The comment here was introduced in
a3e01cf822 and suggests that we should
handle declaration statements and non-declaration statements the same,
but don't because ProhibitAttributes() can't handle GNU attributes. That
has recently changed, so remove the comment and handle all statements
the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99936
This changes our approach to processing statement attributes to be more
similar to how we process declaration attributes. Namely,
ActOnAttributedStmt() now calls ProcessStmtAttributes() instead of
vice-versa, and there is now an interface split between building an
attributed statement where you already have a list of semantic
attributes and building an attributed statement with attributes from
the parser.
This should make it easier to support statement attributes that are
dependent on a template. In that case, you would add a
TransformFooAttr() function in TreeTransform.h to perform the semantic
checking (morally similar to how Sema::InstantiateAttrs() already works
for declaration attributes) when transforming the semantic attribute at
instantiation time.
This line has a TODO comment, but the answer to it seems to be "no"
given that clang itself uses attributes on @try statements in its tests.
This ProhibitAttributes() statement is also dead code since
ProhibitAttributs() does not handle GNU attributes at the moment but
those are the only attributes valid in objc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97371
The condition variable is in scope in the loop increment, so we need to
emit the jump destination from wthin the scope of the condition
variable.
For GCC compatibility (and compatibility with real-world 'FOR_EACH'
macros), 'continue' is permitted in a statement expression within the
condition of a for loop, though, so there are two cases here:
* If the for loop has no condition variable, we can emit the jump
destination before emitting the condition.
* If the for loop has a condition variable, we must defer emitting the
jump destination until after emitting the variable. We diagnose a
'continue' appearing in the initializer of the condition variable,
because it would jump past the initializer into the scope of that
variable.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98816
Somewhat surprisingly, signature help is emitted as a side-effect of
computing the expected type of a function argument.
The reason is that both actions require enumerating the possible
function signatures and running partial overload resolution, and doing
this twice would be wasteful and complicated.
Change #1: document this, it's subtle :-)
However, sometimes we need to compute the expected type without having
reached the code completion cursor yet - in particular to allow
completion of designators.
eb4ab3358c did this but introduced a
regression - it emits signature help in the wrong location as a side-effect.
Change #2: only emit signature help if the code completion cursor was reached.
Currently there is PP.isCodeCompletionReached(), but we can't use it
because it's set *after* running code completion.
It'd be nice to set this implicitly when the completion token is lexed,
but ConsumeCodeCompletionToken() makes this complicated.
Change #3: call cutOffParsing() *first* when seeing a completion token.
After this, the fact that the Sema::Produce*SignatureHelp() functions
are even more confusing, as they only sometimes do that.
I don't want to rename them in this patch as it's another large
mechanical change, but we should soon.
Change #4: prepare to rename ProduceSignatureHelp() to GuessArgumentType() etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98488
Before this commit, expression statements could not be annotated
with statement attributes. Whenever parser found attribute, it
unconditionally assumed that it was followed by a declaration.
This not only doesn't allow expression attributes to have attributes,
but also produces spurious error diagnostics.
In order to maintain all previously compiled code, we still assume
that GNU attributes are followed by declarations unless ALL of those
are statement attributes. And even in this case we are not forcing
the parser to think that it should parse a statement, but rather
let it proceed as if no attributes were found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93630
The attribute definition claimed the attribute was inheritable (which
only applies to declaration attributes) and not a statement attribute.
Further, it treats subject appertainment errors as being parse errors
rather than semantic errors, which leads to us accepting invalid code.
For instance, we currently fail to reject:
void foo() {
int i = 1000;
__attribute__((nomerge, opencl_unroll_hint(8)))
if (i) { foo(); }
}
This addresses the issues by clarifying that opencl_unroll_hint is a
statement attribute and handles its appertainment checks in the
semantic layer instead of the parsing layer. This changes the output of
the diagnostic text to be more consistent with other appertainment
errors.
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
This change implements pragma STDC FENV_ROUND, which is introduced by
the extension to standard (TS 18661-1). The pragma is implemented only
in frontend, it sets apprpriate state of FPOptions stored in Sema. Use
of these bits in constant evaluation adn/or code generator is not in the
scope of this change.
Parser issues warning on unsuppored pragma when it encounteres pragma
STDC FENV_ROUND, however it makes syntax checks and updates Sema state
as if the pragma were supported.
Primary purpose of the partial implementation is to facilitate
development of non-default floating poin environment. Previously a
developer cannot set non-default rounding mode in sources, this mades
preparing tests for say constant evaluation substantially complicated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86921
For example:
#define FOO(x) (x)
FOO({});
... forms a statement-expression after macro expansion. This warning
applies to '({' and '})' delimiting statement-expressions, '[[' and ']]'
delimiting attributes, and '::*' introducing a pointer-to-member.
The warning for forming these compound tokens across macro expansions
(or across files!) is enabled by default; the warning for whitespace
within the tokens is not, but is included in -Wall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86751
If an `if` statement uses braces for its `then` block, suggest braces for the `else` and `else if` completion blocks, Otherwise don't suggest them.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82626
Summary:
Right now it is a '<invalid sloc>' for cases like this.
CounterCoverageMappingBuilder relies on the information to decide the
region for a attributed loop.
Fixes PR40971
Reviewers: ABataev, jdenny, lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman
Reviewed by: jdenny, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80944
test cases
Add support for #pragma float_control
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, sepavloff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841
This reverts commit 85dc033cac, and makes
corrections to the test cases that failed on buildbots.
in the token stream.
