Fix bugs where we would compute out of bounds as in bounds, and where
we couldn't know that the linker could override the size of an array.
Add a few new testcases, change existing testcase to use a private
global array instead of extern.
llvm-svn: 95283
a different return type. While we don't emit any errors (yet), at
least we avoid cases where we might crash because of an assertion
failure later on (when the return type differs from what is expected).
llvm-svn: 95268
void f(int a = 10) {
return a;
}
would always return 10, regardless of the passed in argument.
This fixes another 600 test failures. We're now down to only 137 failures!
llvm-svn: 95262
doing so invalidates the file guard optimization and is not
in the spirit of "#if 0" because it is supposed to completely
skip everything, even if it isn't lexically valid. Patch by
Abramo Bagnara!
llvm-svn: 95253
Lock prefix, Repeat string operation prefixes and the Segment override prefixes.
Also added versions of the move string and store string instructions without the
repeat prefixes to X86InstrInfo.td. And finally marked the rep versions of
move/store string records in X86InstrInfo.td as isCodeGenOnly = 1 so tblgen is
happy building the disassembler files.
llvm-svn: 95252
1-argument ExecutionEngine::create(Module*) ambiguous with the signature that
used to be ExecutionEngine::create(ModuleProvider*, defaulted_params). Fixed
by removing the 1-argument create(). Fixes PR6221.
llvm-svn: 95236
The SRThreshold value makes perfect sense for checking if an entire aggregate
should be promoted to a scalar integer, but it is not so good for splitting
an aggregate into its separate elements. A struct may contain a large embedded
array along with some scalar fields that would benefit from being split apart
by SROA. Even if the total aggregate size is large, it may still be good to
perform SROA. Thus, the most important piece of this patch is simply moving
the aggregate size comparison vs. SRThreshold so that it guards only the
aggregate promotion.
We have also been checking the number of elements to decide if an aggregate
should be split up. The limit of "SRThreshold/4" seemed rather arbitrary,
and I don't think it's very useful to derive this limit from SRThreshold
anyway. I've collected some data showing that the current default limit of
32 (since SRThreshold defaults to 128) is a reasonable cutoff for struct
types. One thing suggested by the data is that distinguishing between structs
and arrays might be useful. There are (obviously) a lot more large arrays
than large structs (as measured by the number of elements and not the total
size -- a large array inside a struct still counts as a single element given
the way we do SROA right now). Out of 8377 arrays where we successfully
performed SROA while compiling a large set of benchmarks, only 16 of them had
more than 8 elements. And, for those 16 arrays, it's not at all clear that
SROA was actually beneficial. So, to offset the compile time cost of
investigating more large structs for SROA, the patch lowers the limit on array
elements to 8.
This fixes Apple Radar 7563690.
llvm-svn: 95224
Eric Christopher