Add the IR and the AsmPrinter parts for handling of the DW_OP_entry_values
DWARF operation.
([11/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60866
llvm-svn: 364542
Many LLVM-based tools already support response files (i.e. files
containing a list of options, specified with '@'). This change simply
updates the documentation and help text for some of these tools to
include it. I haven't attempted to fix all tools, just a selection that
I am interested in.
I've taken the opportunity to add some tests for --help behaviour, where
they were missing. We could expand these tests, but I don't think that's
within scope of this patch.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42233 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42236.
Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay, jkorous
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63597
llvm-svn: 364036
--help and -h are automatically supported by the command-line parser,
unless overridden by the tool. The behaviour of the PrintHelpMessage
being used for -h prior to this patch is subtly different to that
provided by --help automatically (it omits certain elements of help text
and options, such as --help-list), so overriding the default is not
desirable, without good reason. This patch removes the explicit
specification of -h and its behaviour, so that the default behaviour is
used.
Reviewed by: hintonda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63565
llvm-svn: 364029
The original line was there from when this test was added, but it is
checking for a switch that doesn't exist, so really has no purpose, at
least any more.
llvm-svn: 363833
-o is in the documentation, but not in the llvm-dwarfdump help text.
This patch adds it by inverting the -o and --out-file aliasing. It also
removes --out-file from the documentation, since we don't really want
people to be using this switch in practice.
Reviewed by: aprantl, JDevlieghere, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63013
llvm-svn: 363044
This adds `-parent-recurse-depth` which limits the number of parent DIEs
being dumped.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62359
llvm-svn: 361671
Add check for, and parsing of, .dwo files to Statistics.cpp; create a new getNon
SkeletonUnitDie function for DWARFUnit.h
Reviewers: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://review.llvm.org/D61755
llvm-svn: 360380
Summary:
Make DW_LNS_copy set the discriminator register to 0, to conform to
DWARF 4 & 5: "Then it sets the discriminator register to 0, and sets the
basic_block, prologue_end and epilogue_begin registers to false."
Because all of DW_LNE_end_sequence, DN_LNS_copy, and special opcodes reset
discriminator to 0, we can move discriminator=0 to appendRowToMatrix.
Also, make DW_LNS_copy print before appending the row, as it is similar
to a address+=0,line+=0 special opcode, which prints before appending
the row.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, aprantl
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: danielcdh, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60364
llvm-svn: 358148
The standard doesn't require a DW_TAG_variable, DW_TAG_formal_parameter
or DW_TAG_constant to A DW_AT_type attribute describing the type of the
variable. It only specifies that it *can* have one.
llvm-svn: 357628
When dumping ToT clan's debug info with dwarfdump, we were seeing an
error saying that that the location list overflows the debug_loc
section. After reducing the testcase we figured out that we were
interpreting the DW_FORM_data4 as a section offset.
In DWARF3 DW_FORM_data4 and DW_FORM_data8 served also as a section
offset. Until now we didn't check check for the DWARF version, because
some producers (read old versions of clang) were still emitting this.
The relevant code/comment was added in 2013, and I believe it's now
reasonable to start checking the version.
The FormValue class is a little bit of a mess because it cashes the
DWARF unit and context when it extracted the value itself. Several
methods of the class rely on it being present, or return an Optional for
the code path that needs it. At the same time the FormValue class also
used in places where there's no DWARF unit.
For this patch I went with the least invasive change: checking the
version from the CU when it's available. If it's not (because the form
value was created from a value directly) we default to the old behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58698
llvm-svn: 355456
Add statistics for abstract origins, function, variable and parameter
locations; break the 'variable' counts down into variables and
parameters. Also update call site counting to check for
DW_AT_call_{file,line} in addition to DW_TAG_call_site.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58849
llvm-svn: 355243
Adds llvm-dwarfdump support for pretty printing Dwarf5 expressions ops
that reference a base type (right now only DW_OP_convert is added).
Includes verification to verify that the ops operand is actually a
DW_TAG_base_type DIE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58442
llvm-svn: 354552
DW_TAG_subprogram DIEs should not be counted in the inlined function statistic. This also addresses the source variables count, as that uses the inlined function count in its calculations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57849
llvm-svn: 353491
The wrong variable was being used when printing the address increment in
verbose output of .debug_line. This patch fixes this.
Reviewed by: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57693
llvm-svn: 353288
This is to address post-commit feedback from Paul Robinson on r348954.
The original commit misinterprets count and upper bound as the same thing (I thought I saw GCC producing an upper bound the same as Clang's count, but GCC correctly produces an upper bound that's one less than the count (in C, that is, where arrays are zero indexed)).
I want to preserve the C-like output for the common case, so in the absence of a lower bound the count (or one greater than the upper bound) is rendered between []. In the trickier cases, where a lower bound is specified, a half-open range is used (eg: lower bound 1, count 2 would be "[1, 3)" and an unknown parts use a '?' (eg: "[1, ?)" or "[?, 7)" or "[?, ? + 3)").
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55721
llvm-svn: 349670
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39992,
If we have the following code (test.cpp):
thread_local int tdata = 24;
and build an .o file with debug information:
clang --target=x86_64-pc-linux -c bar.cpp -g
Then object produced may have R_X86_64_DTPOFF64/R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 relocations.
