while we're completing in the middle of a function call), also produce
"ordinary" name results that show what can be typed at that point.
llvm-svn: 100558
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
the "typed" text, first, then take into account
nested-name-specifiers, name hiding, etc. This means that the
resulting sort is actually alphabetical :)
llvm-svn: 93370
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
definitions from a precompiled header. This ensures that
code-completion with macro names behaves the same with or without
precompiled headers.
llvm-svn: 92497
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
specializations and class template partial specializations (they're
never named directly). Also, member access expressions only refer to
value declarations (fields, functions, enumerators, etc.) and
Objective-C property declarations; filter out everything else.
llvm-svn: 91133
declaration by providing patterns for "getter = <method>" and "setter
= <method>". As part of this, invented a new "pattern" result kind
that is merely a semantic string. The "pattern" result kind should
help with other kinds of code templates.
llvm-svn: 89277
code to find and add Objective-C methods (starting at an
ObjCContainerDecl) into a single, static function. Also, make sure
that we search into the implementations of classes and categories to
find even more methods.
llvm-svn: 89163
- Introduce more code-completion string "chunk" kinds that describe
symbols, the actual text that the user is expected to type, etc.
- Make the generation of macro results optional, since it can be
slow
- Make code-completion accessible through the C API, marshalling the
code-completion results through a temporary file (ick) to maintain
process separation.
The last doesn't have tests yet.
llvm-svn: 86306
lookup in a member access expression always start a
nested-name-specifier. Additionally, rank names that start
nested-name-specifiers after other names.
llvm-svn: 82663
that there is one more argument (the one following the comma) and make
the candidate non-viable if the function cannot accept any argument in
that position.
llvm-svn: 82625
results for other, textual completion. For call completion, we now
produce enough information to show the function call argument that we
are currently on.
llvm-svn: 82592
members found in base classes have the same ranking as members found
in derived classes. However, we will introduce an informative note for
members found in base classes, showing (as a nested-name-specifier)
the qualification to name the base class, to make it clear which
members are from bases.
llvm-svn: 82586
-code-completion-at=filename:line:column
which performs code completion at the specified location by truncating
the file at that position and enabling code completion. This approach
makes it possible to run multiple tests from a single test file, and
gives a more natural command-line interface.
llvm-svn: 82571
opening parentheses and after each comma. We gather the set of visible
overloaded functions, perform "partial" overloading based on the set
of arguments that we have thus far, and return the still-viable
results sorted by the likelihood that they will be the best candidate.
Most of the changes in this patch are a refactoring of the overloading
routines for a function call, since we needed to separate out the
notion of building an overload set (common to code-completion and
normal semantic analysis) and then what to do with that overload
set. As part of this change, I've pushed explicit template arguments
into a few more subroutines.
There is still much more work to do in this area. Function templates
won't be handled well (unless we happen to deduce all of the template
arguments before we hit the completion point), nor will overloaded
function-call operators or calls to member functions.
llvm-svn: 82549
a nested-name-specifier that describes how to refer to that name. For
example, given:
struct Base { int member; };
struct Derived : Base { int member; };
the code-completion result for a member access into "Derived" will
provide both "member" to refer to Derived::member (no qualification needed) and
"Base::member" to refer to Base::member (qualification included).
llvm-svn: 82476
enumerators when either the user intentionally wrote a qualified name
(in which case we just use that nested-name-specifier to match
the user's code) or when this is the first "case" statement and we
need a qualified name to refer to an enumerator in a different scope.
llvm-svn: 82474
"->", or "::" if we will be looking into a dependent context. It's not
wrong to use the "template" keyword, but it's to needed, either.
llvm-svn: 82307
template smarter, by taking into account which function template
parameters are deducible from the call arguments. For example,
template<typename RandomAccessIterator>
void sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last);
will have a code-completion string like
sort({RandomAccessIterator first}, {RandomAccessIterator last})
since the template argument for its template parameter is
deducible. On the other hand,
template<class X, class Y>
X* dyn_cast(Y *Val);
will have a code-completion string like
dyn_cast<{class X}>({Y *Val})
since the template type parameter X is not deducible from the function
call.
llvm-svn: 82306
- after "using", show anything that can be a nested-name-specifier.
- after "using namespace", show any visible namespaces or namespace aliases
- after "namespace", show any namespace definitions in the current scope
- after "namespace identifier = ", show any visible namespaces or
namespace aliases
llvm-svn: 82251
look into the current scope for anything that could start a
nested-names-specifier. These results are ranked worse than any of the
results actually found in the lexical scope.
Perform a little more pruning of the result set, eliminating
constructors, __va_list_tag, and any duplication of declarations in
the result set. For the latter, implemented
NamespaceDecl::getCanonicalDecl.
llvm-svn: 82231
will provide the names of various enumerations currently
visible. Introduced filtering of code-completion results when we build
the result set, so that we can identify just the kinds of declarations
we want.
This implementation is incomplete for C++, since we don't consider
that the token after the tag keyword could start a
nested-name-specifier.
llvm-svn: 82222
essence, code completion is triggered by a magic "code completion"
token produced by the lexer [*], which the parser recognizes at
certain points in the grammar. The parser then calls into the Action
object with the appropriate CodeCompletionXXX action.
Sema implements the CodeCompletionXXX callbacks by performing minimal
translation, then forwarding them to a CodeCompletionConsumer
subclass, which uses the results of semantic analysis to provide
code-completion results. At present, only a single, "printing" code
completion consumer is available, for regression testing and
debugging. However, the design is meant to permit other
code-completion consumers.
This initial commit contains two code-completion actions: one for
member access, e.g., "x." or "p->", and one for
nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "std::". More code-completion actions
will follow, along with improved gathering of code-completion results
for the various contexts.
[*] In the current -code-completion-dump testing/debugging mode, the
file is truncated at the completion point and EOF is translated into
"code completion".
llvm-svn: 82166
Douglas Gregor