Previously we were writing an empty globals stream. Windows
tools interpret this as "private symbols are not present in
this PDB", even when they are, so we need to fix this. Regardless,
without it we don't have information about global variables, so
we need to fix it anyway. This patch does that.
With this patch, the "lm" command in WinDbg correctly reports
that we have private symbols available, but the "dv" command
still refuses to display local variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36535
llvm-svn: 310743
Summary:
MSVC link.exe records all external symbol names in the publics stream.
It provides similar functionality to an ELF .symtab.
Reviewers: zturner, ruiu
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35871
llvm-svn: 309303
Type records have a unique type index, but symbol records do
not. Instead, symbol records refer to other symbol records
by referencing their offset in the symbol stream. In a sense
this is the analogue of the TypeIndex, but we are not printing
it in the dumper. Printing it not only gives us more useful
information when manually investigating the contents of a PDB,
but also allows us to write better tests by enabling us to
verify that fields that reference other symbol records do
so correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34906
llvm-svn: 306890
Summary:
In order to do this without switching on the symbol kind multiple times,
I created Defined::getChunkAndOffset and use that instead of
SymbolBody::getRVA in the inner relocation loop.
Now we get the symbol's chunk before switching over relocation types, so
we can test if it has been discarded outside the inner relocation type
switch. This also simplifies application of section relative
relocations. Previously we would switch on symbol kind to compute the
RVA, then the relocation type, and then the symbol kind again to get the
output section so we could subtract that from the symbol RVA. Now we
*always* have an OutputSection, so applying SECREL and SECTION
relocations isn't as much of a special case.
I'm still not quite happy with the cleanliness of this code. I'm not
sure what offsets and bases we should be using during the relocation
processing loop: VA, RVA, or OutputSectionOffset.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: majnemer, inglorion, llvm-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34650
llvm-svn: 306566
Zachary Turner