Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
llvm-svn: 266460
This patch implements __unaligned as a type qualifier; before that, it was
modeled as an attribute. Proper mangling of __unaligned is implemented as well.
Some OpenCL code/tests are tangenially affected, as they relied on existing
number and sizes of type qualifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596
llvm-svn: 266415
Although all the registers are actually 32-bits, I think we have to assume the
high 32-bits could be RES0 (the ARM ARM is unclear). If so, reading as a 32-bit
register can require extra zero extension operations.
llvm-svn: 266212
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
llvm-svn: 266186
Add a triple to the run lines so that integers will the same sizes across runs.
Also add a compile time check to ensure the assumptions about sizes are met.
llvm-svn: 265991
This patch add support for GCC attribute((ifunc("resolver"))) for
targets that use ELF as object file format. In general ifunc is a
special kind of function alias with type @gnu_indirect_function. LLVM
patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D15525
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15524
llvm-svn: 265917
In some cases, when we encounter a direct function call with an
incorrect number of arguments, we'll emit a diagnostic, and pretend that
the call to the function was valid. For example, in C:
int foo();
int a = foo(1);
Prior to this patch, we'd get an ICE if foo had an enable_if attribute,
because CheckEnableIf assumes that the number of arguments it gets
passed is valid for the function it's passed. Now, we check that the
number of args looks valid prior to checking enable_if conditions.
This fix was not done inside of CheckEnableIf because the problem
presently can only occur in one caller of CheckEnableIf (ActOnCallExpr).
Additionally, checking inside of CheckEnableIf would make us emit
multiple diagnostics for the same error (one "enable_if failed", one
"you gave this function the wrong number of arguments"), which seems
worse than just complaining about the latter.
llvm-svn: 264975
Summary:
__atomic_load's allows it's first argument to be a pointer to a const type. However the second argument is an output parameter and must be a pointer to non-const.
This patch fixes the signature of __atomic_load generated by clang so that it respects the above requirements.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13420
llvm-svn: 264967
Also includes a minor ``enable_if`` docs update.
Currently, our address-of overload machinery will only allow implicit
conversions of overloaded functions to void* in C. For example:
```
void f(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
void f(double) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(0, "")));
void *fp = f; // OK. This is C and the target is void*.
void (*fp2)(void) = f; // Error. This is C, but the target isn't void*.
```
This patch makes the assignment of `fp2` select the `f(int)` overload,
rather than emitting an error (N.B. you'll still get a warning about the
`fp2` assignment if you use -Wincompatible-pointer-types).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13704
llvm-svn: 264132
clang -cc1 -ast-print put the struct
definition in the wrong place, like this:
struct {} typedef S;
The reason that this happens is that the printing code
first prints the struct definition, and then tells the next
declaration to leave out the type. This behavior
is correct for simple variable declarations, but fails for
typedefs (or extern, mutable, etc).
The patch address this problem by skipping the struct
declaration when we first see it, and then telling the first
subsequent declaration that it needs to print out the full
struct definition.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17285
llvm-svn: 263836
Till now, preserve_mostcc/preserve_allcc calling convention attributes were only
available at the LLVM IR level. This patch adds attributes for
preserve_mostcc/preserve_allcc calling conventions to the C/C++ front-end.
The code was mostly written by Juergen Ributzka.
I just added support for the AArch64 target and tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18025
llvm-svn: 263647
r263299 added a fixit for the -Wformat-security warning, but that runs
into complications with our guideline that error recovery should be done
as-if the fixit had been applied. Putting the fixit on a note avoids that.
llvm-svn: 263584
This is a follow-up to r261512, which made the 'strict' availability
attribute flag behave like 'unavailable'. However, that fix was
insufficient. The following case would (erroneously) error when the
deployment target was older than 10.9:
struct __attribute__((availability(macosx,strict,introduced=10.9))) A;
__attribute__((availability(macosx,strict,introduced=10.9))) void f(A*);
The use of A* in the argument list for f is valid here, since f and A
have the same availability.
The fix is to return AR_Unavailable from DeclBase::getAvailability
instead of AR_NotYetIntroduced. This also reverts the special handling
added in r261163, instead relying on the well-tested logic for
AR_Unavailable.
rdar://problem/23791325
llvm-svn: 262915
Sema allows max values up to 2**28, use unsigned instead of unsiged
short to hold values that large.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17248
Patch by Don Hinton!
llvm-svn: 262466
Summary:
The printf/scanf format checker is a little over-zealous in handling the conditional operator. This patch reduces work by not checking code-paths that are never used and reduces false positives regarding uncovered arguments, for example in the code fragment:
printf(minimal ? "%i\n" : "%i: %s\n", code, msg);
Reviewers: rtrieu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15636
llvm-svn: 262025
Use "strict" instead of "nopartial". Also make strictly not-introduced
share the same diagnostics as Obsolete and Unavailable.
rdar://23791325
llvm-svn: 261512
"aligned", by Vladimir Yakovlev
Fix clang/gcc incompatibility of bitfields layout in the presence of
pragma packed and attributes aligned and packed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17023
llvm-svn: 261321
Clang implements an enable_if attribute as an extension. Hook up `-Wpedantic`
to issue an extension usage warning when __enable_if__ is used.
llvm-svn: 261192
An optional nopartial can be placed after the platform name.
int bar() __attribute__((availability(macosx,nopartial,introduced=10.12))
When deploying back to a platform version prior to when the declaration was
introduced, with 'nopartial', Clang emits an error specifying that the function
is not introduced yet; without 'nopartial', the behavior stays the same: the
declaration is `weakly linked`.
