There are `constexpr` versions for the different `__invoke` functions, which seem to be identical other than begin `constexpr` since C++11 instead of being `constexpr` since C++20.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123003
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
In C++20 the type trait `type_identity` was introduced. For the same purpose there is `__identity` for pre-C++20 code. The name is confusing, because since C++20 there is also `identity`, which isn't a type trait.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122017
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
With this patch there should be no more namespaces without closing comment
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118668
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
All supported compilers provide support for inline variables in C++17 now.
Also, as a fly-by fix, replace some uses of _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR by just
constexpr.
The only exception in this patch is `std::ignore`, which is provided
prior to C++17. Since it is defined in an anonymous namespace, it always
has internal linkage anyway, so using an inline variable there doesn't
provide any benefit. Instead, `inline` was removed entirely on `std::ignore`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110243
There is a lot more we can do, in particular in <type_traits>, but this
removes some workarounds that were gated on checking a specific compiler
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108923
Clang used to support [[nodebug]] everywhere except on typedefs. Since
we don't support such old Clangs anymore, we can get rid of _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE
in favour of always using _LIBCPP_NODEBUG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108996
This will allow us to use variant in common_iterator. We do this by introducing a new `__light_array` type that variant uses instead of `std::array`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105597
The format library uses `std::monostate`, but not a `std::variant`.
Moving `std::monostate` to its own header allows the format library to
reduce the amount of included code.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105582
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
As mandated by the Standard's various synopses, e.g. [iterator.synopsis].
Searching the TeX source for '#include' is a good way to find all of these
mandates.
The new tests are all autogenerated by utils/generate_header_inclusion_tests.py.
I was SHOCKED by how many mandates there are, and how many of them
libc++ wasn't conforming with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99309
This patch changes the variant even in pre-C++2b.
It should not break anything, only allow use cases that didn't work previously.
Notes:
`__as_variant` is used in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt`, but I haven't used it in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt_at`.
That's because it is used only in `__visit_value_at`, which in turn is always used on variant specializations (that's in comparison operators).
* https://wg21.link/P2162
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97394
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
These changes cause substantial binary size increases for non-opt builds.
For example, the visit.pass.cpp test grows from 20k to 420k.
Further work will be done to re-land this patch without the size increases,
but that work is proving too tricky to fix forward.
This patch fully reverts:
* 35d2269111
And it partially reverts:
* bb43a0cd4a
The latter of which added XFAIL's to new variant tests
because the new implementation needlessly makes non-throwing code
paths in variant invoke throwing code.
This means the reverted change also breaks source backwards compat
with code compiled on OS X targeting older system dylibs. There is no
need for this to be the case. We should fix it before recommitting.
Reviewed as:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91662
The current way we test this is pretty cheap, i.e. we download previously
released macOS dylibs and run against that. Ideally, we would require a
full host running the appropriate version of macOS, and we'd execute the
tests using SSH on that host. But since we don't have such hosts available
easily for now, this is better than nothing.
At the same time, also fix some tests that were failing when back
deploying.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90869
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
Some system headers define __constructor and __destructor macros (for
Clang attributes constructor and destructor). While this is badly
behaved, it is easy for libc++ to work around this issue.
There are currently some failures caused by this change internally. I'm working
to debug them and hopefully these series of patches should be recommitted by
the end of the week.
Thank you to Micheal Park for the contributions, and for allowing the temporary
rollback.
The commits reverted by this change are:
7d15ece79ce0ec7a020602197f7e50a175a96517
A parameter pack is deemed to be uncaptured, which is bogus... but it seems to
be because it's within an expression that involves `decltype` of an uncaptured
pack or something: https://godbolt.org/z/b8z3sh
Drive-by fix for uglified name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86827
Thanks to @lewissbaker who pointed out the unnecessary condition in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D81954#inline-756872. Since this codepath does not
make use of `swap` anyway (that codepath is a different branch), we can safely
remove this condition and produce better codegen when all types are nothrow
movable but are potentially-throwing swappable.
See codegen in https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/uDFZjz
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83274
Summary:
In the case where `swap` is `noexcept`, we should avoid the extension to provide strong-exception guarantee.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46342
Reviewers: #libc, ldionne
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, mclow.lists, miscco, ldionne, zoecarver, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81954
In particular, improve the compile time of the overload set builder
that variant uses to determine which alternative to construct.
Instead of having the __overload type construct itself recursively,
this patch uses a flat construction for the overload set.
llvm-svn: 366033
The standard disallows narrowing conversions when constructing a variant.
This is checked by attempting to perform braced initialization of the
destination type from the argument type. However, braced initialization
can force the compiler (mostly clang) to eagerly instantiate the
constructors of the destintation type -- which can lead to errors in
a non-immediate context.
However, as variant is currently specified, the narrowing checks only
observably apply when the destination type is arithmetic. Meaning we can
skip the check for class types. Hense avoiding the hard errors.
In order to cause fewer build breakages, this patch avoids the narrowing
check except when the destination type is arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 366022
The paper P0608R3 - "A sane variant converting constructor" disallows
narrowing conversions in variant. It was meant to address this
surprising problem:
std::variant<std::string, bool> v = "abc";
assert(v.index() == 1); // constructs a bool.
However, it also disables every potentially narrowing conversion. For
example:
variant<unsigned> v = 0; // ill-formed
variant<string, double> v2 = 42; // ill-formed (int -> double narrows)
These latter changes break code. A lot of code. Within Google it broke
on the order of a hundred thousand target with thousands of root causes
responsible for the breakages.
Of the breakages related to the narrowing restrictions, none of them
exposed outstanding bugs. However, the breakages caused by boolean
conversions (~13 root causes), all but one of them were bugs.
For this reasons, I am adding a flag to disable the narrowing conversion
changes but not the boolean conversions one.
One purpose of this flag is to allow users to opt-out of breaking changes
in variant until the offending code can be cleaned up. For non-trivial
variant usages the amount of cleanup may be significant.
This flag is also required to support automated tooling, such as
clang-tidy, that can automatically fix code broken by this change.
In order for clang-tidy to know the correct alternative to construct,
it must know what alternative was being constructed previously, which
means running it over the old version of std::variant.
Because this change breaks so much code, I will be implementing the
aforementioned clang-tidy check in the very near future.
Additionally I'm plan present this new information to the committee so they can
re-consider if this is a breaking change we want to make.
I think libc++ should very seriously consider pulling this change
before the 9.0 release branch is cut. But that's a separate discussion
that I will start on the lists.
For now this is the minimal first step.
llvm-svn: 365960
Nikolas Klauser