The fold (D63391) uses multiplicativeInverse(),
but it is not guaranteed to always succeed,
and '100' appears to be one of the problematic values.
llvm-svn: 364578
Update the doc after llvm-svn: 364121 is landed.
With two more trivial fixes that are not related to
--disassemble-functions but still about llvm-objdump.
Reviewers: jhenderson, grimar, MaskRay, rupprecht, peter.smith
Reviewed by: jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63787
llvm-svn: 364573
Summary:
- Match the syntax output by InstPrinter.
- Fix it always emitting 0 for align. Had to work around fact that
opcode is not available for GetDefaultP2Align while parsing.
- Updated tests that were erroneously happy with a p2align=0
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits, dschuff
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63633
llvm-svn: 364570
We already had the infrastructure for this, but were waiting for the fix for a number of regressions which were handled by the recent shuffle(extract_subvector(),extract_subvector()) -> extract_subvector(shuffle()) shuffle combines
llvm-svn: 364569
Summary:
The new test case led to incorrect code.
Change-Id: Ief48b227e97aa662dd3535c9bafb27d4a184efca
Reviewers: arsenm, david-salinas
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63871
llvm-svn: 364566
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
Original patch author: @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)!
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364563
This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack
that includes the current invocation.
This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless
loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801
llvm-svn: 364555
Emit replacements for clobbered parameters location if the parameter
has unmodified value throughout the funciton. This is basic scenario
where we can use the debug entry values.
([12/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58042
llvm-svn: 364553
The "See Also" section for llvm-nm didn't actually contain any links,
and the tools referred to didn't make much sense (referring to non-LLVM
tools, when we have equivalents, or tools that aren't really to do with
symbol dumping). llvm-objdump's didn't refer to llvm-readelf.
Reviewed by: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63875
llvm-svn: 364552
There is existing bitcode that we need to support where the structured nature
of pointer types is used to derive the result type of some operation. For
example a GEP's operation and result will be based on its input Type.
When pointers become opaque, the BitcodeReader will still have access to this
information because it's explicitly told how to construct the more complex
types used, but this information will not be attached to any Value that gets
looked up. This changes BitcodeReader so that in all places which use type
information in this manner, it's derived from a side-table rather than from the
Value in question.
llvm-svn: 364550
This was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41751
llvm-mc aborted when disassembling tabortdc.
This patch try to clean up TM related DAGs.
* Fixes the problem by remove explicit output of cr0, and put it as implicit def.
* Update int_ppc_tbegin pattern to accommodate the implicit def of cr0.
* Update the TCHECK operand and int_ppc_tcheck accordingly.
* Add some builtin test and disassembly tests.
* Remove unused CRRC0/crrc0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61935
llvm-svn: 364544
We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see
crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210.
> Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
> - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
> the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
> overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
> - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
> different since they only report the array or
> struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
> rather than all aggregates which contain one in
> a nested member.
> - Corrected an older comment
>
> Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen
>
> Reviewed By: sdesmalen
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321
llvm-svn: 364543
Add the IR and the AsmPrinter parts for handling of the DW_OP_entry_values
DWARF operation.
([11/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60866
llvm-svn: 364542
Sphinx allows for definitions of command-line options using
`.. option <name>` and references to those options via `:option:<name>`.
However, it looks like there is no scoping of these options by default,
meaning that links can end up pointing to incorrect documents. See for
example the llvm-mca document, which contains references to -o that,
prior to this patch, pointed to a different document. What's worse is
that these links appear to be non-deterministic in which one is picked
(on my machine, some references end up pointing to opt, whereas on the
live docs, they point to llvm-dwarfdump, for example).
The fix is to add the .. program <name> tag. This essentially namespaces
the options (definitions and references) to the named program, ensuring
that the links are kept correct.
Reviwed by: andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63873
llvm-svn: 364538
Handle call instruction replacements and deletions in order to preserve
valid state of the call site info of the MachineFunction.
NOTE: If the call site info is enabled for a new target, the assertion from
the MachineFunction::DeleteMachineInstr() should help to locate places
where the updateCallSiteInfo() should be called in order to preserve valid
state of the call site info.
([10/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61062
llvm-svn: 364536
The code to generate register move instructions in and out of VPR and
FPSCR_NZCV had assertions checking that the other register involved
was a GPR _pair_, instead of a single GPR as it should have been.
