One unusual feature of the z architecture is that the result of a
previous load can be reused indefinitely for subsequent loads, even if
a cache-coherent store to that location is performed by another CPU.
A special serializing instruction must be used if you want to force
a load to be reattempted.
Since volatile loads are not supposed to be omitted in this way,
we should insert a serializing instruction before each such load.
The same goes for atomic loads.
The patch implements this at the IR->DAG boundary, in a similar way
to atomic fences. It is a no-op for targets other than SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 196906
One unusual feature of the z architecture is that the result of a
previous load can be reused indefinitely for subsequent loads, even if
a cache-coherent store to that location is performed by another CPU.
A special serializing instruction must be used if you want to force
a load to be reattempted.
Since volatile loads are not supposed to be omitted in this way,
we should insert a serializing instruction before each such load.
The same goes for atomic loads.
The patch implements this at the IR->DAG boundary, in a similar way
to atomic fences. It is a no-op for targets other than SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 196905
Since z has no setcc instruction as such, the choice of setBooleanContents
is a bit arbitrary. Currently it's set to ZeroOrOneBooleanContent,
so we produced a branch-free form when selecting between 0 and 1,
but not when selecting between 0 and -1. This patch handles the latter
case too.
At some point I'd like to measure whether it's better to use conditional
moves for constant selects on z196, but that's future work.
llvm-svn: 196578
The backend converts 64-bit ORs into subreg moves if the upper 32 bits
of one operand and the low 32 bits of the other are known to be zero.
It then tries to peel away redundant ANDs from the upper 32 bits.
Since AND masks are canonicalized to exclude known-zero bits,
the test ORs the mask and the known-zero bits together before
checking for redundancy. The problem was that it was using the
wrong node when checking for known-zero bits, so could drop ANDs
that were still needed.
llvm-svn: 196267
add_public_tablegen_target adds *CommonTableGen to LLVM_COMMON_DEPENDS.
LLVM_COMMON_DEPENDS affects add_llvm_library (and other add_target stuff) within its scope.
llvm-svn: 195927
We would wrongly transform the testcase into the equivalent of an AND with 1.
The problem was that, when testing whether the shifted-in bits of the right
shift were significant, we used the width of the final zero-extended result
rather than the width of the shifted value.
llvm-svn: 195731
I've no idea why I decided to handle TMxx differently from all the other
high/low logic operations, but it was a stupid thing to do. The high
registers aren't available as separate 32-bit registers on z10,
so subreg_h32 can't be used on a GR64 there.
I've normally been testing with z196 and with -O3 and so hadn't noticed
this until now.
llvm-svn: 195473
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
As on other hosts, the CPU identification instruction is priveleged,
so we need to look through /proc/cpuinfo. I copied the PowerPC way of
handling "generic".
Several tests were implicitly assuming z10 and so failed on z196.
llvm-svn: 193742
useAA significantly improves the handling of vector code that has TBAA
information attached. It also helps other cases, as shown by the testsuite
changes here. The only real downside I've seen is that it interferes with
MergeConsecutiveStores. The problem is that that optimization works top
down, starting at the first store in the chain, and looks for cases where
the chain result is only used by a single related store. These related
stores don't alias, so useAA will have rewritten all the later stores to
use a different chain input (typically the same one as the first store).
I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages though, so for now I've
just disabled alias analysis for the unaligned-01.ll test.
llvm-svn: 193521
We previously used the default expansion to SELECT_CC, which in turn would
expand to "LHI; BRC; LHI". In most cases it's better to use an IPM-based
sequence instead.
llvm-svn: 192784
This patch fixes an old FIXME by creating a MCTargetStreamer interface
and moving the target specific functions for ARM, Mips and PPC to it.
The ARM streamer is still declared in a common place because it is
used from lib/CodeGen/ARMException.cpp, but the Mips and PPC are
completely hidden in the corresponding Target directories.
I will send an email to llvmdev with instructions on how to use this.
llvm-svn: 192181
Floats are stored in the high 32 bits of an FPR, and the only GPR<->FPR
transfers are full-register transfers. This patch optimizes GPR<->FPR
float transfers when the high word of a GPR is directly accessible.
llvm-svn: 191764
This just adds the basics necessary for allocating the upper words to
virtual registers (move, load and store). The move support is parameterised
in a way that makes it easy to handle zero extensions, but the associated
zero-extend patterns are added by a later patch.
