The invalid undef value already triggers a verifier failure, but
then the upwards scan from the cleanuppad ends up asserting. Make
sure this is handled gacefully instead.
In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather
than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing
so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match.
Reviewed By: void, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410
I've changed the definition of the experimental.vector.splice
instrinsic to reject indices that are known to be or possibly
out-of-bounds. In practice, this means changing the definition so that
the index is now only valid in the range [-VL, VL-1] where VL is the
known minimum vector length. We use the vscale_range attribute to
take the minimum vscale value into account so that we can permit
more indices when the attribute is present.
The splice intrinsic is currently only ever generated by the vectoriser,
which will never attempt to splice vectors with out-of-bounds values.
Changing the definition also makes things simpler for codegen since we
can always assume that the index is valid.
This patch was created in response to review comments on D115863
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115933
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
Indirect inline asm operands may require the materialization of a
memory access according to the pointer element type. As this will
no longer be available with opaque pointers, we require it to be
explicitly annotated using the elementtype attribute, for example:
define void @test(i32* %p, i32 %x) {
call void asm "addl $1, $0", "=*rm,r"(i32* elementtype(i32) %p, i32 %x)
ret void
}
This patch only includes the LangRef change and Verifier updates to
allow adding the elementtype attribute in this position. It does not
yet enforce this, as this will require changes on the clang side
(and test updates) first.
Something I'm a bit unsure about is whether we really need the
elementtype for all indirect constraints, rather than only indirect
register constraints. I think indirect memory constraints might not
strictly need it (though the backend code is written in a way that
does require it). I think it's okay to just make this a general
requirement though, as this means we don't need to carefully deal
with multiple or alternative constraints. In addition, I believe
that MemorySanitizer benefits from having the element type even in
cases where it may not be strictly necessary for normal lowering
(cd2b050fa4/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp (L4066)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116531
Rust allows enums to be scopes, as shown by the previous change. Sadly,
D111770 disallowed enums-as-scopes in the LLVM Verifier, which means
that LLVM HEAD stopped working for Rust compiles. As a result, we back
out the verifier part of D111770 with a modification to the testcase so
we don't break this in the future.
The testcase is now actual IR from rustc at commit 8f8092cc3, which is
the nightly as of 2021-09-28. I would expect rustc 1.57 to produce
similar or identical IR if someone wants to reproduce this IR in the
future with minimal changes. A recipe for reproducing the IR using rustc
is included in the test file.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115353
The default for min is changed to 1. The behaviour of -mvscale-{min,max}
in Clang is also changed such that 16 is the max vscale when targeting
SVE and no max is specified.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113294
Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes
to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad
DWARF.
- Add a Verifier check that when a 'scope:' operand is an ODR type that is not an enum.
- Makes ODRUniquing apply to only ODR types with the same tag so that the debuginfo/DWARF is well-formed.
Reviewed By: probinson, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111770
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
This patch introduces the vector-predicated version of the
experimental_vector_splice intrinsic [1] at the IR level. It considers
the active vector length for both vectors and and uses a vector mask to
disable certain lanes in the result.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
Change originally authored by Vineet Kumar <vineet.kumar@bsc.es>
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103898
Currently, opaque pointers are supported in two forms: The
-force-opaque-pointers mode, where all pointers are opaque and
typed pointers do not exist. And as a simple ptr type that can
coexist with typed pointers.
This patch removes support for the mixed mode. You either get
typed pointers, or you get opaque pointers, but not both. In the
(current) default mode, using ptr is forbidden. In -opaque-pointers
mode, all pointers are opaque.
The motivation here is that the mixed mode introduces additional
issues that don't exist in fully opaque mode. D105155 is an example
of a design problem. Looking at D109259, it would probably need
additional work to support mixed mode (e.g. to generate GEPs for
typed base but opaque result). Mixed mode will also end up
inserting many casts between i8* and ptr, which would require
significant additional work to consistently avoid.
