In this instance we are generating the tail-call during legalizeDAG. The 2nd
floor call can't be a tail call because it clobbers %xmm1, which is defined by
the first floor call. The first floor call can't be a tail-call because it's
not in the tail position. The only reasonable way I could think to fix this
in a target-independent manner was to check for glue logic on the copy reg.
rdar://10930395
llvm-svn: 151877
legalization time. Since at legalization time there is no mapping from
SDNode back to the corresponding LLVM instruction and the return
SDNode is target specific, this requires a target hook to check for
eligibility. Only x86 and ARM support this form of sibcall optimization
right now.
rdar://8707777
llvm-svn: 120501
Chad Rosier