The easiest way of testing this seemed to be add a new "h" register
constraint for high words. I don't expect the constraint to be useful
in real inline asms, but it should work, so I didn't try to hide it
behind an option.
llvm-svn: 191739
Originally committed as r191661, but reverted because it changed the matching
order of comparisons on some hosts. That should have been fixed by r191735.
llvm-svn: 191738
For some reason, adding definitions for these load and store
instructions changed whether some of the build bots matched
comparisons as signed or unsigned.
llvm-svn: 191663
The only thing this does on its own is make the definitions of RISB[HL]G
a bit more precise. Those instructions are only used by the MC layer at
the moment, so no behavioral change is intended. The class is needed by
later patches though.
llvm-svn: 191660
Use subreg_hNN and subreg_lNN for the high and low NN bits of a register.
List the low registers first, so that subreg_l32 also means the low 32
bits of a 128-bit register.
Floats are stored in the upper 32 bits of a 64-bit register, so they
should use subreg_h32 rather than subreg_l32.
No behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 191659
I'm about to add support for high-word operations, so it seemed better
for the low-word registers to have names like R0L rather than R0W.
No behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 191655
The backend tries to use block operations like MVC, NC, OC and XC for
simple scalar operations. For correctness reasons, it rejects any case
in which the regions might partially overlap. However, for performance
reasons, it should also reject cases where the regions might be equal,
since the instruction might then not use the fast path.
This fixes a performance regression seen in bzip2. We may want to limit
the optimisation even more in future, or even remove it entirely, but I'll
try with this for now.
llvm-svn: 191525
The backend previously folded offsets into PC-relative addresses
whereever possible. That's the right thing to do when the address
can be used directly in a PC-relative memory reference (using things
like LRL). But if we have a register-based memory reference and need
to load the PC-relative address separately, it's better to use an anchor
point that could be shared with other accesses to the same area of the
variable.
Fixes a FIXME.
llvm-svn: 191524
Another patch to avoid duplication of encoding information. Things like
NILF, NILL and NILH are used as both 32-bit and 64-bit instructions.
Here the 64-bit versions are defined as aliases of the 32-bit ones.
llvm-svn: 191369
Similar to r191364, but for calls. This patch also removes the shortening
of BRASL to BRAS within a TU. Doing that was a bit controversial internally,
since there's a strong expectation with the z assembler that WYWIWYG.
llvm-svn: 191366
Another patch to reduce the duplication of encoding information.
Rather than define separate patterns for truncating 64-bit stores,
use the 32-bit stores with a subreg. No behavioral changed intended.
llvm-svn: 191365
This is the first of a few patches to reduce the dupliation of encoding
information. The return instruction is a normal BR in which one of the
registers is fixed.
llvm-svn: 191364
When loading immediates into a GR32, the port prefered LHI, followed by
LLILH or LLILL, followed by IILF. LHI and IILF are natural 32-bit
operations, but LLILH and LLILL also clear the upper 32 bits of the register.
This was represented as taking a 32-bit subreg of a 64-bit assignment.
Using subregs for something as simple as a move immediate was probably
a bad idea. Also, I have patches to add support for the high-word facility,
and we don't want something like LLILH and LLILL to stop the high word of
the same GPR from being used.
This patch therefore uses LHI and IILF to begin with and adds a late
machine-specific pass to use LLILH and LLILL if the other half of the
register is not live. The high-word patches extend this behavior to
IIHF, LLIHL and LLIHH.
No behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 191363
Previously, the DAGISel function WalkChainUsers was spotting that it
had entered already-selected territory by whether a node was a
MachineNode (amongst other things). Since it's fairly common practice
to insert MachineNodes during ISelLowering, this was not the correct
check.
Looking around, it seems that other nodes get their NodeId set to -1
upon selection, so this makes sure the same thing happens to all
MachineNodes and uses that characteristic to determine whether we
should stop looking for a loop during selection.
This should fix PR15840.
llvm-svn: 191165
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 190930
The port originally had special patterns for extload, mapping them to the
same instructions as sextload. It seemed neater to have patterns that
match "an extension that is allowed to be signed" and "an extension that
is allowed to be unsigned".
This was originally meant to be a clean-up, but it does improve the handling
of promoted integers a little, as shown by args-06.ll.
llvm-svn: 190777
The 'Deprecated' class allows you to specify a SubtargetFeature that the
instruction is deprecated on.
The 'ComplexDeprecationPredicate' class allows you to define a custom
predicate that is called to check for deprecation.
For example:
ComplexDeprecationPredicate<"MCR">
would mean you would have to define the following function:
bool getMCRDeprecationInfo(MCInst &MI, MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
std::string &Info)
Which returns 'false' for not deprecated, and 'true' for deprecated
and store the warning message in 'Info'.
The MCTargetAsmParser constructor was chaned to take an extra argument of
the MCInstrInfo class, so out-of-tree targets will need to be changed.
llvm-svn: 190598
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
llvm-svn: 190400
We used to generate the compact unwind encoding from the machine
instructions. However, this had the problem that if the user used `-save-temps'
or compiled their hand-written `.s' file (with CFI directives), we wouldn't
generate the compact unwind encoding.