A member is added to the end of AttributeList to save the location of the
'nopartial' keyword. A bool member is added to AvailabilityAttr.
The diagnostics for 'nopartial' not-yet-introduced is handled in the same way as
we handle unavailable cases.
Reviewed by Doug Gregor and Jordan Rose.
rdar://23791325
llvm-svn: 261163
In my previous commit (rL260881) I forget to svn add tests. This commit adds
them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16846
llvm-svn: 260882
This patch is to upgrade FunctionTypeUnwrapper for correct processing of
AttributedType. Fixes PR25786.
Patch by Alexander Makarov.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15373
llvm-svn: 260373
r257357 fixed clang to warn on integer overflow in struct initializers.
However, it didn't warn when a struct had a nested initializer. This
commit makes changes in Sema::CheckForIntOverflow to handle nested
initializers.
For example:
struct s {
struct t {
unsigned x;
} t;
} s = {
{
.x = 4 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024
}
};
rdar://problem/23526454
llvm-svn: 260360
Sometimes, char arrays are used as bit storage, with no difference made between
signed and unsigned char. Thus, it is reasonable to use 0 to 255 instead of
-128 to 127 and not trigger this warning.
llvm-svn: 259947
Defined the new AVX512 registers in clang inline asm.
Fixed a bug in the MC subtarget info creation during the parsing of MS asm statement - now it receives the actual CPU and target features information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16757
llvm-svn: 259639
The main purpose here is that vfma/vfms should be symmetric, and they are
supported on most v7 cores.
The new ArchGuard is suggested by ACLE but prophylactic for us. Almost all CPUs
with NEON *will* have vfma, and the few exceptions I know of (e.g. Cortex-A8)
are incorrectly modelled by Clang so can't trigger a test.
Fortunately, they're getting rarer. But if we ever do support them properly
arm_neon.h should now do the right thing.
llvm-svn: 259537
Allow "mode" attribute for enum types, except for vector modes, for compatibility with GCC.
Support "mode" attribute with dependent types.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16219
llvm-svn: 259497
Patch by H.J. Lu
```
typedef unsigned int gcc_word __attribute__((mode(word)));
```
and
```
typedef unsigned int gcc_unwind_word __attribute__((mode(unwind_word)));
```
define the largest unsigned integer types which can be stored in a
general purpose register, which may not be the pointer type. For x32,
they aren't pointer nor unsigned long. We should
1. Make getUnwindWordWidth and getRegisterWidth virtual,
2. Override them for x32, similar to hasInt128Type.
3. Use getRegisterWidth for __attribute__((mode(word)));
This fixes PR 24706.
Reviewers: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16779
llvm-svn: 259383
Switch the evaluation from isIntegerConstantExpr to EvaluateAsInt.
EvaluateAsInt will evaluate more types of expressions than
isIntegerConstantExpr.
Move one case from -Wsign-conversion to -Wconstant-conversion. The case is:
1) Source and target types are signed
2) Source type is wider than the target type
3) The source constant value is positive
4) The conversion will store the value as negative in the target.
llvm-svn: 259271
In OpenCL, `bool` vectors are a reserved type, and are therefore
illegal.
Outside of OpenCL, if we try to make an extended vector of N `bool`s,
Clang will lower it to an `[N x i1]`. LLVM has no ABI for bitvectors, so
lots of operations on such vectors are thoroughly broken. As a result,
this patch makes them illegal in everything else, as well. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15721
llvm-svn: 259011
Tag and specifier printing can be suppressed in Decl::printGroup, but these suppressions leak into the initializers. Thus
int *x = ((void *)0), *y = ((void *)0);
gets printed as
int *x = ((void *)0), *y = ((*)0);
And
struct { struct Z z; } z = {(struct Z){}};
gets printed as
struct { struct Z z; } z = {(){}};
The stops the suppressions from leaking into the initializers.
Patch by Nick Sumner!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16438
llvm-svn: 258679
Allow "mode" attribute to be applied to VarDecl, not ValueDecl (which includes FunctionDecl and EnumConstantDecl), emit an error if this attribute is used with function declarations and enum constants.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16112
llvm-svn: 257868
Aaron Ballman