On PowerPC64, when a function call offset is too large to encode in a call
instruction the address is stored in a table in the data segment. A thunk is
used to load the branch target address from the table relative to the
TOC-pointer and indirectly branch to the callee. When linking position-dependent
code the addresses are stored directly in the table, for position-independent
code the table is allocated and filled in at load time by the dynamic linker.
For position-independent code the branch targets could have gone in the .got.plt
but using the .branch_lt section for both position dependent and position
independent binaries keeps it consitent and helps keep this PPC64 specific logic
seperated from the target-independent code handling the .got.plt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53408
llvm-svn: 346877
The R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation type is given the R_PAGE_PC
RelExpr. This can be transformed to R_PLT_PAGE_PC via toPlt().
Unfortunately the resolution is identical to R_PAGE_PC so instead of
getting the address of the PLT entry we get the address of the symbol
which may not be correct in the case of static ifuncs. The fix is to
handle the cases separately and use getPltVA() + A with R_PLT_PAGE_PC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54474
llvm-svn: 346863
Summary:
NameTypeEntry::Type is a bit-packed value of CU index+attributes (https://sourceware.org/gdb//onlinedocs/gdb/Index-Section-Format.html), which is named cu_index_and_attrs in a local variable in gdb/dwarf2read.c:dw2_symtab_iter_next
The new name CuIndexAndAttrs is more meaningful.
Reviewers: ruiu, dblaikie, espindola
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arichardson, JDevlieghere, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54481
llvm-svn: 346794
Summary:
Idx passed to readPubNamesAndTypes was an index into Chunks, not an
index into the CU list. This would be incorrect if some .debug_info
section contained more than 1 DW_TAG_compile_unit.
In real world, glibc Scrt1.o is a partial link of start.os abi-note.o init.o and contains 2 CUs in debug builds.
Without this patch, any application linking such Scrt1.o would have invalid .gdb_index
The issue could be demonstrated by:
(gdb) py print(gdb.lookup_global_symbol('main'))
None
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: Higuoxing, grimar, dblaikie, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, JDevlieghere, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54361
llvm-svn: 346747
Summary:
The debug_info_offset value may be relocated.
This is lld side change of D54375.
Reviewers: ruiu, dblaikie, grimar, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54376
llvm-svn: 346616
Summary:
D53821 fixed the bogus MSVC (at least 2017) C4146 warning (unary minus applied on unsigned type)
by using std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::min().
The warning was because -2147483648 is incorrectly treated as unsigned long instead of long long)
Let's use INT32_MIN which is arguably more readable.
Note, on GCC or clang, -0x80000000 works fine (ILP64: long, LP64: long long).
Reviewers: ruiu, jhenderson, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54200
llvm-svn: 346356
Summary:
D52830 sets sh_link to .symtab in static link, which breaks executable stripped by GNU strip.
It may also be odd that .rela.plt (SHF_ALLOC) points to .symtab (non-SHF_ALLOC).
Change the logic on pcc's suggestion.
Before:
% clang -fuse-ld=lld -static -xc =(printf 'int main(){}') # or gcc
% strip a.out; ./a.out
unexpected reloc type in static binary[1] 61634 segmentation fault ./a.out
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: pcc, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53993
llvm-svn: 345899
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39493.
We crashed previously because did not handle /DISCARD/ properly
when -r was used. I think it is uncommon to use scripts with -r, though I see
nothing wrong to handle the /DISCARD/ so that we will not crash at least.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53864
llvm-svn: 345819
Summary:
There are really three different kinds of TLS layouts:
* A fixed TLS-to-TP offset. On architectures like PowerPC, MIPS, and
RISC-V, the thread pointer points to a fixed offset from the start
of the executable's TLS segment. The offset is 0x7000 for PowerPC
and MIPS, which allows a signed 16-bit offset to reach 0x1000 of
per-thread implementation data and 0xf000 of the application's TLS
segment. The size and layout of the TCB isn't relevant to the static
linker and might not be known.
* A fixed TCB size. This is the format documented as "variant 1" in
Ulrich Drepper's TLS spec. The thread pointer points to a 2-word TCB
followed by the executable's TLS segment. The first word is always
the DTV pointer. Used on ARM. The thread pointer must be aligned to
the TLS segment's alignment, possibly creating alignment padding.
* Variant 2. This format predates variant 1 and is also documented in
Drepper's TLS spec. It allocates the executable's TLS segment before
the thread pointer, apparently for backwards-compatibility. It's
used on x86 and SPARC.