Move the algorithm that generates the compact unwind encoding into the
MCAsmBackend. This way we can generate the encoding whether the code is from a
`.ll' or `.s' file.
<rdar://problem/13623355>
llvm-svn: 190290
The architecture has many comparison instructions, including some that
extend one of the operands. The signed comparison instructions use sign
extensions and the unsigned comparison instructions use zero extensions.
In cases where we had a free choice between signed or unsigned comparisons,
we were trying to decide at lowering time which would best fit the available
instructions, taking things like extension type into account. The code
to do that was getting increasingly hairy and was also making some bad
decisions. E.g. when comparing the result of two LLCs, it is better to use
CR rather than CLR, since CR can be fused with a branch while CLR can't.
This patch removes the lowering code and instead adds an operand to
integer comparisons to say whether signed comparison is required,
whether unsigned comparison is required, or whether either is OK.
We can then leave the choice of instruction up to the normal isel code.
llvm-svn: 190138
For now this just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189819
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189469
Lengths up to a certain threshold (currently 6 * 256) use a series of MVCs.
Lengths above that threshold use a loop to handle X*256 bytes followed
by a single MVC to handle the excess (if any). This loop will also be
needed in future when support for variable lengths is added.
Because the same tablegen classes are used to define MVC and CLC,
the patch also has the side-effect of defining a pseudo loop instruction
for CLC. That instruction isn't used yet (and wouldn't be handled correctly
if it were). I'm planning to use it soon though.
llvm-svn: 189331
If we had a store of an integer to memory, and the integer and store size
were suitable for a form of MV..., we used MV... no matter what. We could
then have sequences like:
lay %r2, 0(%r3,%r4)
mvi 0(%r2), 4
In these cases it seems better to force the constant into a register
and use a normal store:
lhi %r2, 4
stc %r2, 0(%r3, %r4)
since %r2 is more likely to be hoisted and is easier to rematerialize.
llvm-svn: 189098
...so that it can be used for z too. Most of the code is the same.
The only real change is to use TargetTransformInfo to test when a sqrt
instruction is available.
The pass is opt-in because at the moment it only handles sqrt.
llvm-svn: 189097
The initial port used MLG(R) for i64 UMUL_LOHI but left the other three
combinations as not-legal-or-custom. Although 32x32->{32,32}
multiplications exist, they're not as quick as doing a normal 64-bit
multiplication, so it didn't seem like i32 SMUL_LOHI and UMUL_LOHI
would be useful. There's also no direct instruction for i64 SMUL_LOHI,
so it needs to be implemented in terms of UMUL_LOHI.
However, not defining these patterns means that we don't convert
division by a constant into multiplication, so this patch fills
in the other cases. The new i64 SMUL_LOHI sequence is simpler
than the one that we used previously for 64x64->128 multiplication,
so int-mul-08.ll now tests the full sequence.
llvm-svn: 188898
SystemZTargetLowering::emitStringWrapper() previously loaded the character
into R0 before the loop and made R0 live on entry. I'd forgotten that
allocatable registers weren't allowed to be live across blocks at this stage,
and it confused LiveVariables enough to cause a miscompilation of f3 in
memchr-02.ll.
This patch instead loads R0 in the loop and leaves LICM to hoist it
after RA. This is actually what I'd tried originally, but I went for
the manual optimisation after noticing that R0 often wasn't being hoisted.
This bug forced me to go back and look at why, now fixed as r188774.
We should also try to optimize null checks so that they test the CC result
of the SRST directly. The select between null and the SRST GPR result could
then usually be deleted as dead.
llvm-svn: 188779
For now this matches the equivalent of (neg (abs ...)), which did hit a few
times in projects/test-suite. We should probably also match cases where
absolute-like selects are used with reversed arguments.
llvm-svn: 188671
This first cut is pretty conservative. The final argument register (R6)
is call-saved, so we would need to make sure that the R6 argument to a
sibling call is the same as the R6 argument to the calling function,
which seems worth keeping as a separate patch.
Saying that integer truncations are free means that we no longer
use the extending instructions LGF and LLGF for spills in int-conv-09.ll
and int-conv-10.ll. Instead we treat the registers as 64 bits wide and
truncate them to 32-bits where necessary. I think it's unlikely we'd
use LGF and LLGF for spills in other situations for the same reason,
so I'm removing the tests rather than replacing them. The associated
code is generic and applies to many more instructions than just
LGF and LLGF, so there is no corresponding code removal.
llvm-svn: 188669
Generalize r188163 to cope with return types other than MVT::i32, just
as the existing visitMemCmpCall code did. I've split this out into a
subroutine so that it can be used for other upcoming patches.
