both fallthrough and a conditional branch target the same successor.
Gracefully delete the conditional branch and introduce any unconditional
branch needed to reach the actual successor. This fixes memory
corruption in 2009-06-15-RegScavengerAssert.ll and possibly other tests.
Also, while I'm here fix a latent bug I spotted by inspection. I never
applied the same fundamental fix to this fallthrough successor finding
logic that I did to the logic used when there are no conditional
branches. As a consequence it would have selected landing pads had they
be aligned in just the right way here. I don't have a test case as
I spotted this by inspection, and the previous time I found this
required have of TableGen's source code to produce it. =/ I hate backend
bugs. ;]
Thanks to Jim Grosbach for helping me reason through this and reviewing
the fix.
llvm-svn: 154867
This is mostly to test the waters. I'd like to get results from FNT
build bots and other bots running on non-x86 platforms.
This feature has been pretty heavily tested over the last few months by
me, and it fixes several of the execution time regressions caused by the
inlining work by preventing inlining decisions from radically impacting
block layout.
I've seen very large improvements in yacr2 and ackermann benchmarks,
along with the expected noise across all of the benchmark suite whenever
code layout changes. I've analyzed all of the regressions and fixed
them, or found them to be impossible to fix. See my email to llvmdev for
more details.
I'd like for this to be in 3.1 as it complements the inliner changes,
but if any failures are showing up or anyone has concerns, it is just
a flag flip and so can be easily turned off.
I'm switching it on tonight to try and get at least one run through
various folks' performance suites in case SPEC or something else has
serious issues with it. I'll watch bots and revert if anything shows up.
llvm-svn: 154816
once we start changing the block layout, so just nuke it. If anyone has
ideas about how to craft a code layout agnostic form of the test please
let me know.
llvm-svn: 154815
rotation. When there is a loop backedge which is an unconditional
branch, we will end up with a branch somewhere no matter what. Try
placing this backedge in a fallthrough position above the loop header as
that will definitely remove at least one branch from the loop iteration,
where whole loop rotation may not.
I haven't seen any benchmarks where this is important but loop-blocks.ll
tests for it, and so this will be covered when I flip the default.
llvm-svn: 154812
laid out in a form with a fallthrough into the header and a fallthrough
out of the bottom. In that case, leave the loop alone because any
rotation will introduce unnecessary branches. If either side looks like
it will require an explicit branch, then the rotation won't add any, do
it to ensure the branch occurs outside of the loop (if possible) and
maximize the benefit of the fallthrough in the bottom.
llvm-svn: 154806
This is a complex change that resulted from a great deal of
experimentation with several different benchmarks. The one which proved
the most useful is included as a test case, but I don't know that it
captures all of the relevant changes, as I didn't have specific
regression tests for each, they were more the result of reasoning about
what the old algorithm would possibly do wrong. I'm also failing at the
moment to craft more targeted regression tests for these changes, if
anyone has ideas, it would be welcome.
The first big thing broken with the old algorithm is the idea that we
can take a basic block which has a loop-exiting successor and a looping
successor and use the looping successor as the layout top in order to
get that particular block to be the bottom of the loop after layout.
This happens to work in many cases, but not in all.
The second big thing broken was that we didn't try to select the exit
which fell into the nearest enclosing loop (to which we exit at all). As
a consequence, even if the rotation worked perfectly, it would result in
one of two bad layouts. Either the bottom of the loop would get
fallthrough, skipping across a nearer enclosing loop and thereby making
it discontiguous, or it would be forced to take an explicit jump over
the nearest enclosing loop to earch its successor. The point of the
rotation is to get fallthrough, so we need it to fallthrough to the
nearest loop it can.
The fix to the first issue is to actually layout the loop from the loop
header, and then rotate the loop such that the correct exiting edge can
be a fallthrough edge. This is actually much easier than I anticipated
because we can handle all the hard parts of finding a viable rotation
before we do the layout. We just store that, and then rotate after
layout is finished. No inner loops get split across the post-rotation
backedge because we check for them when selecting the rotation.
That fix exposed a latent problem with our exitting block selection --
we should allow the backedge to point into the middle of some inner-loop
chain as there is no real penalty to it, the whole point is that it
*won't* be a fallthrough edge. This may have blocked the rotation at all
in some cases, I have no idea and no test case as I've never seen it in
practice, it was just noticed by inspection.