Factor out an lld:🧝:getTlsTpOffset() function for use in a
follow-up patch for Android. The TcbSize/TlsTpOffset fields are only used
in getTlsTpOffset, so replace them with a switch on Config->EMachine.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Reviewed By: ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Subscribers: jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, atanasyan, PkmX, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53905
llvm-svn: 345775
Summary: .rela.plt may only contain R_*_{,I}RELATIVE relocations and not need a symbol table link. bfd/gold fallbacks to sh_link=0 in this case. Without this patch, ld.lld --strip-all caused lld to dereference a null pointer.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53881
llvm-svn: 345648
Visual Studio has a bug where it converts the integer literal 2147483648
into an unsigned int instead of a long long (i.e. it follows C89 rules).
The bug has been reported as:
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/141813/-2147483648-c4146-error.html.
Because of this bug, we were getting a signed/unsigned comparison
warning in VS2015 from the old code (the subsequent unary negation had
no effect on the type).
Reviewed by: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53821
llvm-svn: 345579
Summary: There are too many reasonable cases that would be considered unorderable.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola, Bigcheese
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: grimar, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53669
llvm-svn: 345322
Out::DebugInfo was used only by GdbIndex class to determine if
we need to create a .gdb_index section, but we can do the same
check without it.
Added a test that this patch doesn't change the existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 345058
Summary:
During upgrading of the FreeBSD source tree with lld 7.0.0, I noticed
that it started complaining about `crt1.o` having an "index past the
end of the symbol table".
Such a symbol table looks approximately like this, viewed with `readelf
-s` (note the `Ndx` field being messed up):
```
Symbol table '.symtab' contains 4 entries:
Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
0: 00000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND
1: 00000000 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT 1
2: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN RSV[0xffff] __rel_iplt_end
3: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN RSV[0xffff] __rel_iplt_start
```
At first, it seemed that recent ifunc relocation work had caused this:
<https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS339351>, but it turned out that it was
due to incorrect processing of the object files by lld, when using `-r`
(a.k.a. --relocatable).
Bisecting showed that rL324421 ("Convert a use of Config->Static") was
the commit where this new behavior began. Simply reverting it solved
the issue, and the `__rel_iplt` symbols had an index of `UND` again.
Looking at Rafael's commit message, I think he simply missed the
possibility of `--relocatable` being in effect, so I have added an
additional check for it.
I also added a simple regression test case.
Reviewers: grimar, ruiu, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: arichardson, krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53515
llvm-svn: 345002
We need this to support 32-bit ARM. Add test cases for emulation
handling for this architecture as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53539
llvm-svn: 344976
Summary:
Before, superfluous warnings were emitted for the following two cases:
1) When from symbol was in a discarded section.
The profile should be thought of as affiliated to the section.
It makes sense to ignore the profile if the section is discarded.
2) When to symbol was in a shared object.
The object file containing the profile may not know about the to
symbol, which can reside in another object file (useful profile) or a
shared object (not useful as symbols in the shared object are fixed
and unorderable). It makes sense to ignore the profile from the object
file.
Note, the warning when to symbol was undefined was suppressed in
D53044, which is still useful for --symbol-ordering-file=
This patch silences the warnings. The check is actually more relaxed (no
warnings if either From or To is not Defined) for simplicity and I don't
see a compelling reason to warn on more cases.
Reviewers: ruiu, davidxl, espindola, Bigcheese
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53470
llvm-svn: 344974
This patch adds a support for OUTPUT_FORMAT linker script directive.
Since I'm not 100% confident with BFD names you can use in the directive
for all architectures, I added only a few in this patch. We can add
other names for other archtiectures later.
We still do not support triple-style OUTPUT_FORMAT directive, namely,
OUTPUT_FORMAT(bfdname, big, little). If you pass -EL (little endian)
or -EB (big endian) to the linker, GNU linkers pick up big or little
as a BFD name, correspondingly, so that you can use a single linker
script for bi-endian processor. I'm not sure if we really need to
support that, so I'll leave it alone for now.
Note that -m takes precedence over OUTPUT_FORAMT, but we always parse
a BFD name given to OUTPUT_FORMAT for error checking. You cannot write
an invalid name in the OUTPUT_FORMAT directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53495
llvm-svn: 344952
Summary:
SymbolTable::addAbsolute() was removed in rL344305.
To me this is more readable than the lambda named `Add` and in our
out-of-tree CHERI target we use addAbsolute() in another function.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: kristina, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53393
llvm-svn: 344842
Adjusted the range check on a call instruction from 24 bits signed to
26 bits signed. While the instruction only encodes 24 bits, the target is
assumed to be 4 byte aligned, and the value that is encoded in the instruction
gets shifted left by 2 to form the offset. Also added a check that the offset is
indeed at least 4 byte aligned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53401
llvm-svn: 344747
Recommitting https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544 after fixing undefined behavior
from left-shifting a negative value. Original commit message:
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
llvm-svn: 344622
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544, which causes failures on
a undefined behaviour sanitizer bot -->
lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp:849:35: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1
llvm-svn: 344551