render the function deleted instead of rendering the program ill-formed.
This change also adds an enabled-by-default warning for the case where
an explicitly-defaulted special member function of a non-template class
is implicitly deleted by the type checking rules. (This fires either due
to this language change or due to pre-C++20 reasons for the member being
implicitly deleted). I've tested this on a large codebase and found only
bugs (where the program means something that's clearly different from
what the programmer intended), so this is enabled by default, but we
should revisit this if there are problems with this being enabled by
default.
llvm-svn: 343285
a base class via a using-declaration. If a class has a using-declaration
declaring either a constructor or an assignment operator, eagerly declare its
special members in case they need to displace a shadow declaration from a
using-declaration.
llvm-svn: 269398
In SemaCUDA all implicit functions were considered host device, this led to
errors such as the following code snippet failing to compile:
struct Copyable {
const Copyable& operator=(const Copyable& x) { return *this; }
};
struct Simple {
Copyable b;
};
void foo() {
Simple a, b;
a = b;
}
Above the implicit copy assignment operator was inferred as host device but
there was only a host assignment copy defined which is an error in device
compilation mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6565
llvm-svn: 224358
As PR20495 demonstrates, Clang currenlty infers the CUDA target (host/device,
etc) for implicit members (constructors, etc.) incorrectly. This causes errors
and even assertions in Clang when compiling code (assertions in C++11 mode where
implicit move constructors are added into the mix).
Fix the problem by inferring the target from the methods the implicit member
should call (depending on its base classes and fields).
llvm-svn: 218624
Richard Smith