Finally, all of these fixes, and studying the loops they produce,
highlighted another problem: in rotating loops like this, we sometimes
fail to align the destination of these backwards jumping edges. Fix this
by actually walking the backwards edges rather than relying on loopinfo.
This fixes regressions on heapsort if block placement is enabled as well
as lots of other cases where the previous logic would introduce an
abundance of unnecessary branches into the execution.
llvm-svn: 154783
There is an assert at line 558 in ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA).
This assert needs to addressed for post RA scheduler. Until that assert is addressed,
any passes that uses post ra scheduler will fail. So, I am temporarily disabling the
hexagon tests until that fix is in.
The assert is as follows:
assert(!MI->isTerminator() && !MI->isLabel() &&
"Cannot schedule terminators or labels!");
llvm-svn: 154617
- FCOPYSIGN nodes that have operands of different types were not handled.
- Different code was generated depending on the endianness of the target.
Additionally, code is added that emits INS and EXT instructions, if they are
supported by target (they are R2 instructions).
llvm-svn: 154540
Original message:
Modify the code that lowers shuffles to blends from using blendvXX to vblendXX.
blendV uses a register for the selection while Vblend uses an immediate.
On sandybridge they still have the same latency and execute on the same execution ports.
llvm-svn: 154483
blendv uses a register for the selection while vblend uses an immediate.
On sandybridge they still have the same latency and execute on the same execution ports.
llvm-svn: 154396
legalizer always use the DAG entry node. This is wrong when the libcall is
emitted as a tail call since it effectively folds the return node. If
the return node's input chain is not the entry (i.e. call, load, or store)
use that as the tail call input chain.
PR12419
rdar://9770785
rdar://11195178
llvm-svn: 154370
in-register, such that we can use a single vector store rather then a
series of scalar stores.
For func_4_8 the generated code
vldr d16, LCPI0_0
vmov d17, r0, r1
vadd.i16 d16, d17, d16
vmov.u16 r0, d16[3]
strb r0, [r2, #3]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[2]
strb r0, [r2, #2]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[1]
strb r0, [r2, #1]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[0]
strb r0, [r2]
bx lr
becomes
vldr d16, LCPI0_0
vmov d17, r0, r1
vadd.i16 d16, d17, d16
vuzp.8 d16, d17
vst1.32 {d16[0]}, [r2, :32]
bx lr
I'm not fond of how this combine pessimizes 2012-03-13-DAGCombineBug.ll,
but I couldn't think of a way to judiciously apply this combine.
This
ldrh r0, [r0, #4]
strh r0, [r1]
becomes
vldr d16, [r0]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[2]
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vuzp.16 d16, d17
vst1.32 {d16[0]}, [r1, :32]
PR11158
rdar://10703339
llvm-svn: 154340
x86 addressing modes. This allows PIE-based TLS offsets to fit directly
into an addressing mode immediate offset, which is the last remaining
code quality issue from PR12380. With this patch, that PR is completely
fixed.
To understand why this patch is correct to match these offsets into
addressing mode immediates, break it down by cases:
1) 32-bit is trivially correct, and unmodified here.
2) 64-bit non-small mode is unchanged and never matches.
3) 64-bit small PIC code which is RIP-relative is handled specially in
the match to try to fit RIP into the base register. If it fails, it
now early exits. This behavior is unchanged by the patch.
4) 64-bit small non-PIC code which is not RIP-relative continues to work
as it did before. The reason these immediates are safe is because the
ABI ensures they fit in small mode. This behavior is unchanged.
5) 64-bit small PIC code which is *not* using RIP-relative addressing.
This is the only case changed by the patch, and the primary place you
see it is in TLS, either the win64 section offset TLS or Linux
local-exec TLS model in a PIC compilation. Here the ABI again ensures
that the immediates fit because we are in small mode, and any other
operations required due to the PIC relocation model have been handled
externally to the Wrapper node (extra loads etc are made around the
wrapper node in ISelLowering).
I've tested this as much as I can comparing it with GCC's output, and
everything appears safe. I discussed this with Anton and it made sense
to him at least at face value. That said, if there are issues with PIC
code after this patch, yell and we can revert it.
llvm-svn: 154304
comprehensive testing of TLS codegen for x86. Convert all of the ones
that were still using grep to use FileCheck. Remove some redundancies
between them.