I also noticed that I'd used the wrong API to record the out chain.
It's a load that uses DAG.getRoot() rather than getRoot(), so the out
chain should go on PendingLoads. I don't have a testcase for that because
we don't do any interesting scheduling on z yet.
llvm-svn: 188540
r188163 used CLC to implement memcmp. Code that compares the result
directly against zero can test the CC value produced by CLC, but code
that needs an integer result must use IPM. The sequence I'd used was:
ipm <reg>
sll <reg>, 2
sra <reg>, 30
but I'd forgotten that this inverts the order, so that CC==1 ("less")
becomes an integer greater than zero, and CC==2 ("greater") becomes
an integer less than zero. This sequence should only be used if the
CLC arguments are reversed to compensate. The problem then is that
the branch condition must also be reversed when testing the CLC
result directly.
Rather than do that, I went for a different sequence that works with
the natural CLC order:
ipm <reg>
srl <reg>, 28
rll <reg>, <reg>, 31
One advantage of this is that it doesn't clobber CC. A disadvantage
is that any sign extension to 64 bits must be done separately,
rather than being folded into the shifts.
llvm-svn: 188538
This follows the same lines as the integer code. In the end it seemed
easier to have a second 4-bit mask in TSFlags to specify the compare-like
CC values. That eats one more TSFlags bit than adding a CCHasUnordered
would have done, but it feels more concise.
llvm-svn: 187883
Without explicit dependencies, both per-file action and in-CommonTableGen action could run in parallel.
It races to emit *.inc files simultaneously.
llvm-svn: 187780
This patch just uses a peephole test for "add; compare; branch" sequences
within a single block. The IR optimizers already convert loops to
decrement-and-branch-on-nonzero form in some cases, so even this
simplistic test triggers many times during a clang bootstrap and
projects/test-suite run. It looks like there are still cases where we
need to more strongly prefer branches on nonzero though. E.g. I saw a
case where a loop that started out with a check for 0 ended up with a
check for -1. I'll try to look at that sometime.
I ended up adding the Reference class because MachineInstr::readsRegister()
doesn't check for subregisters (by design, as far as I could tell).
llvm-svn: 187723
Perhaps predictably, doing comparison elimination on the fly during
SystemZLongBranch turned out to be a bad idea. The next patches make
use of LOAD AND TEST and BRANCH ON COUNT, both of which require
changes to earlier instructions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 187718
This also fixes a bug in the predication of LR to LOCR: I'd forgotten
that with these in-place instruction builds, the implicit operands need
to be added manually. I think this was latent until now, but is tested
by int-cmp-45.c. It also adds a CC valid mask to STOC, again tested by
int-cmp-45.c.
llvm-svn: 187573
Convert >= 1 to > 0, etc. Using comparison with zero isn't a win on its own,
but it exposes more opportunities for CC reuse (the next patch).
llvm-svn: 187571
The loop optimizers were assuming that scales > 1 were OK. I think this
is actually a bug in TargetLoweringBase::isLegalAddressingMode(),
since it seems to be trying to reject anything that isn't r+i or r+r,
but it has no default case for scales other than 0, 1 or 2. Implementing
the hook for z means that z can no longer test any change there though.
llvm-svn: 187497
Extend r187495 to conditional loads. I split this out because the
easiest way seemed to be to force a particular operand order in
SystemZISelDAGToDAG.cpp.
llvm-svn: 187496
System z branches have a mask to select which of the 4 CC values should
cause the branch to be taken. We can invert a branch by inverting the mask.
However, not all instructions can produce all 4 CC values, so inverting
the branch like this can lead to some oddities. For example, integer
comparisons only produce a CC of 0 (equal), 1 (less) or 2 (greater).
If an integer EQ is reversed to NE before instruction selection,
the branch will test for 1 or 2. If instead the branch is reversed
after instruction selection (by inverting the mask), it will test for
1, 2 or 3. Both are correct, but the second isn't really canonical.
This patch therefore keeps track of which CC values are possible
and uses this when inverting a mask.
Although this is mostly cosmestic, it fixes undefined behavior
for the CIJNLH in branch-08.ll. Another fix would have been
to mask out bit 0 when generating the fused compare and branch,
but the point of this patch is that we shouldn't need to do that
in the first place.
The patch also makes it easier to reuse CC results from other instructions.
llvm-svn: 187495
r187116 moved compare-and-branch generation from the instruction-selection
pass to the peephole optimizer (via optimizeCompare). It turns out that even
this is a bit too early. Fused compare-and-branch instructions don't
interact well with predication, where a CC result is needed. They also
make it harder to reuse the CC side-effects of earlier instructions
(not yet implemented, but the subject of a later patch).
