This new version is much more aggressive about doing "full" reduction in
cases where it reduces register pressure, and also more aggressive about
rewriting induction variables to count down (or up) to zero when doing so
reduces register pressure.
It currently uses fairly simplistic algorithms for finding reuse
opportunities, but it introduces a new framework allows it to combine
multiple strategies at once to form hybrid solutions, instead of doing
all full-reduction or all base+index.
llvm-svn: 94061
contains another loop, or an instruction. The loop form is
substantially more efficient on large loops than the typical
code it replaces.
llvm-svn: 91654
of 91296 that caused trouble -- the Processed list needs to be
preserved for the livetime of the pass, as AddUsersIfInteresting
is called from other passes.
llvm-svn: 91641
cannot be folded into target cmp instruction.
- Avoid a phase ordering issue where early cmp optimization would prevent the
later count-to-zero optimization.
- Add missing checks which could cause LSR to reuse stride that does not have
users.
- Fix a bug in count-to-zero optimization code which failed to find the pre-inc
iv's phi node.
- Remove, tighten, loosen some incorrect checks disable valid transformations.
- Quite a bit of code clean up.
llvm-svn: 86969
strides for now, because it doesn't handle them correctly. This fixes a
miscompile of SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray.
This problem was usually hidden because indvars transforms such induction
variables into negations of canonical induction variables.
llvm-svn: 85118
that get created during loop unswitching, and fix SplitBlockPredecessors'
LCSSA updating code to create new PHIs instead of trying to just move
existing ones.
Also, optimize Loop::verifyLoop, since it gets called a lot. Use
searches on a sorted list of blocks instead of calling the "contains"
function, as is done in other places in the Loop class, since "contains"
does a linear search. Also, don't call verifyLoop from LoopSimplify or
LCSSA, as the PassManager is already calling verifyLoop as part of
LoopInfo's verifyAnalysis.
llvm-svn: 81221
using the Curiously Recurring Template Pattern with LoopBase.
This will help further refactoring, and future functionality for
Loop. Also, Headers can now foward-declare Loop, instead of pulling
in LoopInfo.h or doing tricks.
llvm-svn: 75519
trip counts in more cases.
Generalize ScalarEvolution's isLoopGuardedByCond code to recognize
And and Or conditions, splitting the code out into an
isNecessaryCond helper function so that it can evaluate Ands and Ors
recursively, and make SCEVExpander be much more aggressive about
hoisting instructions out of loops.
test/CodeGen/X86/pr3495.ll has an additional instruction now, but
it appears to be due to an arbitrary register allocation difference.
llvm-svn: 74048
casted induction variables in cases where the cast
isn't foldable. It ended up being a pessimization in
many cases. This could be fixed, but it would require
a bunch of complicated code in IVUsers' clients. The
advantages of this approach aren't visible enough to
justify it at this time.
llvm-svn: 73706
failures.
To support this, add some utility functions to Type to help support
vector/scalar-independent code. Change ConstantInt::get and
ConstantFP::get to support vector types, and add an overload to
ConstantInt::get that uses a static IntegerType type, for
convenience.
Introduce a new getConstant method for ScalarEvolution, to simplify
common use cases.
llvm-svn: 73431
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.
For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.
This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt
llvm-svn: 72897
rewrite the comparison if there is any implicit extension or truncation
on the induction variable. I'm planning for IVUsers to eventually take
over some of the work of this code, and for it to be generalized.
llvm-svn: 72496
of the comparison is defined inside the loop. This fixes a
use-before-def problem, because the transformation puts a use
of the RHS outside the loop.
llvm-svn: 72149
instructions. It attempts to create high-level multi-operand GEPs,
though in cases where this isn't possible it falls back to casting
the pointer to i8* and emitting a GEP with that. Using GEP instructions
instead of ptrtoint+arithmetic+inttoptr helps pointer analyses that
don't use ScalarEvolution, such as BasicAliasAnalysis.
Also, make the AddrModeMatcher more aggressive in handling GEPs.
Previously it assumed that operand 0 of a GEP would require a register
in almost all cases. It now does extra checking and can do more
matching if operand 0 of the GEP is foldable. This fixes a problem
that was exposed by SCEVExpander using GEPs.
llvm-svn: 72093
without one. Use it where we were using abs on
int64_t objects.
(I strongly suspect the casts to unsigned in the
fragments in LoopStrengthReduce are not doing whatever
the original intent was, but the obvious change to
uint64_t doesn't work. Maybe later.)
llvm-svn: 71612
and generalize it so that it can be used by IndVarSimplify. Implement the
base IndVarSimplify transformation code using IVUsers. This removes
TestOrigIVForWrap and associated code, as ScalarEvolution now has enough
builtin overflow detection and folding logic to handle all the same cases,
and more. Run "opt -iv-users -analyze -disable-output" on your favorite
loop for an example of what IVUsers does.
This lets IndVarSimplify eliminate IV casts and compute trip counts in
more cases. Also, this happens to finally fix the remaining testcases
in PR1301.
