When we're using clang-cl and Microsoft's runtime implementation,
we don't provide align_val_t or aligned new/delete ourselves.
This patch updates the _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION macro
to reflect this.
llvm-svn: 343441
Summary:
The current code enables aligned allocation functions when compiling in C++17
and later. This is a problem because aligned allocation functions might not
be supported on the target platform, which leads to an error at link time.
Since r338934, Clang knows not to define __cpp_aligned_new when it's not
available on the target platform -- this commit takes advantage of that to
only use aligned allocation functions when they are available.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50344
llvm-svn: 339431
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
This patch fixes std::allocator, and more specifically, all users
of __libcpp_allocate and __libcpp_deallocate, to support over-aligned
types.
__libcpp_allocate/deallocate now take an alignment parameter, and when
the specified alignment is greater than that supported by malloc/new,
the aligned version of operator new is called (assuming it's available).
When aligned new isn't available, the old behavior has been kept, and the
alignment parameter is ignored.
This patch depends on recent changes to __builtin_operator_new/delete which
allow them to be used to call any regular new/delete operator. By using
__builtin_operator_new/delete when possible, the new/delete erasure optimization
is maintained.
llvm-svn: 328180
Patch from charlieio@outlook.com
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D42354
When the following command is used:
> clang-cl -std:c++17 -Iinclude\c++\v1 hello.cc c++.lib
An error occurred:
In file included from hello.cc:1:
In file included from include\c++\v1\iostream:38:
In file included from include\c++\v1\ios:216:
In file included from include\c++\v1\__locale:15:
In file included from include\c++\v1\string:477:
In file included from include\c++\v1\string_view:176:
In file included from include\c++\v1\__string:56:
In file included from include\c++\v1\algorithm:643:
In file included from include\c++\v1\memory:656:
include\c++\v1\new(165,29): error: redefinition of 'align_val_t'
enum class _LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS align_val_t : size_t { };
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.12.25827\include\vcruntime_new.h(43,16): note:
previous definition is here
enum class align_val_t : size_t {};
^
1 error generated.
vcruntime_new.h has defined align_val_t, libcxx need hide align_val_t.
This patch fixes that error.
llvm-svn: 324853
The vcruntime headers are hairy and clash with both libc++ headers
themselves and other libraries. libc++ normally deals with the clashes
by deferring to the vcruntime headers and silencing its own definitions,
but for clients which don't want to depend on vcruntime headers, it's
desirable to support the opposite, i.e. have libc++ provide its own
definitions.
Certain operator new/delete replacement scenarios are not currently
supported in this mode, which requires some tests to be marked XFAIL.
The added documentation has more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38522
llvm-svn: 315234
This reverts commit r306310.
r306310 causes clang to reject a call to an aligned allocation or
deallocation function if it is not implemented in the standard library
of the deployment target. This is not the desired behavior when users
have defined their own aligned functions.
rdar://problem/32664169
llvm-svn: 306859
attribute.
This is needed because older versions of libc++ do not have these
operators. If users target an older deployment target and try to compile
programs in which these operators are explicitly called, the compiler
will complain.
The following is the list of minimum deployment targets for the four
OSes:
macosx: 10.13
ios: 11.0
tvos: 11.0
watchos: 4.0
rdar://problem/32664169
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34556
llvm-svn: 306310
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
This recommits r294707 with additional fixes. The main difference is
libc++ now correctly builds without any ABI library.
exception.cpp is a bloody mess. It's full of confusing #ifdef branches for
each different ABI library we support, and it's getting unmaintainable.
This patch breaks down exception.cpp into multiple different header files,
roughly one per implementation. Additionally it moves the definitions of
exceptions in new.cpp into the correct implementation header.
This patch also removes an unmaintained libc++abi configuration.
This configuration may still be used by Apple internally but there
are no other possible users. If it turns out that Apple still uses
this configuration internally I will re-add it in a later commit.
See http://llvm.org/PR31904.
llvm-svn: 294730
exception.cpp is a bloody mess. It's full of confusing #ifdef branches for
each different ABI library we support, and it's getting unmaintainable.
This patch breaks down exception.cpp into multiple different header files,
roughly one per implementation. Additionally it moves the definitions of
exceptions in new.cpp into the correct implementation header.
This patch also removes an unmaintained libc++abi configuration.
This configuration may still be used by Apple internally but there
are no other possible users. If it turns out that Apple still uses
this configuration internally I will re-add it in a later commit.
