Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dorit Nuzman eac89d736c [LV/LoopAccess] Check statically if an unknown dependence distance can be
proven larger than the loop-count

This fixes PR31098: Try to resolve statically data-dependences whose
compile-time-unknown distance can be proven larger than the loop-count, 
instead of resorting to runtime dependence checking (which are not always 
possible).

For vectorization it is sufficient to prove that the dependence distance 
is >= VF; But in some cases we can prune unknown dependence distances early,
and even before selecting the VF, and without a runtime test, by comparing 
the distance against the loop iteration count. Since the vectorized code 
will be executed only if LoopCount >= VF, proving distance >= LoopCount 
also guarantees that distance >= VF. This check is also equivalent to the 
Strong SIV Test.

Reviewers: mkuper, anemet, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28044

llvm-svn: 294892
2017-02-12 09:32:53 +00:00
Sean Silva 284b0324e2 [PM] Avoid getResult on a higher level in LoopAccessAnalysis
Note that require<domtree> and require<loops> aren't needed because they
come in implicitly via the loop pass manager.

llvm-svn: 274712
2016-07-07 01:01:53 +00:00
Xinliang David Li 8a021317a2 [PM] Port LoopAccessInfo analysis to new PM
It is implemented as a LoopAnalysis pass as 
discussed and agreed upon.

llvm-svn: 274452
2016-07-02 21:18:40 +00:00
Andrey Turetskiy 9f02c58670 [LAA] Improve non-wrapping pointer detection by handling loop-invariant case.
This fixes PR26314. This patch adds new helper “isNoWrap” with detection of
loop-invariant pointer case.

Patch by Roman Shirokiy.

Ref: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26314

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17268

llvm-svn: 272014
2016-06-07 14:55:27 +00:00