Perhaps most interestingly expand the test cases so that they actually
fully list the instruction snippet being tested. TLS operations are
*very* narrowly defined, and so these seem reasonably stable. More
importantly, the existing test cases already were crazy fine grained,
expecting specific registers to be allocated. This just clarifies that
no *other* instructions are expected, and fills in some crucial gaps
that weren't being tested at all.
This will make any subsequent changes to TLS much more clear during
review.
llvm-svn: 154303
when -ffast-math, i.e. don't just always do it if the reciprocal can
be formed exactly. There is already an IR level transform that does
that, and it does it more carefully.
llvm-svn: 154296
optimizations which are valid for position independent code being linked
into a single executable, but not for such code being linked into
a shared library.
I discussed the design of this with Eric Christopher, and the decision
was to support an optional bit rather than a completely separate
relocation model. Fundamentally, this is still PIC relocation, its just
that certain optimizations are only valid under a PIC relocation model
when the resulting code won't be in a shared library. The simplest path
to here is to expose a single bit option in the TargetOptions. If folks
have different/better designs, I'm all ears. =]
I've included the first optimization based upon this: changing TLS
models to the *Exec models when PIE is enabled. This is the LLVM
component of PR12380 and is all of the hard work.
llvm-svn: 154294
Previously we used three instructions to broadcast an immediate value into a
vector register.
On Sandybridge we continue to load the broadcasted value from the constant pool.
llvm-svn: 154284
shuffle node because it could introduce new shuffle nodes that were not
supported efficiently by the target.
2. Add a more restrictive shuffle-of-shuffle optimization for cases where the
second shuffle reverses the transformation of the first shuffle.
llvm-svn: 154266
reciprocal if converting to the reciprocal is exact. Do it even if inexact
if -ffast-math. This substantially speeds up ac.f90 from the polyhedron
benchmarks.
llvm-svn: 154265
by default.
This is a behaviour configurable in the MCAsmInfo. I've decided to turn
it on by default in (possibly optimistic) hopes that most assemblers are
reasonably sane. If this proves a problem, switching to default seems
reasonable.
I'm not sure if this is the opportune place to test, but it seemed good
to make sure it was tested somewhere.
llvm-svn: 154235
LSR always tries to make the ICmp in the loop latch use the incremented
induction variable. This allows the induction variable to be kept in a
single register.
When the induction variable limit is equal to the stride,
SimplifySetCC() would break LSR's hard work by transforming:
(icmp (add iv, stride), stride) --> (cmp iv, 0)
This forced us to use lea for the IC update, preventing the simpler
incl+cmp.
<rdar://problem/7643606>
<rdar://problem/11184260>
llvm-svn: 154119
LSR can fold three addressing modes into its ICmpZero node:
ICmpZero BaseReg + Offset => ICmp BaseReg, -Offset
ICmpZero -1*ScaleReg + Offset => ICmp ScaleReg, Offset
ICmpZero BaseReg + -1*ScaleReg => ICmp BaseReg, ScaleReg
The first two cases are only used if TLI->isLegalICmpImmediate() likes
the offset.
Make sure the right Offset sign is passed to this method in the second
case. The ARM version is not symmetric.
<rdar://problem/11184260>
llvm-svn: 154079
A MOVCCr instruction can be commuted by inverting the condition. This
can help reduce register pressure and remove unnecessary copies in some
cases.
<rdar://problem/11182914>
llvm-svn: 154033
Do not try to optimize swizzles of shuffles if the source shuffle has more than
a single user, except when the source shuffle is also a swizzle.
llvm-svn: 153864
This adds a full itinerary for IBM's PPC64 A2 embedded core. These
cores form the basis for the CPUs in the new IBM BG/Q supercomputer.
llvm-svn: 153842
This is the CodeGen equivalent of r153747. I tested that there is not noticeable
performance difference with any combination of -O0/-O2 /-g when compiling
gcc as a single compilation unit.
llvm-svn: 153817
This is a code change to add support for changing instruction sequences of the form:
load
inc/dec of 8/16/32/64 bits
store
into the appropriate X86 inc/dec through memory instruction:
inc[qlwb] / dec[qlwb]
The checks that were in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node)>>ISD::STORE have been extracted to isLoadIncOrDecStore and reworked to use the better
named wrappers for getOperand(unsigned) (e.g. getOffset()) and replaced Chain.getNode() with LoadNode. The comments have also been expanded.
