- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
This range allows for performing many different operations on successor operands, including erasing/adding/setting. This removes the need for the explicit canEraseSuccessorOperand and eraseSuccessorOperand methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79077
This can help provide a common interface for view-like
ops so that for example Linalg's dependency analysis
can avoid relying on concrete ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78645
add_llvm_library() sometimes needs access to the dependencies in order to
generate new targets. Using DEPENDS allows this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78321
The Interface libraries were moved from Analysis, but declared in
cmake using add_llvm_library(). This breaks LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB
builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76463
HasNoSideEffect can now be implemented using the MemoryEffectInterface, removing the need to check multiple things for the same information. This also removes an easy foot-gun for users as 'Operation::hasNoSideEffect' would ignore operations that dynamically, or recursively, have no side effects. This also leads to an immediate improvement in some of the existing users, such as DCE, now that they have access to more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76036
Summary:
Interfaces/ is the designated directory for these types of interfaces, and also removes the need for including them directly in IR/.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75886
The interfaces themselves aren't really analyses, they may be used by analyses though. Having them in Analysis can also create cyclic dependencies if an analysis depends on a specific dialect, that also provides one of the interfaces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75867
Valentin Churavy