Another problem was that the AnalyzeBranch family of routines weren't
handling compares and branches, so we weren't able to reverse the fused
form in cases where we would reverse a separate branch. This could have
been fixed by extending AnalyzeBranch, but given the other problems,
I've instead moved the fusing to the long-branch pass, which is also
responsible for the opposite transformation: splitting out-of-range
compares and branches into separate compares and long branches.
I've added a test for the AnalyzeBranch problem. A test for the
predication problem is included in the next patch, which fixes a bug
in the choice of CC mask.
llvm-svn: 187494
r186399 aggressively used the RISBG instruction for immediate ANDs,
both because it can handle some values that AND IMMEDIATE can't,
and because it allows the destination register to be different from
the source. I realized later while implementing the distinct-ops
support that it would be better to leave the choice up to
convertToThreeAddress() instead. The AND IMMEDIATE form is shorter
and is less likely to be cracked.
This is a problem for 32-bit ANDs because we assume that all 32-bit
operations will leave the high word untouched, whereas RISBG used in
this way will either clear the high word or copy it from the source
register. The patch uses the z196 instruction RISBLG for this instead.
This means that z10 will be restricted to NILL, NILH and NILF for
32-bit ANDs, but I think that should be OK for now. Although we're
using z10 as the base architecture, the optimization work is going
to be focused more on z196 and zEC12.
llvm-svn: 187492
Before the patch we took advantage of the fact that the compare and
branch are glued together in the selection DAG and fused them together
(where possible) while emitting them. This seemed to work well in practice.
However, fusing the compare so early makes it harder to remove redundant
compares in cases where CC already has a suitable value. This patch
therefore uses the peephole analyzeCompare/optimizeCompareInstr pair of
functions instead.
No behavioral change intended, but it paves the way for a later patch.
llvm-svn: 187116
These instructions are allowed to trap even if the condition is false,
so for now they are only used for "*ptr = (cond ? x : *ptr)"-style
constructs.
llvm-svn: 187111
This removes the need to store the asm variant in each row of the single table that existed before. Shaves ~16K off the size of X86AsmParser.o.
llvm-svn: 187026
The atomic tests assume the two-operand forms, so I've restricted them to z10.
Running and-01.ll, or-01.ll and xor-01.ll for z196 as well as z10 shows why
using convertToThreeAddress() is better than exposing the three-operand forms
first and then converting back to two operands where possible (which is what
I'd originally tried). Using the three-operand form first stops us from
taking advantage of NG, OG and XG for spills.
llvm-svn: 186683
This first step just adds definitions for SLLK, SRLK and SRAK.
The next patch will actually make use of them during codegen.
insn-bad.s tests that some form of error is reported when using these
instructions on z10. More work is needed to get the "instruction requires:
distinct-ops" that we'd ideally like, so I've stubbed that part out for now.
I'll come back and make it mandatory once the necessary changes are in.
llvm-svn: 186680
The original code only folded SRA into ROTATE ... SELECTED BITS
if there was no outer shift. This patch splits out that check
and generalises it slightly. The extra cases aren't really that
interesting, but this is paving the way for RNSBG support.
llvm-svn: 186571
In hindsight, using "RISBG" for something that can be any type of
R.SBG instruction was a bit confusing, so this renames it to RxSBG.
That might not be the best choice either, since there is an instruction
called RXSBG, but hopefully the lower-case letter stands out enough.
While there I fixed a couple of GNUisms that had crept in --
sorry about that!
llvm-svn: 186569
Another patch in the series to make more use of R.SBG. This one extends
r186072 and r186073 to handle cases where the AND is inside the shift.
llvm-svn: 186399
Normal (sext (setcc ...)) sequences are optimised into
(select_cc ..., -1, 0) by DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND.
However, this is deliberately not done for vectors, and after
vector type legalization we have (sext_inreg (setcc ...)) instead.
I wondered about trying to extend DAGCombiner to handle this case too,
but it seemed to be a loss on some other targets I tried, even those for
which SETCC isn't "legal" and SELECT_CC is.
llvm-svn: 186149
GPR and FPR constraints like "{r2}" and "{f2}" weren't handled correctly
because the name-to-regno mapping depends on the value type and
(because of that) the internal names in RegStrings are not the
same as the AsmName.
CC constraints like "{cc}" didn't work either because there was no
associated register class.
llvm-svn: 186148
If the source of these instructions is spilled we should load the destination.
If the destination is spilled we should store the source.
llvm-svn: 186147
RISBG can handle some ANDs for which no AND IMMEDIATE exists.
It also acts as a three-operand AND for some cases where an
AND IMMEDIATE could be used instead.