Previously we deleted all template-id annotations at the end of each
top-level declaration. That doesn't work: we can do some lookahead and
form a template-id annotation, and then roll back that lookahead, parse,
and decide that we're missing a semicolon at the end of a top-level
declaration, before we reach the annotation token. In that situation,
we'd end up parsing the annotation token after deleting its associated
data, leading to various forms of badness.
We now only delete template-id annotations if the preprocessor can
assure us that there are no annotation tokens left in the token stream
(or if we're already at EOF). This lets us delete the annotation tokens
earlier in a lot of cases; we now clean them up at the end of each
statement and class member, not just after each top-level declaration.
This also permitted some simplification of the delay-parsed templates
cleanup code.
This change added two new attributes, rounding mode and exception
behavior to the structure FPOptions. These attributes allow more
flexible treatment of specific floating point environment than it is
provided by #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65994
Summary:
this allow much better support of codebases like the linux kernel that mix tabs and spaces.
-ftabstop=//Width// allow specifying how large tabs are considered to be.
Reviewers: xbolva00, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mstorsjo, cfe-commits, jyknight, riccibruno, rsmith, nathanchance
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71037
This reverts commit b47b35ff51.
This caused failed asserts (Assertion `FIDAndOffset.second >
ColNo && "Column number smaller than file offset?"' failed.)
on a source file with a single line containing
"int main (void) { for( int i = 0; i < 9; i++ ); return 0; }".
Summary:
this allow much better support of codebases like the linux kernel that mix tabs and spaces.
-ftabstop=//Width// allow specifying how large tabs are considered to be.
Reviewers: xbolva00, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jyknight, riccibruno, rsmith, nathanchance
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71037
Summary:
We don't know what context to use until the classification result is
consumed by the parser, which could happen in a different semantic
context. So don't build the expression that results from name
classification until we get to that point and can handle it properly.
This covers everything except C++ implicit class member access, which
is a little awkward to handle properly in the face of the protected
member access check. But it at least fixes all the currently-filed
instances of PR43080.
Reviewers: efriedma
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68896
llvm-svn: 374826
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Ignore trailing NullStmts in compound expressions when determining the result type and value. This is to match the GCC behavior which ignores semicolons at the end of compound expressions.
Patch by Dominic Ferreira.
llvm-svn: 365498
The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076 added a new coroutine error that
prevented users from using 'co_await' or 'co_yield' within a exception
handler. However, it was reverted in https://reviews.llvm.org/rC356774
because it caused a regression in nested scopes in C++ catch statements,
as documented by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
The issue was due to an incorrect use of a `clang::ParseScope`. To fix:
1. Add a regression test for catch statement parsing that mimics the bug
report from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
2. Re-apply the coroutines error patch from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076, but this time with the correct
ParseScope behavior.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith, riccibruno, jbulow
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Subscribers: EricWF, jdoerfert, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59752
llvm-svn: 356865
expression is a discarded-value expression.
Summary:
We used to get this wrong in three ways:
1) During parsing, an expression-statement followed by the }) ending a
statement expression was always treated as producing the value of the
statement expression. That's wrong for ({ if (1) expr; })
2) During template instantiation, various kinds of statement (most
statements not appearing directly in a compound-statement) were not
treated as discarded-value expressions, resulting in missing volatile
loads (etc).
3) In all contexts, an expression-statement with attributes was not
treated as producing the value of the statement expression, eg
({ [[attr]] expr; }).
Also fix incorrect enforcement of OpenMP rule that directives can "only
be placed in the program at a position where ignoring or deleting the
directive would result in a program with correct syntax". In particular,
a label (be it goto, case, or default) should not affect whether
directives are permitted.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57984
llvm-svn: 354090
Preferred types are used by code completion for ranking. This commit
considerably increases the number of points in code where those types
are propagated.
In order to avoid complicating signatures of Parser's methods, a
preferred type is kept as a member variable in the parser and updated
during parsing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56723
llvm-svn: 352788
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.
This patch fixes PR39837.
llvm-svn: 350404
struct LoopHint was only used within Parse and not in any of the Sema or
Codegen files. In the non-Parse files where it was included, it either wasn't
used or LoopHintAttr was used, so its inclusion did nothing.
llvm-svn: 347728
Summary:
clang has `-Wextra-semi` (D43162), which is not dictated by the currently selected standard.
While that is great, there is at least one more source of need-less semis - 'null statements'.
Sometimes, they are needed:
```
for(int x = 0; continueToDoWork(x); x++)
; // Ugly code, but the semi is needed here.
```
But sometimes they are just there for no reason:
```
switch(X) {
case 0:
return -2345;
case 5:
return 0;
default:
return 42;
}; // <- oops
;;;;;;;;;;; <- OOOOPS, still not diagnosed. Clearly this is junk.
```
Additionally:
```
if(; // <- empty init-statement
true)
;
switch (; // empty init-statement
x) {
...
}
for (; // <- empty init-statement
int y : S())
;
}
As usual, things may or may not go sideways in the presence of macros.
While evaluating this diag on my codebase of interest, it was unsurprisingly
discovered that Google Test macros are *very* prone to this.
And it seems many issues are deep within the GTest itself, not
in the snippets passed from the codebase that uses GTest.
So after some thought, i decided not do issue a diagnostic if the semi
is within *any* macro, be it either from the normal header, or system header.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 | PR39111 ]]
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, efriedma
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52695
llvm-svn: 347339
We haven't supported compiling ObjC1 for a long time (and never will again), so
there isn't any reason to keep these separate. This patch replaces
LangOpts::ObjC1 and LangOpts::ObjC2 with LangOpts::ObjC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53547
llvm-svn: 345637
information is then discarded with a warning to the user that we don't
support it.
This patch gets us one step closer by getting the info down into the
AST in most cases.
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49865
llvm-svn: 339693
Timm Bäder