See http://llvm.org/PR31904.
llvm-svn: 294707
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
r292564 disabled the aligned new/delete overloads on platforms without
posix_memalign. Unfortunately that patch also disabled the align_val_t
definition in C++17 as well.
This patch causes align_val_t to be exposed in C++17 regardless
of if we have the new/delete overloads.
llvm-svn: 292582
Summary:
This patch disables the aligned new/delet overloads on Apple platforms without `posix_memalign`. This fixes libc++.dylib build regressions on such platforms.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31448.
This patch should also be merged into the 4.0 release branch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, dexonsmith, jeremyhu
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28931
llvm-svn: 292564
Summary:
On Windows the identifier `__deallocate` is defined as a macro by one of the Windows system headers. Previously libc++ worked around this by `#undef __deallocate` and generating a warning. However this causes the WIN32 version of `__threading_support` to always generate a warning on Windows. This is not OK.
This patch renames all usages of `__deallocate` internally as to not conflict with the macro.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, majnemer, rnk, rsmith, smeenai, compnerd
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28426
llvm-svn: 291332
Fix a typo in the conditional. Caught by going through list of removed
symbols when building with hidden visibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26825
llvm-svn: 287309
This is a generalization of `_LIBCPP_NEW_DELETE_VIS`; the new macro name
captures the semantics better, and also allows us to get rid of the
`_WIN32` check in `include/new`. No functional change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26702
llvm-svn: 287164
Summary:
This patch implements the library side of P0035R4. The implementation is thanks to @rsmith.
In addition to the C++17 implementation, the library implementation can be explicitly turned on using `-faligned-allocation` in all dialects.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25591
llvm-svn: 284206
The behavior of this macro actually needs to apply universally on
Windows and not just when using the Microsoft CRT. Update the macro
definition and documentation accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25145
llvm-svn: 284016
Replace a stale reference to cxx_EXPORTS with _LIBCPP_BUILDING_LIBRARY,
and clarify why the operator new and delete family of functions are
marked dllexport when building but *not* dllimport when including the
header externally.
The new code is identical to the intent of the old code (and would be
functionally equivalent were cxx_EXPORTS still defined when building
libc++). The overall behavior is not ideal, since Microsoft's operator
new and delete functions will get called instead of libc++'s, but I
think consistently calling msvcrt's functions is better than either
calling msvcrt's or libc++'s functions depending on header inclusion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25042
llvm-svn: 282644
This patch removes the `<cstdlib>` include from exception where it is no longer
needed. Unlike my previous attempt this patch also adds <cstdlib> where needed
in other headers like <new> and <typeinfo>.
This won't fix the Firefox build issues discussed on IRC but it is more correct
for libc++.
llvm-svn: 280754
Summary:
This patch does 2 main things:
1. Enable sized delete if the feature test macro `__cpp_sized_deallocation` is enabled.
2. Rework and cleanup all of the sized delete tests.
Test Plan:
The sized delete replacement tests are now split into 4 files:
1. sized_delete11.pass.cpp: Ensure overriding sized delete in C++11 has no effect.
2. sized_delete14.pass.cpp: Test overriding sized delete in C++14 and ensure it is called. This test fails on clang and GCC < 5.1.
3. size_delete_calls_unsized_delete_.pass.cpp: Test that the default sized delete calls unsized delete.
4. sized_delete_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp: Test overriding sized delete when -fsized-deallocation is passed. This test should pass on clang and GCC >= 5.1
I have also removed a lot of cruft from the old tests. They no longer replace the new handler and tests that it is called for bad allocations.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9831
llvm-svn: 237662
Visual Studio's SAL extension uses a macro named __deallocate. This macro is
used pervasively, and gets included through various different ways. This
conflicts with the similarly named interfaces in libc++. Introduce a undef
header similar to __undef_min_max to handle this. This fixes a number of errors
due to the macro replacing the function name.
llvm-svn: 229162
The patch touches these files:
locale
array
deque
new
string
utility
vector
__bit_reference
__split_buffer
locale_win32.h
There is no intended functionality change and it is expected that reversing the position of the inline keyword with regard to the other keywords does not change the meaning of anything, least not for apple/Linux etc.
It is intended to make libcxx more consistent with itself and to prevent the 1000 or so
"inline.cpp(3) : warning C4141: 'inline' : used more than once" warnings that MS's cl.exe compiler emits without this patch, i.e. if inline is not the first keyword before a function name etc.
Prefer "inline [other inline related keyword]" over "[other related keyword] inline".
After this patch, libcxx should be consistent to this pattern.
llvm-svn: 191987
Eric Fiselier