llvm-svn: 153635
This is a code change to add support for changing instruction sequences of the form:
load
inc/dec of 8/16/32/64 bits
store
into the appropriate X86 inc/dec through memory instruction:
inc[qlwb] / dec[qlwb]
The checks that were in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node)>>ISD::STORE have been extracted to isLoadIncOrDecStore and reworked to use the better
named wrappers for getOperand(unsigned) (e.g. getOffset()) and replaced Chain.getNode() with LoadNode. The comments have also been expanded.
llvm-svn: 153617
When an strd instruction doesn't get the registers it wants, it can be
expanded into two str instructions. Make sure the first str doesn't kill
the base register in the case where the base and data registers are
identical:
t2STRi12 %R0<kill>, %R0, 4, pred:14, pred:%noreg
t2STRi12 %R2<kill>, %R0, 8, pred:14, pred:%noreg
<rdar://problem/11101911>
llvm-svn: 153611
The arm_neon intrinsics can create virtual registers from the DPair
register class which allows both even-odd and odd-even D-register pairs.
This fixes PR12389.
llvm-svn: 153603
produces a 32-bit immediate which is consumed by the use. It tries to
fold the immediate by breaking it into two parts and fold them into the
immmediate fields of two uses. e.g
movw r2, #40885
movt r3, #46540
add r0, r0, r3
=>
add.w r0, r0, #3019898880
add.w r0, r0, #30146560
;
However, this transformation is incorrect if the user produces a flag. e.g.
movw r2, #40885
movt r3, #46540
adds r0, r0, r3
=>
add.w r0, r0, #3019898880
adds.w r0, r0, #30146560
Note the adds.w may not set the carry flag even if the original sequence
would.
rdar://11116189
llvm-svn: 153484
* Removed test/lib/llvm.exp - it is no longer needed
* Deleted the dg.exp reading code from test/lit.cfg. There are no dg.exp files
left in the test suite so this code is no longer required. test/lit.cfg is
now much shorter and clearer
* Removed a lot of duplicate code in lit.local.cfg files that need access to
the root configuration, by adding a "root" attribute to the TestingConfig
object. This attribute is dynamically computed to provide the same
information as was previously provided by the custom getRoot functions.
* Documented the config.root attribute in docs/CommandGuide/lit.pod
llvm-svn: 153408
The PPC64 SVR4 ABI requires integer stack arguments, and thus the var. args., that
are smaller than 64 bits be zero extended to 64 bits.
llvm-svn: 153373
execution-time regression for nsieve-bits on the ARMv7 -O0 -g nightly tester.
This may also improve compile-time on architectures that would otherwise
generate a libcall for urem (e.g., ARM) or fall back to the DAG selector.
rdar://10810716
llvm-svn: 153230
This results in things such as
vmovups 16(%rdi), %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rdi), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://11076953
llvm-svn: 153092
i128). In that case, we may not be able to print out the MCExpr as an
expression. For instance, we could have an MCExpr like this:
0xBEEF0000BEEF0000 | (0xBEEF0000BEEF0000 << 64)
The MCExpr printer handles sizes up to 64-bits, but this expression would
require 128-bits. In this situation, try to evaluate the constant expression and
emit that as the value into 64-bit chunks.
<rdar://problem/11070338>
llvm-svn: 153081
X86InstrCompiler.td.
It also adds –mcpu-generic to the legalize-shift-64.ll test so the test
will pass if run on an Intel Atom CPU, which would otherwise
produce an instruction schedule which differs from that which the test expects.
llvm-svn: 153033
This results in things such as
vmovaps -96(%rbx), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, -96(%rbx), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://10643481
llvm-svn: 152762
(i16 load $addr+c*sizeof(i16)) and replace uses of (i32 vextract) with the
i16 load. It should issue an extload instead: (i32 extload $addr+c*sizeof(i16)).
rdar://11035895
llvm-svn: 152675
Original commit message from r147481:
DAGCombine for transforming 128->256 casts into a vmovaps, rather
then a vxorps + vinsertf128 pair if the original vector came from a load.
