PTHREAD_STACK_MIN is not available on NetBSD as it's not
clear what the value shall be represented by this constant
on a multiplatform OS.
llvm-svn: 344034
Summary:
This moves checking logic into the accessors and makes the structure smaller.
It will also help when/if Operand are generated from the TD files.
Subscribers: tschuett, courbet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52982
llvm-svn: 344028
Summary:
This patch forces the alignment of the `data` field of `IntervalMap`.
It is because x86 MSVC doesn't apply automatically
(without `__declspec(align(...))`) alignments more than 4 bytes,
even if `alignof` has returned so. Consider the example:
https://godbolt.org/z/zIPa_G
Here `alignof` for both `S0` and `S1` returns `8`, but only `S1` is really
aligned on x86. The explanation of this behavior is here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/conflicts-with-the-x86-compiler
Reviewers: bkramer, stoklund, hans, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52613
llvm-svn: 344027
Summary: Also add a few new test cases and a special case into handling of empty fixit ranges that collides with location of a diag.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52889
llvm-svn: 344025
As discussed on D52964, this adds 256-bit *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG lowering support for AVX1 targets to help improve SimplifyDemandedBits handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52980
llvm-svn: 344019
Summary:
This patch forces the alignment of the `data` field of `IntervalMap`.
It is because x86 MSVC doesn't apply automatically
(without `__declspec(align(...))`) alignments more than 4 bytes,
even if `alignof` has returned so. Consider the example:
https://godbolt.org/z/zIPa_G
Here `alignof` for both `S0` and `S1` returns `8`, but only `S1` is really
aligned on x86. The explanation of this behavior is here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/conflicts-with-the-x86-compiler
Reviewers: bkramer, stoklund, hans, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52613
llvm-svn: 344018
prefix.
Use this to direct these files to a specific location in the test suite
so that we don't write files out to random directories (or fail if the
working directory isn't writable).
llvm-svn: 344014
This is the second in a series of changes intended to make
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44748 more easily reviewable. Please see that
patch for more context. The first change being r344012.
Since I was requested to do all of this with post-commit review, this is
about as small as I can make this patch.
This patch makes LocationSize into an actual type that wraps a uint64_t;
users are required to call getValue() in order to get the size now. If
the LocationSize has an Unknown size (e.g. if LocSize ==
MemoryLocation::UnknownSize), getValue() will assert.
This also adds DenseMap specializations for LocationInfo, which required
taking two more values from the set of values LocationInfo can
represent. Hence, heavy users of multi-exabyte arrays or structs may
observe slightly lower-quality code as a result of this change.
The intent is for getValue()s to be very close to a corresponding
hasValue() (which is often spelled `!= MemoryLocation::UnknownSize`).
Sadly, small diff context appears to crop that out sometimes, and the
last change in DSE does require a bit of nonlocal reasoning about
control-flow. :/
This also removes an assert, since it's now redundant with the assert in
getValue().
llvm-svn: 344013
This is one of a series of changes intended to make
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44748 more easily reviewable. Please see that
patch for more context.
Since I was requested to do all of this with post-commit review, this is
about as small as I can make it (beyond committing changes to these few
files separately, but they're incredibly similar in spirit, so...)
On its own, this change doesn't make a great deal of sense. I plan on
having a follow-up Real Soon Now(TM) to make the bits here make more
sense. :)
In particular, the next change in this series is meant to make
LocationSize an actual type, which you have to call .getValue() on in
order to get at the uint64_t inside. Hence, this change refactors code
so that:
- we only need to call the soon-to-come getValue() once in most cases,
and
- said call to getValue() happens very closely to a piece of code that
checks if the LocationSize has a value (e.g. if it's != UnknownSize).
llvm-svn: 344012
This might produce hard to read/illegible diagnostics for especially
weird/non-trivial module metadata but integers are about all we are
using these days, so seems more useful than not.
Patch based on work by Kristina Brooks - thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52952
llvm-svn: 344011
Summary:
This makes BindingDecl's of the same name have different USRs, so that references can be correctly attributed.
int a[1] = {};
{ auto [x] = a; x; }
{ auto [x] = a; x; }
Reviewers: akyrtzi, arphaman, rsmith, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52445
llvm-svn: 344010
One case left around nonsensical operands for the KILL instruction
which the machine verifier checks for nowadays. While this should not
hurt in release builds we should fix the machine verifier errors anyway.
llvm-svn: 344008
The comment was contradicting the code. Looking at history the feature
was implemented a day after the comment was written without dropping the
comment.
llvm-svn: 344005
Summary:
gcc defines macros such as __code_model_small_ based on the user passed command line flag -mcmodel. clang accepts a flag with the same name and similar effects, but does not generate any macro that the user can use. This cl narrows the gap between gcc and clang behaviour.
