Instead of using CLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER for use of the
static analyzer in both clang and clang-tidy, add a second
toggle CLANG_TIDY_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER.
This allows enabling the static analyzer in clang-tidy while
disabling it in clang.
Differential Revison: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87118
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
D61187 didn't delete config.clangd_xpc_support from test/
CLANGD_BUILD_XPC is defined in clangd/CMakeLists.txt and not available in test/lit.site.cfg.py.in
llvm-svn: 359428
The CMake variable controlling if XPC code is built is called
CLANGD_BUILD_XPC but three places unintentionally checked the
non-existent variable CLANGD_BUILD_XPC_SUPPORT instead, which (due to
being nonexistent, and due to cmake) always silently evaluated to false.
Luckily the test still seems to pass, despite never running after being
added almost 3 months ago in r351280.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60120
llvm-svn: 357719
Nico Weber