Reviewers: miyuki, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63865
llvm-svn: 364534
The BF and WLS/WLSTP instructions have various branch-offset fields
occupying different positions and lengths in the instruction encoding,
and all of them were decoded at disassembly time by the function
DecodeBFLabelOffset() which returned SoftFail if the offset was zero.
In fact, it's perfectly fine and not even a SoftFail for most of those
offset fields to be zero. The only one that can't be zero is the 4-bit
field labelled `boff` in the architecture spec, occupying bits {26-23}
of the BF instruction family. If that one is zero, the encoding
overlaps other instructions (WLS, DLS, LETP, VCTP), so it ought to be
a full Fail.
Fixed by adding an extra template parameter to DecodeBFLabelOffset
which controls whether a zero offset is accepted or rejected. Adjusted
existing tests (only in error messages for bad disassemblies); added
extra tests to demonstrate zero offsets being accepted in all the
right places, and a few demonstrating rejection of zero `boff`.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63864
llvm-svn: 364533
Different versions of the Arm architecture disallow the use of generic
coprocessor instructions like MCR and CDP on different sets of
coprocessors. This commit centralises the check of the coprocessor
number so that it's consistent between assembly and disassembly, and
also updates it for the new restrictions in Arm v8.1-M.
New tests added that check all the coprocessor numbers; old tests
updated, where they used a number that's now become illegal in the
context in question.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863
llvm-svn: 364532
In the `CSEL Rd,Rm,Rn` instruction family (also including CSINC, CSINV
and CSNEG), the architecture lists it as CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE
(i.e. SoftFail) to use SP in the Rd or Rm slot, but outright illegal
to use it in the Rn slot, not least because some encodings of that
form are used by MVE instructions such as UQRSHLL.
MC was treating all three slots the same, as SoftFail. So the only
reason UQRSHLL was disassembled correctly at all was because the MVE
decode table is separate from the Thumb2 one and takes priority; if
you turned off MVE, then encodings such as `[0x5f,0xea,0x0d,0x83]`
would disassemble as spurious CSELs.
Fixed by inventing another version of the `GPRwithZR` register class,
which disallows SP completely instead of just SoftFailing it.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63862
llvm-svn: 364531
FunctionComparator attempts to produce a stable comparison of two Function
instances by looking at all available properties. Since ByVal attributes now
contain a Type pointer, they are not trivially ordered and FunctionComparator
should use its own Type comparison logic to sort them.
llvm-svn: 364523
Object/invalid.test is a test case that is used to check the behavior of tools
when broken inputs are used.
The most often tool tested there is llvm-readobj. I think we might want to move
such tests to test\tools\llvm-readobj. For now this patch converts
many sub-tests to use YAML and removes 12 binaries from the inputs.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63762
llvm-svn: 364522
This allows setting different values for e_shentsize, e_shoff, e_shnum
and e_shstrndx fields and is useful for producing broken inputs for various
test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63771
llvm-svn: 364517
While lowering calls, collect info about registers that forward arguments
into following function frame. We store such info into the MachineFunction
of the call. This is used very late when dumping DWARF info about
call site parameters.
([9/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60715
llvm-svn: 364516
Once MIR code leaves SSA form and the liveness of a vreg is considered,
DBG_VALUE insts are able to refer to non-live vregs, because their
debug-uses do not contribute to liveness. This non-liveness becomes
problematic for optimizations like register coalescing, as they can't
``see'' the debug uses in the liveness analyses.
As a result registers get coalesced regardless of debug uses, and that can
lead to invalid variable locations containing unexpected values. In the
added test case, the first vreg operand of ADD32rr is merged with various
copies of the vreg (great for performance), but a DBG_VALUE of the
unmodified operand is blindly updated to the modified operand. This changes
what value the variable will appear to have in a debugger.
Fix this by changing any DBG_VALUE whose operand will be resurrected by
register coalescing to be a $noreg DBG_VALUE, i.e. give the variable no
location. This is an overapproximation as some coalesced locations are
safe (others are not) -- an extra domination analysis would be required to
work out which, and it would be better if we just don't generate non-live
DBG_VALUEs.
This fixes PR40010.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56151
llvm-svn: 364515
Remove the last use of packRegs from IRTranslator and delete
pack/unpackRegs. This introduces a fallback to DAGISel for intrinsics
with aggregate arguments, since we don't have a testcase for them so
it's hard to tell how we'd want to handle them.
Discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63551
llvm-svn: 364514
Roman Lebedev