In std::tuple, we should try to avoid calling std::is_copy_constructible
whenever we can to avoid surprising interactions with (I believe) compiler
builtins. This bug was reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523#2730953.
The issue was that when tuple<_Up...> was the same as tuple<_Tp...>, we
would short-circuit the _Or (because sizeof...(_Tp) != 1) and go evaluate
the following `is_constructible<_Tp, const _Up&>...`. That shouldn't
actually be a problem, but see the analysis in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770#2736470
for why it is with Clang and GCC.
Instead, after this patch, we check whether the constructed-from tuple
is the same as the current tuple regardless of the number of elements,
since we should always prefer the normal copy constructor in that case
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770
This fixes the issue by implementing _And using the short-circuiting
SFINAE trick that we previously used only in std::tuple. One thing we
could look into is use the naive recursive implementation for disjunctions
with a small number of arguments, and use that trick with larger numbers
of arguments. It might be the case that the constant overhead for setting
up the SFINAE trick makes it only worth doing for larger packs, but that's
left for further work.
This problem was raised in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101661
This nasty patch rewrites the tuple constructors to match those defined
by the Standard. We were previously providing several extensions in those
constructors - those extensions are removed by this patch.
The issue with those extensions is that we've had numerous bugs filed
against us over the years for problems essentially caused by them. As a
result, people are unable to use tuple in ways that are blessed by the
Standard, all that for the perceived benefit of providing them extensions
that they never asked for.
Since this is an API break, I communicated it in the release notes.
I do not foresee major issues with this break because I don't think the
extensions are too widely relied upon, but we can ship it and see if we
get complaints before the next LLVM release - that will give us some
amount of information regarding how much use these extensions have.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523
Because the constexpr-time codepath triggers a Clang bug. It seems
that Clang compiles it okay in release mode, but when Clang itself
is compiled in debug mode (with assertions turned on), this input
triggers an assertion failure in Clang itself. See comments on D96385
and Clang bug report https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
This commit should get the debug-mode buildbots back to green.
The implementation of tuple's constructors and assignment operators
currently diverges from the way the Standard specifies them, which leads
to subtle cases where the behavior is not as specified. In particular, a
class derived from a tuple-like type (e.g. pair) can't be assigned to a
tuple with corresponding members, when it should. This commit re-implements
the assignment operators (BUT NOT THE CONSTRUCTORS) in a way much closer
to the specification to get rid of this bug. Most of the tests have been
stolen from Eric's patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606.
As a fly-by improvement, tests for noexcept correctness have been added
to all overloads of operator=. We should tackle the same issue for the
tuple constructors in a future patch - I'm just trying to make progress
on fixing this long-standing bug.
PR17550
rdar://15837420
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50106
This patch ensures that SFINAE is used to delete assignment operators in pair and tuple based on issue 2729.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62454
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
The tests had copy-paste errors which started showing when an
unused-variable warning started being emitted after we made
the MoveOnly type constexpr (in a4b8ee6422).
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
This was previously committed as r372778 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 373092
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
This was previously committed as r372777 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372983
We don't support GCC 4 and older according to the documentation, so
we should pretend it doesn't exist.
This is a re-application of r372787.
llvm-svn: 372916
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 372778
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372777
Like CTAD for std::unordered_set, AppleClang 9's support for CTAD is
insufficient. I suspect the corresponding LLVM Clang is broken too,
but we don't seem to have testers using that Clang.
llvm-svn: 368911
Summary:
We were using implicit deduction guides instead of explicit ones,
however the implicit ones don't do work anymore when changing the
constructors.
This commit adds the actual guides specified in the Standard to make
libc++ (1) closer to the Standard and (2) more resistent to changes
in std::tuple's constructors.
Reviewers: Quuxplusone
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65225
llvm-svn: 368599
Previously we implemented all one trillion tuple-like constructors using
a single generic overload. This worked fairly well, except that it
differed in behavior from the standard version because it didn't
consider both T&& and T const&. This was observable for certain
types.
This patch addresses that issue by splitting the generic constructor
in two. We now provide both T&& and T const& versions of the
tuple-like constructors (sort of).
llvm-svn: 365973
types.
It seems some people like to write types that can explicitly convert
to anything, but cannot be used to explicitly construct anything.
This patch makes tuple tolerate such types, as is required
by the standard.
llvm-svn: 365074
When the arguments to tuple cat were const, the const was incorrectly
propagated into the type of the resulting tuple. For example:
const std::tuple<int> t(42);
auto r = std::tuple_cat(t, t);
// Incorrect! should be std::tuple<int, int>.
static_assert(is_same_v<decltype(r), std::tuple<const int, const int>>);
llvm-svn: 359255
When the whole test only works starting at some version of the Standard,
use UNSUPPORTED lit markup instead of #ifdef TEST_STD_VER. This provides
more visibility into the test suite.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D57704.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 353206
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan_init_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op_init.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.exclusive.scan/transform_exclusive_scan_init_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop_init.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC x64 truncation warnings.
warning C4267: conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_append/push_back.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC uninitialized memory warning.
warning C6001: Using uninitialized memory 'vl'.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR20855_tuple_ref_binding_diagnostics.pass.cpp
Include <cassert> for the assert() macro.
Fixes D43273.
llvm-svn: 326120
Summary:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20855
Libc++ goes out of it's way to diagnose `std::tuple` constructions which are UB due to lifetime bugs caused by reference creation. For example:
```
// The 'const std::string&' is created *inside* the tuple constructor, and its lifetime is over before the end of the constructor call.
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(std::make_tuple(42, "abc"));
```
However, we are over-aggressive and we incorrectly diagnose cases such as:
```
void foo(std::tuple<int const&, int const&> const&);
foo(std::make_tuple(42, 42));
```
This patch fixes the incorrectly diagnosed cases, as well as converting the diagnostic to use the newly added Clang trait `__reference_binds_to_temporary`. The new trait allows us to diagnose cases we previously couldn't such as:
```
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(42, "abc");
```
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41977
llvm-svn: 323380
Arthur O'Dwyer