I don't think the mixed mode is particularly valuable, as it
doesn't align with our end goal. The only thing I've found it to
be moderately useful for is adding some opaque pointer tests in
between typed pointer tests, but I think we can live without that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109290
integer 0/1 for the operand of bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall"
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102996 changes the operand of bundle
"clang.arc.attachedcall". This patch makes changes to llvm that are
needed to handle the new IR.
This should make it easier to understand what the IR is doing and also
simplify some of the passes as they no longer have to translate the
integer values to the runtime functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103000
In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide
But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`,
which is `30`, not `29`. And indeed, alignment of `1073741824`
roundtrips IR serialization-deserialization.
While this doesn't seem all that important, this doubles
the maximal supported alignment from 512MiB to 1GiB,
and there's actually one noticeable use-case for that;
On X86, the huge pages can have sizes of 2MiB and 1GiB (!).
So while this doesn't add support for truly huge alignments,
which i think we can easily-ish do if wanted, i think this adds
zero-cost support for a not-trivially-dismissable case.
I don't believe we need any upgrade infrastructure,
and since we don't explicitly record the IR version,
we don't need to bump one either.
As @craig.topper speculates in D108661#2963519,
this might be an artificial limit imposed by the original implementation
of the `getAlignment()` functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108661
This patch adds vector-predicated ("VP") reduction intrinsics corresponding to
each of the existing unpredicated `llvm.vector.reduce.*` versions. Unlike the
unpredicated reductions, all VP reductions have a start value. This start value
is returned when the no vector element is active.
Support for expansion on targets without native vector-predication support is
included.
This patch is based on the ["reduction
slice"](https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504#1732277) of the LLVM-VP reference patch
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504).
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104308
This reverts the revert 28c04794df.
The failing MLIR test that caused the revert should be fixed in this
version.
Also includes a PPC test fix previously in 1f87c7c478.
This patch adjusts the intrinsics definition of
llvm.matrix.column.major.load and llvm.matrix.column.major.store to
allow overloading the type of the stride. The bitwidth of the stride is
used to perform the offset computation.
This fixes a crash when using __builtin_matrix_column_major_load or
__builtin_matrix_column_major_store on 32 bit platforms. The stride argument
of the builtins are defined as `size_t`, which is 32 bits wide on 32 bit
platforms.
Note that we still perform offset computations with 64 bit width on 32
bit platforms for accesses that do not take a user-specified stride.
This can be fixed separately.
Fixes PR51304.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107349
For musttail calls, ABI attributes between the function and the
musttail call must match. The current check discards the type of
type attributes like byval, which means that it will consider
byval(i32) and byval(i64) (or similar) as compatible.
I assume this is a leftover from before these attributes had a
type argument. Ran into this while trying to tighten an assertion
in AttrBuilder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105841
Use the elementtype attribute introduced in D105407 for the
llvm.preserve.array/struct.index intrinsics. It carries the
element type of the GEP these intrinsics effectively encode.
This patch:
* Adds a verifier check that the attribute is required.
* Adds it in the IRBuilder methods for these intrinsics.
* Autoupgrades old bitcode without the attribute.
* Updates the lowering code to use the attribute rather than
the pointer element type.
* Updates lots of tests to specify the attribute.
* Adds -force-opaque-pointers to the intrinsic-array.ll test
to demonstrate they work now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106184
As suggested on D105733, this adds a verifier rule that calls to
intrinsics must match the signature of the intrinsic.
Without opaque pointers this is automatically enforced for all
calls, because the pointer types need to match. If the signatures
don't match, a pointer bitcast has to be inserted. For intrinsics
in particular, such bitcasts are not legal, because the address of
intrinsics cannot be taken.
With opaque pointers, there are no more pointer bitcasts, so it's
generally possible for the call and the callee signature to differ.
However, for intrinsics we still want to enforce that the signatures
must match, the same as was done before through the address taken
check.
We can't enforce this more generally for non-intrinsics, because
calls with mismatched signatures at the very least can legally
occur in unreachable code, and might also be valid in some other
cases, depending on how exactly the signatures differ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106013
Intrinsics can only be called directly, taking their address is not
legal. This is currently only enforced for intrinsics that have an
ID, rather than all intrinsics. Adjust the check to cover all
intrinsics.
