However, they also contain fallback logic that - in cases where LLDB can't recognize the specific subclass - actually does run code in order to inspect those objects.
The argument for this logic was that these data types are critical enough that the risk of getting it wrong is outweighed by the advantage of always providing accurate child information.
Practical experience however shows that "po" - a code running data-inspection command - is quite frequently used, and not considered burdensome by users.
As such, this makes the code-running fallback in the data formatters a risk that carries very little actual reward. Also, unlike the time this code was originally written, we now have accurate class information for Objective-C, and thus we are less likely to improperly identify classes.
This commit removes support for the code-running fallback, and aligns the data formatters for NSArray, NSDictionary and NSSet to the general no-code-running behavior of other data formatters.
While it is possible for us to add support for some subclasses that are now no longer covered by static inspection alone, this is beyond the scope of this commit.
llvm-svn: 260664
clearing the map ended up calling back into the TypeSystemMap to do lookups.
Not a good idea, and in this case it would cause a deadlock.
You would only see this when replacing the target contents after an exec, and only if you
had stopped before the exec, evaluated an expression, then continued
on to the point where you did the exec.
Fixed this by making sure the TypeSystemMap::Clear tears down the TypeSystems in the map before clearing the map.
I also add an expression before exec to the TestExec.py so that we'll catch this
issue if it crops up again in the future.
<rdar://problem/24554920>
llvm-svn: 260624
assert(((SymbolFileDWARF*)m_ast.GetSymbolFile())->UserIDMatches(die.GetDIERef().GetUID()) &&
"Adding incorrect type to forward declaration map");
The problem is that "m_ast.GetSymbolFile()" can return a SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap. The code is doing the right thing if the assertion is ignored.
<rdar://problem/24437972>
llvm-svn: 260618
In some circumstances (notably, certain minidumps), the thread CONTEXT does not have values for the
control registers (EIP, ESP, EBP, EFLAGS). There are flags in the CONTEXT which indicate which
portions are valid, but those flags weren't checked. The old code would not detect this and give a
garbage value for the register. The new code will log the problem and return an error.
I consolidated the error checking and logging into a helper function, which makes the big switch
statement easier to read and verify.
Ran tests to ensure this doesn't break anything. Manually verified that a minidump without info on
the control registers now indicates the problem instead of giving bad information.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17152
llvm-svn: 260559
This patch reworks the function argument reading code, allowing us to annotate arguments with their types. The type/size information is needed to correctly parse arguments passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 260525
short option as an aid to memory. Like it's w because of the W in throW.
That helps me remember. If we are going to take these out we should take them
all out. But I kind of like them.
llvm-svn: 260452
We already do this for Objective-C interfaces, but we never handled protocols
because the DWARF didn't represent them. Nowadays, though, we can import them
from modules, and we have to mark them properly.
<rdar://problem/24193009>
llvm-svn: 260445
llvm::DenseSet<lldb_private::SymbolFile *> &searched_symbol_files
Each time a SymbolFile::FindTypes() is called, it needs to check the searched_symbol_files list to make sure it hasn't already been asked to find the type and return immediately if it has been checked. This will stop circular dependencies from also crashing LLDB during type queries.
This has proven to be an issue when debugging large applications on MacOSX that use DWARF in .o files.
<rdar://problem/24581488>
llvm-svn: 260434
* Generate artificial symbol names from eh_fame during symbol parsing
so these symbols are already present when we calcualte the size of
the symbols where 0 is specified.
* Fix symbol size calculation for the last symbol in the file where
it have to last until the end of the parent section.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16996
llvm-svn: 260369
The IT instruction can specify condition code for up to 4 consecutive
instruction and it is used quite often by clang in epilogues causing
an issue when trying to unwind from locations covered by the IT
instruction and for locatins inmediately after the IT instruction.
Changes made to fix it:
* Introduce the concept of conditional instruction block what is a list
of consecutive instructions with the same condition. We update the
unwind information during the conditional instruction block and when
we reach the end of it (first instruction with a differemt condition)
then we restore the unwind information we had before the condition.
* Fix a bug in the ARM instruction emulator where neither PC nor the
ITSTATE was advanced when we reached an instruction what we can't
decode.
After the change we have no regression on android-arm running the
regular test suit and TestStandardUnwind also passes when running it
with clang as the compiler (previously it failed on an IT instruction).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16814
llvm-svn: 260368
The UDF instruction is deprecated in armv7 and in case of thumb2
instructions set it don't work well together with the IT instruction.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16853
llvm-svn: 260367
case where you have:
1 -> foo (bar(),
2 baz(),
3 lala());
4
You are sitting on line 1, and want to step into foo, but not bar, baz & lala. Unfortunately
there are line table entries for lines 1-3, and lldb doesn't know anything about the nesting
of statement in these lines. So we'll have to use the user's intelligence... This patch adds:
(lldb) thread step-in -t foo --end-line 4
That tells lldb to keep stepping in till line 4, but stop if you step into foo. I think I would
remember to use this when faced with some of the long gnarly call sequences in lldb. But there
might be ways I haven't thought of to make it more convenient. Jason suggests having "end" as a
special token for --end-line which just means keep going to the end of the function, I really want
to get into this thing...
There should be an SB API and tests, which will come if this seems useful.
llvm-svn: 260352
The explicit APIs on SBValue obviously remain if one wants to be explicit in intent, or override this guess, but since __int__() has to pick one, an educated guess is definitely better than than always going to signed regardless
Fixes rdar://24556976
llvm-svn: 260349
CFLAGS is now being set correctly to pass -flimit-debug-info or
-fno-limit-debug-info on FreeBSD. I'm not sure which change is
responsible for the fix, though.
llvm.org/pr25626
llvm-svn: 260330
1) Turns out we weren't correctly uniquing types for C++. We would search our repository for "lldb_private::Process", but yet store just "Process" in the unique type map. Now we store things correctly and correctly unique types.