However, achieving full compatibility with gcc is not trivial: The set of valid values for mcmodel in gcc and clang are not equal. Also, gcc defines different macros for different architectures. In this cl, we only tackle an easy part of the problem and define the macro only for x64 architecture. When the user does not specify a mcmodel, the macro for small code model is produced, as is the case with gcc.
Reviewers: compnerd, MaskRay
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52920
llvm-svn: 344000
Remove the space in the asm check so that the expression is more general
and can also capture MIPS labels which can be surrounded by braces, e.g.:
.4byte ($tmp1) # DW_AT_low_pc
Also change optimization level to O0 because the DW_TAG_label does not
appear on MIPS when -O2 is used.
Patch by Milos Stojanovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52901
llvm-svn: 343999
Simple types are a superset of what all in tree targets in LLVM could possibly have a legal type. This means the behavior of using isSimple to check for a supported type for X86 could change over time. For example, this could would change if a v256i1 type was added to MVT in the future.
llvm-svn: 343995
More tests related to PR39195:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39195
If we limit the horizontal codegen, it may require different
constraints for FP and integer.
llvm-svn: 343994
This patch implements a pass that optimizes condition branches on x86 by
taking advantage of the three-way conditional code generated by compare
instructions.
Currently, it tries to hoisting EQ and NE conditional branch to a dominant
conditional branch condition where the same EQ/NE conditional code is
computed. An example:
bb_0:
cmp %0, 19
jg bb_1
jmp bb_2
bb_1:
cmp %0, 40
jg bb_3
jmp bb_4
bb_4:
cmp %0, 20
je bb_5
jmp bb_6
Here we could combine the two compares in bb_0 and bb_4 and have the
following code:
bb_0:
cmp %0, 20
jg bb_1
jl bb_2
jmp bb_5
bb_1:
cmp %0, 40
jg bb_3
jmp bb_6
For the case of %0 == 20 (bb_5), we eliminate two jumps, and the control height
for bb_6 is also reduced. bb_4 is gone after the optimization.
This optimization is motivated by the branch pattern generated by the switch
lowering: we always have pivot-1 compare for the inner nodes and we do a pivot
compare again the leaf (like above pattern).
This pass currently is enabled on Intel's Sandybridge and later arches. Some
reviewers pointed out that on some arches (like AMD Jaguar), this pass may
increase branch density to the point where it hurts the performance of the
branch predictor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46662
llvm-svn: 343993
Emit a waterfall loop in the general case for a potentially-divergent Rsrc
operand. When practical, avoid this by using Addr64 instructions.
Recommits r341413 with changes to update the MachineDominatorTree when present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51742
llvm-svn: 343992
Some necessary yak shaving before lowering *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG 256-bit vectors on AVX1 targets as suggested by D52964.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52970
llvm-svn: 343991
Summary:
If `-nodefaultlibs` is given, we weren't actually linking to it. This
was true irrespective of passing `-rtlib=compiler-rt` (see previous
patch). Now we explicitly link it to handle that case.
I wonder if we should be linking these libraries only if we're using
`-nodefaultlibs`...
Reviewers: beanz
Subscribers: dberris, mgorny, christof, chrib, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51657
llvm-svn: 343990
The instructions are complicated, so this code will
probably never be very obvious, but hopefully this
makes it better.
As shown in PR39195:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39195
...we need to improve the matching to not miss cases
where we're h-opping on 1 source vector, and that
should be a small patch after this rearranging.
llvm-svn: 343989
Summary:
The NetBSD version of internal routines no longer call
the indirect syscall interfaces, as these functions were
switched to lib calls.
Remove the remnant code complication that is no
longer needed after this change. Remove the variations
of internal_syscall, as they were NetBSD specific.
No functional change intended.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, joerg, javed.absar
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52955
llvm-svn: 343988
Summary:
The dl library does not exist on all system and in particular
this breaks build on NetBSD. Make it conditional and
enable only for Linux, following the approach from other
test suites in the same repository.
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52994
llvm-svn: 343987
In r339636 the alias analysis rules were changed with regards to tail calls
and byval arguments. Previously, tail calls were assumed not to alias
allocas from the current frame. This has been updated, to not assume this
for arguments with the byval attribute.
This patch aligns TailCallElim with the new rule. Tail marking can now be
more aggressive and mark more calls as tails, e.g.:
define void @test() {
%f = alloca %struct.foo
call void @bar(%struct.foo* byval %f)
ret void
}
define void @test2(%struct.foo* byval %f) {
call void @bar(%struct.foo* byval %f)
ret void
}
define void @test3(%struct.foo* byval %f) {
%agg.tmp = alloca %struct.foo
%0 = bitcast %struct.foo* %agg.tmp to i8*
%1 = bitcast %struct.foo* %f to i8*
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %0, i8* %1, i64 40, i1 false)
call void @bar(%struct.foo* byval %agg.tmp)
ret void
}
The problematic case where a byval parameter is captured by a call is still
handled correctly, and will not be marked as a tail (see PR7272).
llvm-svn: 343986
Kamil Rytarowski