This came up in D106013.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106095
This implements the elementtype attribute specified in D105407. It
just adds the attribute and the specified verifier rules, but
doesn't yet make use of it anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106008
Continuing on from D105780, this should be the last major bit of
attribute cleanup. Currently, LLParser implements attribute parsing
for functions, parameters and returns separately, enumerating all
supported (and unsupported) attributes each time. This patch
extracts the common parsing logic, and performs a check afterwards
whether the attribute is valid in the given position. Parameters
and returns are handled together, while function attributes need
slightly different logic to support attribute groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105938
A couple of attributes had explicit checks for incompatibility
with pointer types. However, this is already handled generically
by the typeIncompatible() check. We can drop these after adding
SwiftError to typeIncompatible().
However, the previous implementation of the check prints out all
attributes that are incompatible with a given type, even though
those attributes aren't actually used. This has the annoying
result that the error message changes every time a new attribute
is added to the list. Improve this by explicitly finding which
attribute isn't compatible and printing just that.
the call's return type is void
Instead of trying hard to prevent global optimization passes such as
deadargelim from changing the return type to void, just ignore the
bundle if the return type is void. clang currently emits calls to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the function call result,
immediately after the function call to prevent changes to the return
type, but optimization passes can delete the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use if the function call doesn't return, which
enables deadargelim to change the return type.
rdar://76671438
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103062
With regards to overrunning, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(``subvec``) - 1)
must be valid ``vec`` indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(result_type) - 1)
must be valid vector indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
For the non-mixed cases (e.g. inserting/extracting a scalable into/from
another scalable, or inserting/extracting a fixed into/from another
fixed), it is possible to statically check whether or not the above
conditions are met. This was previously missing from the verifier, and
if the conditions were found to be false, the result of the
insertion/extraction would be replaced with an undef.
With regards to invalid indices, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
``idx`` represents the starting element number at which ``subvec``
will be inserted. ``idx`` must be a constant multiple of
``subvec``'s known minimum vector length.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
The ``idx`` specifies the starting element number within ``vec``
from which a subvector is extracted. ``idx`` must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Similarly, these conditions were not previously enforced in the
verifier. In some circumstances, invalid indices were permitted
silently, and in other circumstances, an undef was spawned where a
verifier error would have been preferred.
This commit adds verifier checks to enforce the constraints above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104468
Verifying opaque pointer as function parameter when using with `byval`, `byref`,
`inalloca`, `preallocated`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104309
This patch implements vector-predicated intrinsics on IR level for fadd,
fsub, fmul, fdiv and frem. There operate in the default floating-point
environment. We will use constrained fp operand bundles for constrained
vector-predicated fp math (D93455).
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93470
I don't like landing this change, but it's an acknowledgement of a practical reality. Despite not having well specified semantics for inttoptr and ptrtoint involving non-integral pointer types, they are used in practice. Here's a quick summary of the current pragmatic reality:
* I happen to know that the main external user of non-integral pointers has effectively disabled the verifier rules.
* RS4GC (the lowering pass for abstract GC machine model which is the key motivation for non-integral pointers), even supports them. We just have all the tests using an integral pointer space to let the verifier run.
* Certain idioms (such as alignment checks for alignment N, where any relocation is guaranteed to be N byte aligned) are fine in practice.
* As implemented, inttoptr/ptrtoint are CSEd and are not control dependent. This means that any code which is intending to check a particular bit pattern at site of use must be wrapped in an intrinsic or external function call.
This change allows them in the Verifier, and updates the LangRef to specific them as implementation dependent. This allows us to acknowledge current reality while still leaving ourselves room to punt on figuring out "good" semantics until the future.
SwiftTailCC has a different set of requirements than the C calling convention
for a tail call. The exact argument sequence doesn't have to match, but fewer
ABI-affecting attributes are allowed.
Also make sure the musttail diagnostic triggers if a musttail call isn't
actually a tail call.
in stripDebugInfo(). This patch fixes an oversight in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96181 and also takes into account loop
metadata pointing to other MDNodes that point into the debug info.
rdar://78487175
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103220
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
Nikita Popov