2) SymbolFileDWARF::CompleteType() can be called at any time in order to complete a C++ or Objective C class. All public inquiries into the SymbolFile go through SymbolVendor, and SymbolVendor correctly takes the module lock before it call the SymbolFile API call, but when we let CompilerType objects out in the wild, they can complete themselves at any time from the expression parser, so the ValueObjects or (SBValue objects in the public API), and many more places. So we now take the module lock when completing a type to avoid two threads being in the SymbolFileDWARF at the same time.
3) If a class has a template member function like:
class A
{
<template T>
void Foo(T t);
};
The DWARF will _only_ contain a DW_TAG_subprogram for "Foo" if anyone specialized it. This would cause a class definition for A inside a.cpp that used a "int" and "float" overload to look like:
class A
{
void Foo(int t);
void Foo(double t);
};
And a version from b.cpp that used a "float" overload to look like:
class A
{
void Foo(float t);
};
And a version from c.cpp that use no overloads to look like:
class A
{
};
Then in an expression if you have two variables, one name "a" from a.cpp in liba.dylib, and one named "b" from b.cpp in libb.dylib, you will get conflicting definitions for "A" and your expression will fail. This all stems from the fact that DWARF _only_ emits template specializations, not generic definitions, and they are only emitted if they are used. There are two solutions to this:
a) When ever you run into ANY class, you must say "just because this class doesn't have templatized member functions, it doesn't mean that any other instances might not have any, so when ever I run into ANY class, I must parse all compile units and parse all instances of class "A" just in case it has member functions that are templatized.". That is really bad because it means you always pull in ALL DWARF that contains most likely exact duplicate definitions of the class "A" and you bloat the memory that the SymbolFileDWARF plug-in uses in LLDB (since you pull in all DIEs from all compile units that contain a "A" definition) uses for little value most of the time.
b) Modify DWARF to emit generic template member function definitions so that you know from looking at any instance of class "A" wether it has template member functions or not. In order to do this, we would have to have the ability to correctly parse a member function template, but there is a compiler bug:
<rdar://problem/24515533> [PR 26553] C++ Debug info should reference DW_TAG_template_type_parameter
This bugs means that not all of the info needed to correctly make a template member function is in the DWARF. The main source of the problem is if we have DWARF for a template instantiation for "int" like: "void A::Foo<int>(T)" the DWARF comes out as "void A::Foo<int>(int)" (it doesn't mention type "T", it resolves the type to the specialized type to "int"). But if you actually have your function defined as "<template T> void Foo(int t)" and you only use T for local variables inside the function call, we can't correctly make the function prototype up in the clang::ASTContext.
So the best we can do for now we just omit all member functions that are templatized from the class definition so that "A" never has any template member functions. This means all defintions of "A" look like:
class A
{
};
And our expressions will work. You won't be able to call template member fucntions in expressions (not a regression, we weren't able to do this before) and if you are stopped in a templatized member function, we won't know that are are in a method of class "A". All things we should fix, but we need <rdar://problem/24515533> fixed first, followed by:
<rdar://problem/24515624> Classes should always include a template subprogram definition, even when no template member functions are used
before we can do anything about it in LLDB.
This bug mainly fixed the following Apple radar:
<rdar://problem/24483905>
llvm-svn: 260308
Summary: This also fixes an infinite recursion between lldb_private::operator>> () and Scalar::operator>>= ().
Reviewers: sagar, tberghammer, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16868
Patch by Marianne Mailhot-Sarrasin
llvm-svn: 260239
This is because PyThreadState_Get() assumes a non-NULL thread state and crashes otherwise; but PyThreadState_GET is just a shortcut (in non-Python-debugging builds) for the global variable that holds the thread state
The behavior of CTRL+C is slightly more erratic than one would like. CTRL+C in the middle of execution of Python code will cause that execution to be interrupted (e.g. time.sleep(1000)), but a CTRL+C at the prompt will just cause a KeyboardInterrupt and not exit the interpreter - worse, it will only trigger the exception once one presses ENTER.
None of this is optimal, of course, but I don't have a lot of time to appease the Python deities with the proper spells right now, and fixing the crasher is already a good thing in and of itself
llvm-svn: 260199
This removes the following decorators:
* skipIfI386
* expectedFailureI386
* expectedFailurex86_64
* skipIfArch
* skipUnlessArch
* skipUnlessI386
And other related decorators. All code using those decorators
is updated to use expectedFailureAll and skipIf
llvm-svn: 260178
* Change the `not_in` function to be called `no_match`. This makes
it clear that keyword arguments can be more than just lists.
* Change the name of `_check_list_or_lambda` to
`_match_decorator_property`. Again clarifying that decorator params
are not always lists.
* Always use a regex match when matching strings. This allows automatic
support for regex matching on all decorator properties. Also support
compiled regex values.
* Fix a bug in the compiler check used by _decorateTest. The two
arguments were reversed, the condition was always wrong.
* Change one test that uses skipUnlessArch to use skipIf, to
demonstrate that skipIf can now handle more scenarios.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16938
llvm-svn: 260135
expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general
expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally,
by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue
of having to support decorators that can be called with or without
arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments,
and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition
you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation
of the decorators can become much simpler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936
llvm-svn: 260134
Enrico Granata