It might be worth adding a pass to replace RISBG with AND IMMEDIATE
in cases where the register operands end up being the same and where
AND IMMEDIATE is smaller.
llvm-svn: 186072
RISBG has three 8-bit operands (I3, I4 and I5). I'd originally
restricted all three to 6 bits, since that's the only range we intended
to use at the time. However, the top bit of I4 acts as a "zero" flag for
RISBG, while the top bit of I3 acts as a "test" flag for RNSBG & co.
This patch therefore allows them to have the full 8-bit range.
I've left the fifth operand as a 6-bit value for now since the
upper 2 bits have no defined meaning.
llvm-svn: 186070
in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
Look for patterns of the form (store (load ...), ...) in which the two
locations are known not to partially overlap. (Identical locations are OK.)
These sequences are better implemented by MVC unless either the load or
the store could use RELATIVE LONG instructions.
The testcase showed that we weren't using LHRL and LGHRL for extload16,
only sextloadi16. The patch fixes that too.
llvm-svn: 185919
Use "STC;MVC" for memsets that are too big for two STCs or MV...Is yet
small enough for a single MVC. As with memcpy, I'm leaving longer cases
till later.
The number of tests might seem excessive, but f33 & f34 from memset-04.ll
failed the first cut because I'd not added the "?:" on the calculation
of Size1.
llvm-svn: 185918
I was originally going to use MVC for memmove too, but that's less of
a clear win. Remove some accidental left-overs in the previous commit.
llvm-svn: 185804
The stack coloring pass has code to delete stores and loads that become
trivially dead after coloring. Extend it to cope with single instructions
that copy from one frame index to another.
The testcase happens to show an example of this kicking in at the moment.
It did occur in Real Code too though.
llvm-svn: 185705
This fixes foldMemoryOperandImpl() so that it doesn't create duplicated
frame MMOs. I hadn't realized when writing r185434 that it was the caller's
responsibility to add these.
No behavioural change intended.
llvm-svn: 185704
...now that the problem that prompted the restriction has been fixed.
The original spill-02.py was a compromise because at the time I couldn't
find an example that actually failed without the two scavenging slots.
The version included here did.
llvm-svn: 185701
This is another prerequisite for frame-to-frame MVC copies.
I'll commit the patch that makes use of the slot separately.
The downside of trying to test many corner cases with each of the
available addressing modes is that a fair few tests need to account
for the new frame layout. I do still think it's useful to have all
these tests though, since it's something that wouldn't get much coverage
otherwise.
llvm-svn: 185698
SystemZ wants normal register scavenging slots, as close to the stack or
frame pointer as possible. The only reason it was using custom code was
because PrologEpilogInserter assumed an x86-like layout, where the frame
pointer is at the opposite end of the frame from the stack pointer.
This meant that when frame pointer elimination was disabled,
the slots ended up being as close as possible to the incoming
stack pointer, which is the opposite of what we want on SystemZ.
This patch adds a new knob to say which layout is used and converts
SystemZ to use target-independent scavenging slots. It's one of the pieces
needed to support frame-to-frame MVCs, where two slots might be required.
The ABI requires us to allocate 160 bytes for calls, so one approach
would be to use that area as temporary spill space instead. It would need
some surgery to make sure that the slot isn't live across a call though.
I stuck to the "isFPCloseToIncomingSP - ..." style comment on the
"do what the surrounding code does" principle. The FP case is already
covered by several Systemz/frame-* tests, which fail without the
PrologueEpilogueInserter change, so no new ones are needed.
No behavioural change intended.
llvm-svn: 185696
Add a mapping from register-based <INSN>R instructions to the corresponding
memory-based <INSN>. Use it to cut down on the number of spill loads.
Some instructions extend their operands from smaller fields, so this
required a new TSFlags field to say how big the unextended operand is.
This optimisation doesn't trigger for C(G)R and CL(G)R because in practice
we always combine those instructions with a branch. Adding a test for every
other case probably seems excessive, but it did catch a missed optimisation
for DSGF (fixed in r185435).
llvm-svn: 185529
Rename Function->DispKey and PairType->DispSize. I'd originally used
"Function" because I thought it might be useful for other InstMappings.
However, it turns out that having two very similar instructions with the
same Function makes it pretty useless for anything other than the displacement
size key. Other InstMappings will want the key to be defined for only one
instruction in the pair.
No behavioural change intended.
llvm-svn: 185526
This is dead code since PIC16 was removed in 2010. The result was an odd mix,
where some parts would carefully pass it along and others would assert it was
zero (most of the object streamer for example).
llvm-svn: 185436
Fixes some cases where we were using full 64-bit division for (sdiv i32, i32)
and (sdiv i64, i32).
