P1518 does the following in C++23 but we'll just do it in C++17 as well:
- Stop requiring `Alloc` to be an allocator on some container-adaptor deduction guides
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some sequence container constructors
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some other container constructors (libc++ already did this)
The affected constructors are the "allocator-extended" versions of
constructors where the non-allocator arguments are already sufficient
to deduce the allocator type. For example,
std::pmr::vector<int> v1;
std::vector v2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
std::stack s2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97742
* adds `sized_range` and conformance tests
* moves `disable_sized_range` into namespace `std::ranges`
* removes explicit type parameter
Implements part of P0896 'The One Ranges Proposal'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102434
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
* `std::ranges::range`
* `std::ranges::sentinel_t`
* `std::ranges::range_difference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_value_t`
* `std::ranges::range_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_rvalue_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::common_range`
`range_size_t` depends on `sized_range` and will be added alongside it.
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100255.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100269
In particular, `span<int>::iterator` may be a raw pointer type
and thus have no nested typedef `iterator::value_type`. However,
we already know that the value_type we expect for `span<int>` is just `int`.
Fix up all other iterator_concept_conformance tests in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101420
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
In addition to making the code a lot easier to grasp by localizing many
helper functions to the only file where they are actually needed, this
will allow creating helper functions that depend on allocator_traits
outside of <memory>.
This is done as part of implementing array support in allocate_shared,
which requires non-trivial array initialization algorithms that would be
better to keep out of <memory> for sanity. It's also a first step towards
splitting up our monolithic headers into finer grained ones, which will
make it easier to reuse functionality across the library. For example,
it's just weird that we had to define `addressof` inside <type_traits>
to avoid circular dependencies -- instead it's better to implement those
in true helper headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93074
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
After rebasing my trivially-relocatable branch, this behavior was broken...
but no libc++ unit test caught it! Add a regression test specifically for
erasing out of a vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88421
This commit adds std::construct_at, and marks various members of
std::allocator_traits and std::allocator as constexpr. It also adds
tests and turns the existing tests into hybrid constexpr/runtime tests.
Thanks to Richard Smith for initial work on this, and to Michael Park
for D69803, D69132 and D69134, which are superseded by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364
The test is failing on 32-bit targets in C++03 mode. Clang produces
the following warning: 'integer literal is too large to be represented
in type 'long' and is subject to undefined behavior under C++98,
interpreting as 'unsigned long'; this literal will have type 'long
long' in C++11 onwards [-Wc++11-compat]' which is promoted to an error
and causes the test to fail.
There have been no changes in the test itself since 2019, so it looks
like the diagnostic has been updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81559
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
This allows both the old and the new testing formats to handle these
tests with modules enabled.
We also include the modules flags in the %{flags} substitution, which
means that .sh.cpp tests in the old format and all tests in the new
format will use modules flags when enabled.
We had a workaround because GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions
that are dependent on template parameters. This commit removes the
workaround and marks the corresponding tests as unsupported with GCC 5.
This has the benefit of bringing the new and the old test formats closer
without having to carry a workaround for an old compiler in the new
test format.
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
[libcxx] [test] Calling min and max on an empty valarray is UB.
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/min.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/max.pass.cpp
The calls `v1.min();` and `v1.max();` were emitting nodiscard warnings
with MSVC's STL. Upon closer inspection, these calls were triggering
undefined behavior. N4842 [valarray.members] says:
"T min() const;
8 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true.
T max() const;
10 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true."
As these tests already provide coverage for non-empty valarrays
(immediately above), I've simply deleted the code for empty valarrays.
[libcxx] [test] Add macros to msvc_stdlib_force_include.h (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.h
These macros are being used by:
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
Defining them to nothing allows that test to pass.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C5063 for is_constant_evaluated (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.const.eval/is_constant_evaluated.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing code that MSVC intentionally warns
about, so the warning should be silenced.
Additionally, comment an endif for clarity.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C4127 (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/charconv_test_helpers.h
MSVC avoids emitting this warning when it sees a single constexpr value
being tested, but this condition is a mix of compile-time and run-time.
Using push-disable-pop is the least intrusive way to silence this.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC truncation warning (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/construct_iter_iter.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally truncating float to int, which MSVC
intentionally warns about, so push-disable-pop is necessary.
[libcxx] [test] Avoid truncation warnings in erase_if tests (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/map/map.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.map/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multimap/erase_if.pass.cpp
These tests use maps with `short` keys and values, emitting MSVC
truncation warnings from `int`. Adding `static_cast` to `key_type`
and `mapped_type` avoids these warnings.
As these tests require C++20 mode (or newer), for brevity I've changed
the multimap tests to use emplace to initialize the test data.
This has no effect on the erase_if testing.
exceptions are disabled.
The patch was reverted due to some confusion about non-movable types. ie
types
that explicitly delete their move constructors. However, such types do
not meet
the requirement for `MoveConstructible`, which is required by
`std::vector`:
Summary:
`std::vector<T>` is free choose between using copy or move operations
when it
needs to resize. The standard only candidates that the correct exception
safety
guarantees are provided. When exceptions are disabled these guarantees
are
trivially satisfied. Meaning vector is free to optimize it's
implementation by
moving instead of copying.
This patch makes `std::vector` unconditionally move elements when
exceptions are
disabled. This optimization is conforming according to the current
standard wording.
There are concerns that moving in `-fno-noexceptions`mode will be a
surprise to
users. For example, a user may be surprised to find their code is slower
with
exceptions enabled than it is disabled. I'm sympathetic to this
surprised, but
I don't think it should block this optimization.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, rsmith
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: zoecarver, christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62228
llvm-svn: 371867
Arthur O'Dwyer