable description of the fix. Usually
developers have to preview a code diff (before vs after apply the fix) to
understand what the fix does before applying a fix.
This patch proposes that each clang-tidy check provides a short and
actional fix description that can be shown in the UI, so that users can know
what the fix does without previewing diff.
This patch extends clang-tidy framework to support fix descriptions (will add implementations for
existing checks in the future). Fix descriptions and fixes are emitted via diagnostic::Note (rather than
attaching the main warning diagnostic).
Before this patch:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning") << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...);
}
```
After:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning"); // Emit a check warning
diag(loc, "fix description", DiagnosticIDs::Note) << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...); // Emit a diagnostic note and a fix
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman, JonasToth, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59932
llvm-svn: 358576
Summary:
When -gsplit-dwarf is used together with other -g options, in most cases
the computed debug info level is decided by the last -g option, with one
special case (see below). This patch drops that special case and thus
makes it easy to reason about:
// If a lower debug level -g comes after -gsplit-dwarf, in some cases
// -gsplit-dwarf is cancelled.
-gsplit-dwarf -g0 => 0
-gsplit-dwarf -gline-directives-only => DebugDirectivesOnly
-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 1
-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 + split
// If -gsplit-dwarf comes after -g options, with this patch, the net
// effect is 2 + split for all combinations
-g0 -gsplit-dwarf => 2 + split
-gline-directives-only -gsplit-dwarf => 2 + split
-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 2 + split
-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 + split (before) 2 + split (after)
The last case has been changed. In general, if the user intends to lower
debug info level, place that -g option after -gsplit-dwarf.
Some context:
In gcc, the last of -gsplit-dwarf -g0 -g1 -g2 -g3 -ggdb[0-3] -gdwarf-*
... decides the debug info level (-gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-* have level 2).
It is a bit unfortunate that -gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-* ... participate in
the level computation but that is the status quo.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, probinson
Reviewed By: dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: probinson, aprantl, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59923
llvm-svn: 358544
Summary:
Previously, we would return true/false signifying if the cache/lookup
succeeded or failed. Instead, provide clients with the underlying error
that was thrown while attempting to look up in the cache.
Since clang::FileManager doesn't make use of this information, it discards the
error that's received and casts away to bool.
This change is NFC.
Reviewers: benlangmuir, arphaman
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60735
llvm-svn: 358509
The FIXME of this test case has been addressed in r335084/r338800. Its
execution still does not succeed because of multiple syntax errors.
First, the "clang" namespace is missing on each of the 4 pragmas.
Second, the pragma for defining the vector width is "vectorize_width(4)"
instead of "vectorize(4)". Third, the pragma for defining the interleave
factor is "interleave_count(8)" instead of "interleave(8)".
The file was already using the wrong syntax when added in
r210925 2014-06-13. The file ast-print-pragmas.cpp already checks for
the correct pragma order, making this test redundant even if fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60749
llvm-svn: 358507
Combined constructs with parallel and if clauses without modifiers may
be executed in SPMD mode since if the condition is true for the target
region, it is also true for parallel region and the threads must be run
in parallel.
llvm-svn: 358503
The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
LLDB can't currently handle Clang's default (limit/no-standalone) DWARF,
so platforms that default to LLDB (Darwin) or anyone else manually
requesting LLDB tuning, should also get standalone DWARF.
That doesn't mean a user can't explicitly enable (because they have
other reasons to prefer standalone DWARF (such as that they're only
building half their application with debug info enabled, and half
without - or because they're tuning for GDB, but want to be able to use
it under LLDB too (this is the default on FreeBSD))) or disable (testing
LLDB fixes/improvements that handle no-standalone mode, building C code,
perhaps, which wouldn't have the LLDB<>no-standalone conflict, etc) the
feature regardless of the tuning.
llvm-svn: 358464
Richard Smith