Fix:
Unaligned loads need to generate a vmovups.
rdar://10974078
llvm-svn: 152366
When an instruction only writes sub-registers, it is still necessary to
add an <imp-def> operand for the super-register. When reloading into a
virtual register, rewriting will add the operand, but when loading
directly into a virtual register, the <imp-def> operand is still
necessary.
llvm-svn: 152095
The fpscr register contains both flags (set by FP operations/comparisons) and
control bits. The control bits (FPSCR) should be reserved, since they're always
available and needn't be defined before use. The flag bits (FPSCR_NZCV) should
like to be unreserved so they can be hoisted by MachineCSE. This fixes PR12165.
llvm-svn: 152076
This was testing the handling of sub-register coalescing followed by
remat. The original problem was caused by the extra <imp-def> operands
added by sub-register coalescing. Those <imp-def> operands are not
added any longer, and the test case passes even when the original patch
is reverted.
llvm-svn: 152040
In this update:
- I assumed neon2 does not imply vfpv4, but neon and vfpv4 imply neon2.
- I kept setting .fpu=neon-vfpv4 code attribute because that is what the
assembler understands.
Patch by Ana Pazos <apazos@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 152036
MachineOperands that define part of a virtual register must have an
<undef> flag if they are not intended as read-modify-write operands.
The old trick of adding an <imp-def> operand doesn't work any longer.
Fixes PR12177.
llvm-svn: 152008
Some BBs can become dead after codegen preparation. If we delete them here, it
could help enable tail-call optimizations later on.
<rdar://problem/10256573>
llvm-svn: 152002
In this instance we are generating the tail-call during legalizeDAG. The 2nd
floor call can't be a tail call because it clobbers %xmm1, which is defined by
the first floor call. The first floor call can't be a tail-call because it's
not in the tail position. The only reasonable way I could think to fix this
in a target-independent manner was to check for glue logic on the copy reg.
rdar://10930395
llvm-svn: 151877
floating point equality comparisons into integer ones with -ffast-math. The
issue is the optimization causes +0.0 != -0.0.
Now the optimization is only done when one side is known to be 0.0. The other
side's sign bit is masked off for the comparison.
rdar://10964603
llvm-svn: 151861
and stores was added.
- SelectAddr should return false if Parent is an unaligned f32 load or store.
- Only aligned load and store nodes should be matched to select reg+imm
floating point instructions.
- MIPS does not have support for f64 unaligned load or store instructions.
llvm-svn: 151843
so that the test will not fail when run on an Intel Atom
processor, due to the Atom scheduler producing an instruction sequence that is
different from that which is normally expected.
llvm-svn: 151832
To avoid problems with zero shifts when getting the bits that move between words
we use a trick: first shift the by amount-1, then do another shift by one. When
amount is 0 (and size 32) we first shift by 31, then by one, instead of by 32.
Also fix a latent bug that emitted the low and high words in the wrong order
when shifting right.
Fixes PR12113.
llvm-svn: 151637
When the GEP index is a vector of pointers, the code that calculated the size
of the element started from the vector type, and not the contained pointer type.
As a result, instead of looking at the data element pointed by the vector, this
code used the size of the vector. This works for 32bit members (on 32bit
systems), but not for other types. Added code to peel the vector type and
added a test.
llvm-svn: 151626
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
When an outgoing call takes more than 2k of arguments on the stack, we
don't allocate that call frame in the prolog, but adjust the stack
pointer immediately before the call instead.
This causes problems with the emergency spill slot because PEI can't
track stack pointer adjustments on the second pass, and if the outgoing
arguments are too big, SP can't be used to reach the emergency spill
slot at all.
Work around these problems by ensuring there is a base or frame pointer
that can be used to access the emergency spill slot.
<rdar://problem/10917166>
llvm-svn: 151604
Reverting this because it breaks static linking on ppc64. Specifically, it may be linkonce_odr functions that are the problem.
With this patch, if you link statically, calls to some functions end up calling their descriptor addresses instead
of calling to their entry points. This causes the execution to fail with SIGILL (b/c the descriptor address just
has some pointers, not code).
llvm-svn: 151433
[Joe Groff] Hi everyone. My previous patch applied as r151382 had a few problems:
Clang raised a warning, and X86 LowerOperation would assert out for
fptoui f64 to i32 because it improperly lowered to an illegal
BUILD_PAIR. Here's a patch that addresses these issues. Let me know if
any other changes are necessary. Thanks.
llvm-svn: 151432
reserving a physical register ($gp or $28) for that purpose.