The "32" in "SDIVREM32" just refers to the second operand. The first operand
of all *DIVREM*s is a GR128.
llvm-svn: 185435
Try to use MVC when spilling the destination of a simple load or the source
of a simple store. As explained in the comment, this doesn't yet handle
the case where the load or store location is also a frame index, since
that could lead to two simultaneous scavenger spills, something the
backend can't handle yet. spill-02.py tests that this restriction kicks in,
but unfortunately I've not yet found a case that would fail without it.
The volatile trick I used for other scavenger tests doesn't work here
because we can't use MVC for volatile accesses anyway.
I'm planning on relaxing the restriction later, hopefully with a test
that does trigger the problem...
Tests @f8 and @f9 also showed that L(G)RL and ST(G)RL were wrongly
classified as SimpleBDX{Load,Store}. It wouldn't be easy to test for
that bug separately, which is why I didn't split out the fix as a
separate patch.
llvm-svn: 185434
This is the first use of D(L,B) addressing, which required a fair bit
of surgery. For that reason, the patch just adds the instruction
definition and the associated assembler and disassembler support.
A later patch will actually make use of it for codegen.
llvm-svn: 185433
Add pseudo conditional store instructions, so that we use:
branch foo:
store
foo:
instead of:
load
branch foo:
move
foo:
store
z196 has real 32-bit and 64-bit conditional stores, but we don't use
any z196 instructions yet.
llvm-svn: 185065
NOTE: If this broke your out-of-tree backend, in *RegisterInfo.td, change
the instances of SubRegIndex that have a comps template arg to use the
ComposedSubRegIndex class instead.
In TableGen land, this adds Size and Offset attributes to SubRegIndex,
and the ComposedSubRegIndex class, for which the Size and Offset are
computed by TableGen. This also adds an accessor in MCRegisterInfo, and
Size/Offsets for the X86 and ARM subreg indices.
llvm-svn: 183020
Unlike most -- hopefully "all other", but I'm still checking -- memory
instructions we support, LOAD REVERSED and STORE REVERSED may access
the memory location several times. This means that they are not suitable
for volatile loads and stores.
This patch is a prerequisite for better atomic load and store support.
The same principle applies there: almost all memory instructions we
support are inherently atomic ("block concurrent"), but LOAD REVERSED
and STORE REVERSED are exceptions.
Other instructions continue to allow volatile operands. I will add
positive "allows volatile" tests at the same time as the "allows atomic
load or store" tests.
llvm-svn: 183002
The code to distinguish between unaligned and aligned addresses was
already there, so this is mostly just a switch-on-and-test process.
llvm-svn: 182920
Fixes PR16146: gdb.base__call-ar-st.exp fails after
pre-RA-sched=source fixes.
Patch by Xiaoyi Guo!
This also fixes an unsupported dbg.value test case. Codegen was
previously incorrect but the test was passing by luck.
llvm-svn: 182885
This patch adds support for the CRJ and CGRJ instructions. Support for
the immediate forms will be a separate patch.
The architecture has a large number of comparison instructions. I think
it's generally better to concentrate on using the "best" comparison
instruction first and foremost, then only use something like CRJ if
CR really was the natual choice of comparison instruction. The patch
therefore opportunistically converts separate CR and BRC instructions
into a single CRJ while emitting instructions in ISelLowering.
llvm-svn: 182764
Previously, an invalid instruction like:
foo %r1, %r0
would generate the rather odd error message:
....: error: unknown token in expression
foo %r1, %r0
^
We now get the more informative:
....: error: invalid instruction
foo %r1, %r0
^
The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected.
We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead.
llvm-svn: 182644
The idea is to make sure that:
(1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister()
is called and the token obviously isn't a register.
(2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..."
sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense.
(3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where
the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.).
(4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type,
but is not a valid register pair.
Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative
instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from
that class are accepted.
(4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs)
and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that
requires a pair).
While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the
operand class.
llvm-svn: 182643
There was exactly one caller using this API right, the others were relying on
specific behavior of the default implementation. Since it's too hard to use it
right just remove it and standardize on the default behavior.
Defines away PR16132.
llvm-svn: 182636
Addresses a review comment from Ulrich Weigand. No functional change intended.
I'm not sure whether the old TODO that this patch touches still holds,
but that's something we'd get to when adding a targetted scheduling
description.
llvm-svn: 182474
The original version of the pass could underestimate the length of a backward
branch in cases like:
alignment to N bytes or more
...
relaxable branch A
...
foo: (aligned to M<N bytes)
...
bar: (aligned to N bytes)
...
relaxable branch B to foo
We don't add any misalignment gap for "bar" because N bytes of alignment
had already been reached earlier in the function. In this case, assuming
that A is relaxed can push "foo" closer to "bar", and make B appear to be
in range. Similar problems can occur for forward branches.