(clang emits R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 and gcc emits R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 for the code above for me)
Currently, llvm-dwarfdump fails to compute this TLS relocation when dumping
object and reports an
error:
failed to compute relocation: R_X86_64_DTPOFF64, Invalid data was encountered while parsing the file
This relocation represents the offset in the TLS block and resolved by the linker,
but this info is unavailable at the
point when the object file is dumped by this tool.
The patch adds the simple evaluation for such relocations to avoid emitting errors.
Resulting behavior seems to be equal to GNU dwarfdump.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55762
llvm-svn: 349476
Doesn't handle varargs and other fun things, but it's a start. (also
doesn't print these strictly as valid C++ when it's a pointer to
function, it'll print as "void(int)*" instead of "void (*)(int)")
llvm-svn: 348965
The test was fully rewritten for simplification.
New test code was suggested by David Blaikie.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55261
llvm-svn: 348464
When there is no .debug_addr section for some reason,
llvm-dwarfdump would print the bogus empty section name when dumping ranges
in .debug_info:
DW_AT_ranges [DW_FORM_rnglistx] (indexed (0x0) rangelist = 0x00000004
[0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000001) ""
[0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000002) "")
That happens because of the code which uses 0 (zero) as a section index as a default value.
The code should use -1ULL instead because technically 0 is a valid zero section index
in ELF and -1ULL is a special constant used that means "no section available".
This is mostly a fix for the overall correctness/safety of the code,
but a test case is provided too.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55113
llvm-svn: 348115
Adding functionality to the DWARF verifier for DWARF v5 strx* forms which
index into the string offsets table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54049
llvm-svn: 346061
Relocatable content may have overlapping ranges until the sections are
finalized. This reduces the amount of verification that is done on an object
file so that invalid errors are not raised.
llvm-svn: 345441
As was already mentioned in comments for D53364, DWARF 5
spec says about DW_LLE_startx_length:
"This is a form of bounded location description that has two unsigned ULEB operands.
The first value is an address index (into the .debug_addr section) that indicates the beginning of the address range
over which the location is valid. The second value is the length of the range. ")
Currently, the length is always parsed as U32.
Patch change the behavior to parse DW_LLE_startx_length as ULEB128 for DWARF 5
and keeps it as U32 for DWARF4+(pre-DWARF5) for compatibility.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53564
llvm-svn: 345254
Using -diff and -verbose together doesn't work today. We should audit
where these two options interact and fix them. In the meantime we error
out when the user try to specify both.
llvm-svn: 345084
DWARF v5 introduces DW_AT_call_all_calls, a subprogram attribute which
indicates that all calls (both regular and tail) within the subprogram
have call site entries. The information within these call site entries
can be used by a debugger to populate backtraces with synthetic tail
call frames.
Tail calling frames go missing in backtraces because the frame of the
caller is reused by the callee. Call site entries allow a debugger to
reconstruct a sequence of (tail) calls which led from one function to
another. This improves backtrace quality. There are limitations: tail
recursion isn't handled, variables within synthetic frames may not
survive to be inspected, etc. This approach is not novel, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=jelinek.pdf
This patch adds an IR-level flag (DIFlagAllCallsDescribed) which lowers
to DW_AT_call_all_calls. It adds the minimal amount of DWARF generation
support needed to emit standards-compliant call site entries. For easier
deployment, when the debugger tuning is LLDB, the DWARF requirement is
adjusted to v4.
Testing: Apart from check-{llvm, clang}, I built a stage2 RelWithDebInfo
clang binary. Its dSYM passed verification and grew by 1.4% compared to
the baseline. 151,879 call site entries were added.
rdar://42001377
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49887
llvm-svn: 343883
- Add fix so that all code paths that create DWARFContext
with an ObjectFile initialise the target architecture in the context
- Add an assert that the Arch is known in the Dwarf CallFrameString method
llvm-svn: 343317
Instead of indexing local variables by DIE offset, use the variable
name + the path through the lexical block tree. This makes the lookup
key consistent across duplicate abstract origins in different CUs.
llvm-svn: 342776
This extends the verifier to catch three new errors:
* Missing DW_AT_type attributes for DW_TAG_formal_parameter,
DW_TAG_variable and DW_TAG_array_type.
* Valid references for DW_AT_type pointing to a non-type tag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52223
llvm-svn: 342713
Verify that DW_AT_specification and DW_AT_abstract_origin reference a
DIE with a compatible tag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38719
llvm-svn: 342712
The -diff option makes it easy to diff dwarf by hiding addresses and
offsets. However not all of them were hidden, which should be fixed by
this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51593
llvm-svn: 341377
According to the standard, for the .debug_names (the "dwarf accelerator
tables"):
> If a subprogram or inlined subroutine is included, and has a
> DW_AT_linkage_name attribute, there will be an additional index entry
> for the linkage name.
For Swift we generate DW_structure_types with a linkage name and the
verifier was incorrectly rejecting this. This patch fixes that by only
considering the linkage name in those particular cases. The test is the
"reduced" debug info of the failing swift test on swift.org.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51420
llvm-svn: 341311
Djordje Todorovic