This will completely eliminate loads that restore the value of $gp after every
function call, if the register allocator assigns a callee-saved register, or
eliminate unnecessary loads if it assigns a temporary register.
example:
.cpload $25 // set $gp.
...
.cprestore 16 // store $gp to stack slot 16($sp).
...
jalr $25 // function call. clobbers $gp.
lw $gp, 16($sp) // not emitted if callee-saved reg is chosen.
...
lw $2, 4($gp)
...
jalr $25 // function call.
lw $gp, 16($sp) // not emitted if $gp is not live after this instruction.
...
llvm-svn: 151402
The tied source operand of tMUL is the second source operand, not the
first like every other two-address thumb instruction. Special case it
in the size reduction pass to make sure we create the tMUL instruction
properly.
llvm-svn: 151315
value is zero. Instead of a cmov + op, issue an conditional op instead. e.g.
cmp r9, r4
mov r4, #0
moveq r4, #1
orr lr, lr, r4
should be:
cmp r9, r4
orreq lr, lr, #1
That is, optimize (or x, (cmov 0, y, cond)) to (or.cond x, y). Similarly extend
this to xor as well as (and x, (cmov -1, y, cond)) => (and.cond x, y).
It's possible to extend this to ADD and SUB but I don't think they are common.
rdar://8659097
llvm-svn: 151224
The standard function epilog includes a .size directive, but ppc64 uses
an alternate local symbol to tag the actual start of each function.
Until recently, binutils accepted the .size directive as:
.size test1, .Ltmp0-test1
however, using this directive with recent binutils will result in the error:
.size expression for XXX does not evaluate to a constant
so we must use the label which actually tags the start of the function.
llvm-svn: 151200
This test case was way too strict, matching the entire assembly output.
Every non-trivial change to the ppc backend or -O0 pipeline required
the test to be updated.
It should be replaced with a test of the specific vaarg feature.
llvm-svn: 151105
ecx = mov eax
al = mov ch
The second copy is not a nop because the sub-indices of ecx,ch is not the
same of that of eax/al.
Re-enabled machine-cp.
PR11940
llvm-svn: 151002
processor, due to the Atom scheduler producing an instruction sequence that is
different from that which is expected.
Patch by Michael Spencer!
llvm-svn: 150736
that are greater than the vector element type. For example BUILD_VECTOR
of type <1 x i1> with a constant i8 operand.
This patch fixes the assertion.
llvm-svn: 150477
If the DEC node had more than one user, it was doing this lowering but
leaving the original DEC node around and so decrementing twice.
Fixes PR11964.
llvm-svn: 150356
v8i8 -> v8i32 on AVX machines. The codegen often scalarizes ANY_EXTEND nodes.
The DAGCombiner has two optimizations that can mitigate the problem. First,
if all of the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR node are extracted from an ZEXT/ANYEXT
nodes, then it is possible to create a new simplified BUILD_VECTOR which uses
UNDEFS/ZERO values to eliminate the scalar ZEXT/ANYEXT nodes.
Second, another dag combine optimization lowers BUILD_VECTOR into a shuffle
vector instruction.
In the case of zext v8i8->v8i32 on AVX, a value in an XMM register is to be
shuffled into a wide YMM register.
This patch modifes the second optimization and allows the creation of
shuffle vectors even when the newly generated vector and the original vector
from which we extract the values are of different types.
llvm-svn: 150340
Creates a configurable regalloc pipeline.
Ensure specific llc options do what they say and nothing more: -reglloc=... has no effect other than selecting the allocator pass itself. This patch introduces a new umbrella flag, "-optimize-regalloc", to enable/disable the optimizing regalloc "superpass". This allows for example testing coalscing and scheduling under -O0 or vice-versa.
When a CodeGen pass requires the MachineFunction to have a particular property, we need to explicitly define that property so it can be directly queried rather than naming a specific Pass. For example, to check for SSA, use MRI->isSSA, not addRequired<PHIElimination>.
CodeGen transformation passes are never "required" as an analysis
ProcessImplicitDefs does not require LiveVariables.
We have a plan to massively simplify some of the early passes within the regalloc superpass.
llvm-svn: 150226
Chandler Carruth