I don't think it's possible to create blocks with mixed alignments as
things stand, not least because we haven't yet defined getPrefLoopAlignment()
for SystemZ (that would need benchmarking). So I don't think we can test
this yet.
Thanks to Rafael Espíndola for spotting the bug.
llvm-svn: 182460
Before this change, the SystemZ backend would use BRCL for all branches
and only consider shortening them to BRC when generating an object file.
E.g. a branch on equal would use the JGE alias of BRCL in assembly output,
but might be shortened to the JE alias of BRC in ELF output. This was
a useful first step, but it had two problems:
(1) The z assembler isn't traditionally supposed to perform branch shortening
or branch relaxation. We followed this rule by not relaxing branches
in assembler input, but that meant that generating assembly code and
then assembling it would not produce the same result as going directly
to object code; the former would give long branches everywhere, whereas
the latter would use short branches where possible.
(2) Other useful branches, like COMPARE AND BRANCH, do not have long forms.
We would need to do something else before supporting them.
(Although COMPARE AND BRANCH does not change the condition codes,
the plan is to model COMPARE AND BRANCH as a CC-clobbering instruction
during codegen, so that we can safely lower it to a separate compare
and long branch where necessary. This is not a valid transformation
for the assembler proper to make.)
This patch therefore moves branch relaxation to a pre-emit pass.
For now, calls are still shortened from BRASL to BRAS by the assembler,
although this too is not really the traditional behaviour.
The first test takes about 1.5s to run, and there are likely to be
more tests in this vein once further branch types are added. The feeling
on IRC was that 1.5s is a bit much for a single test, so I've restricted
it to SystemZ hosts for now.
The patch exposes (and fixes) some typos in the main CodeGen/SystemZ tests.
A later patch will remove the {{g}}s from that directory.
llvm-svn: 182274
The GNU assembler treats things like:
brasl %r14, 100
in the same way as:
brasl %r14, .+100
rather than as a branch to absolute address 100. We implemented this in
LLVM by creating an immediate operand rather than the usual expr operand,
and by handling immediate operands specially in the code emitter.
This was undesirable for (at least) three reasons:
- the specialness of immediate operands was exposed to the backend MC code,
rather than being limited to the assembler parser.
- in disassembly, an immediate operand really is an absolute address.
(Note that this means reassembling printed disassembly can't recreate
the original code.)
- it would interfere with any assembly manipulation that we might
try in future. E.g. operations like branch shortening can change
the relative position of instructions, but any code that updates
sym+offset addresses wouldn't update an immediate "100" operand
in the same way as an explicit ".+100" operand.
This patch changes the implementation so that the assembler creates
a "." label for immediate PC-relative operands, so that the operand
to the MCInst is always the absolute address. The patch also adds
some error checking of the offset.
llvm-svn: 181773
Marking instructions as isAsmParserOnly stops them from being disassembled.
However, in cases where separate asm and codegen versions exist, we actually
want to disassemble to the asm ones.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 181772
The SystemZ port currently relies on the order of the instruction operands
matching the order of the instruction field lists. This isn't desirable
for disassembly, where the two are matched only by name. E.g. the R1 and R2
fields of an RR instruction should have corresponding R1 and R2 operands.
The main complication is that addresses are compound operands,
and as far as I know there is no mechanism to allow individual
suboperands to be selected by name in "let Inst{...} = ..." assignments.
Luckily it doesn't really matter though. The SystemZ instruction
encoding groups all address fields together in a predictable order,
so it's just as valid to see the entire compound address operand as
a single field. That's the approach taken in this patch.
Matching by name in turn means that the operands to COPY SIGN and
CONVERT TO FIXED instructions can be given in natural order.
(It was easier to do this at the same time as the rename,
since otherwise the intermediate step was too confusing.)
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 181771
The SystemZ port currently relies on the order of the instruction operands
matching the order of the instruction field lists. This isn't desirable
for disassembly, where the two are matched only by name. E.g. the R1 and R2
fields of an RR instruction should have corresponding R1 and R2 operands.
The main complication is that addresses are compound operands,
and as far as I know there is no mechanism to allow individual
suboperands to be selected by name in "let Inst{...} = ..." assignments.
Luckily it doesn't really matter though. The SystemZ instruction
encoding groups all address fields together in a predictable order,
so it's just as valid to see the entire compound address operand as
a single field. That's the approach taken in this patch.
Matching by name in turn means that the operands to COPY SIGN and
CONVERT TO FIXED instructions can be given in natural order.
(It was easier to do this at the same time as the rename,
since otherwise the intermediate step was too confusing.)
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 181769
NAKAMURA Takumi