Now that IndVarSimplify is being more aggressive, it occasionally runs
into the problem where ScalarEvolutionExpander's code for avoiding
duplicate expansions makes it difficult to ensure that all expanded
instructions dominate all the instructions that will use them. As a
temporary measure, IndVarSimplify now uses a FixUsesBeforeDefs function
to fix up instructions inserted by SCEVExpander. Fortunately, this code
is contained, and can be easily removed once a more comprehensive
solution is available.
llvm-svn: 71535
Running /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm.src/test/
CodeGen/X86/dg.exp ...
FAIL: /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm.src/test/
CodeGen/X86/change-compare-stride-1.ll
Failed with exit(1) at line 2
while running: grep {cmpq $-478,} change-compare-stride-1.ll.tmp
child process exited abnormally
llvm-svn: 71013
CallbackVH, with fixes. allUsesReplacedWith need to
walk the def-use chains and invalidate all users of a
value that is replaced. SCEVs of users need to be
recalcualted even if the new value is equivalent. Also,
make forgetLoopPHIs walk def-use chains, since any
SCEV that depends on a PHI should be recalculated when
more information about that PHI becomes available.
llvm-svn: 70927
makes ScalarEvolution::deleteValueFromRecords, and it's code that
subtly needed to be called before ReplaceAllUsesWith, unnecessary.
It also makes ValueDeletionListener unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 70645
of returning a list of pointers to Values that are deleted. This was
unsafe, because the pointers in the list are, by nature of what
RecursivelyDeleteDeadInstructions does, always dangling. Replace this
with a simple callback mechanism. This may eventually be removed if
all clients can reasonably be expected to use CallbackVH.
Use this to factor out the dead-phi-cycle-elimination code from LSR
utility function, and generalize it to use the
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions utility function.
This makes LSR more aggressive about eliminating dead PHI cycles;
adjust tests to either be less trivial or to simply expect fewer
instructions.
llvm-svn: 70636
of LSR. This makes the AddUsersIfInteresting phase of LSR a pure
analysis instead of a phase that potentially does CFG modifications.
The conditions where this code would actually perform a split are
rare, and in the cases where it actually would do a split the split
is usually undone by CodeGenPrepare, and in cases where splits
actually survive into codegen, they appear to hurt more often than
they help.
llvm-svn: 70625
target hooks canLosslesslyBitCastTo and isTruncateFree. This allows
targets to avoid worrying about handling all combinations of integer
and pointer types.
llvm-svn: 70555
have pointer types, though in contrast to C pointer types, SCEV
addition is never implicitly scaled. This not only eliminates the
need for special code like IndVars' EliminatePointerRecurrence
and LSR's own GEP expansion code, it also does a better job because
it lets the normal optimizations handle pointer expressions just
like integer expressions.
Also, since LLVM IR GEPs can't directly index into multi-dimensional
VLAs, moving the GEP analysis out of client code and into the SCEV
framework makes it easier for clients to handle multi-dimensional
VLAs the same way as other arrays.
Some existing regression tests show improved optimization.
test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-03-13-InstrSched.ll in particular improved to
the point where if-conversion started kicking in; I turned it off
for this test to preserve the intent of the test.
llvm-svn: 69258
it is not APInt clean, but even when it is it needs to be evaluated carefully
to determine whether it is actually profitable.
This fixes a crash on PR3806
llvm-svn: 67134
to more accurately describe what it does. Expand its doxygen comment
to describe what the backedge-taken count is and how it differs
from the actual iteration count of the loop. Adjust names and
comments in associated code accordingly.
llvm-svn: 65382
addresses, part 1. This fixes an obvious logic bug. Previously if the only
in-loop use is a PHI, it would return AllUsesAreAddresses as true.
llvm-svn: 65178
reduction of address calculations down to basic pointer arithmetic.
This is currently off by default, as it needs a few other features
before it becomes generally useful. And even when enabled, full
strength reduction is only performed when it doesn't increase
register pressure, and when several other conditions are true.
This also factors out a bunch of exisiting LSR code out of
StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers into separate functions, and tidies
up IV insertion. This actually decreases register pressure even
in non-superhero mode. The change in iv-users-in-other-loops.ll
is an example of this; there are two more adds because there are
two fewer leas, and there is less spilling.
llvm-svn: 65108
addrec in a different loop to check the value being added to
the accumulated Start value, not the Start value before it has
the new value added to it. This prevents LSR from going crazy
on the included testcase. Dale, please review.
llvm-svn: 64440
my earlier patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
Also, when we build an expression that involves a (possibly
non-affine) IV from a different loop as well as an IV from
the one we're interested in (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop),
don't recurse into that. We can't do much with it and will
get in trouble if we try to create new non-affine IVs or something.
More testcases are coming.
llvm-svn: 62212
my last patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
I owe some testcases for this, want to get it in for nightly runs.
llvm-svn: 61362
my last patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. (This patch does not handle
all the cases where this can happen.) And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Everything above is exercised in
CodeGen/X86/lsr-negative-stride.ll (and ifcvt4 in ARM which is
the same IR).
llvm-svn: 61178
loops when they can be subsumed into addressing modes.
Change X86 addressing mode check to realize that
some PIC references need an extra register.
(I believe this is correct for Linux, if not, I'm sure
someone will tell me.)
llvm-svn: 60608
Dan Gohman