For some reason `operator""s(const char8_t*, size_t)` was marked `noexcept`. Remove it and add regression tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, huixie90, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132340
Adding `[[nodiscard]]` to functions is a conforming extension and done extensively in the MSVC STL.
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, cjdb, mgrang, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128267
This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed, but avoid breaking developers using and
vendors shipping libc++.
The method used is to guard transitive includes based on the
C++ language version. For the upcoming C++23 we can remove
headers when we want, but for other language versions we try
to keep it to a minimum.
In this code the transitive include of `<chrono>` is removed
since D128577 introduces a header cycle between `<format>`
and `<chrono>`. This cycle is indirectly required by the
Standard. Our cycle dependency tool basically is a grep based
tool, so it needs some hints to ignore cycles. With the input
of our transitive include tests we can create a better tool.
However that's out of the scope of this patch.
Note the flag `_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` remains
unchanged. So users can still opt-out of transitives includes
entirely.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132284
Formatting the alternate form for the general categories should keep the
trailing zeros. This was reported by @fsb4000 in D131336.
The default format uses general formatting but this should not keep the
trailing zeros so the default format is not passed to the formatter.
While testing I found an off by one error; finding the exponent character
`e` in 1e+03 will start at after the `1` so a size of `4` can contain an
exponent.
Reviewed By: fsb4000, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131417
Move the concept to the concepts header and uses a name in the style of
P2286.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131176
Implements:
- LWG3721 Allow an arg-id with a value of zero for width in std-format-spec
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130649
While working on D132534 it appeared the experimental PMR code doesn't
have version guards and fails to compile on C++03. This adds the guards
for that version. It seems the tests already were only disabled for
C++03.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132582
This version is build without support for the experimental library but
the code still wants to link this function. Inlining the function solves
the issue.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132667
This patch simplifies the implementation of `deque` by removing the `__deque_base` class which results in a lot less indirections and removes the need for `__base::`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: AdvenamTacet, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132081
libc++ prior to LLVM 15 has a bug in it due to it excluding
`remove_reference_t` when `__remove_reference` is available as a
compiler built-in. This went unnoticed until D116203 because it wasn't
available in any compiler.
To work around this, we're renaming `__remove_reference` to
`__remove_reference_t`.
TEST=Tested locally, tested using emscripten
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0 allows disabling the exception parts of the MS STL
and vcruntime, and e.g. compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer sets this define (to
work around issues with MS STL). If using libc++ instead of MS STL,
this define previously broke the libc++ headers.
If _HAS_EXCEPTIONS is set to 0, the vcruntime_exception.h header
doesn't define the ABI base class std::exception. If no exceptions
are going to be thrown, this probably is fine (although it also
breaks using subclasses of it as regular objects that aren't thrown),
but it requires ifdeffing out all subclasses of all exception/error
derived objects (which are sprinkled throughout the headers).
Instead, libc++ will supply an ABI compatible definition when
_HAS_EXCEPTIONS is set to 0, which will make the class hierarchies
complete.
In this build configuration, one can still create instances of
exception subclasses, and those objects will be ABI incompatible
with the ones from when _HAS_EXCEPTIONS isn't defined to 0 - but
one may argue that's a pathological/self-imposed problem in that case.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103947
An issue I often see in codebases compiled for unusual platforms is
that header search paths are specified manually and are subtly wrong.
For example, people will manually add `-isystem <some-toolchain>/usr/include`,
which ends up messing up the layering of header search paths required by
libc++ (because the C Standard Library now appears *before* libc++ in
the search paths). Without this patch, this will end up causing
compilation errors that are pretty inscrutable. This patch aims to
improve the user experience by diagnosing this issue explicitly.
In all cases I can think of, I would expect that a compilation error
occur if these header search paths are not layered properly. This
should only provide an explicit diagnostic instead of failing due
to seemingly unrelated compilation errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131441
While working on D129964 I noticed some code hadn't been uglyfied, this
rectifies the issue.
Depends on D129964
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131834