Summary:
This patch aims to fix the bug reported at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33189. Clang hits an assertion
when a template destructor declaration is present. This is caused by
later processing that does not expect to encounter a template when
looking at a destructor. The resolution is to treat the destructor as
being not declared when later processing is interested in the properties
of the destructor of a class.
Reviewers: rcraik, hubert.reinterpretcast, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33833
Patch by Kuang He!
llvm-svn: 306905
It was reverted in r305460 but the issue appears to only break our self-host
libcxx modules bot. Reapplying it will give us a chance to get a reproducer and
fix the issue.
llvm-svn: 306903
Summary:
The lit test formats use largely the same logic for discovering tests. There are
some superficial differences in the logic, which seem reasonable enough to
handle in a single routine.
At a high level, the common goal is "look for files that end with one of these
suffixes, and skip anything starting with a dot." The balance of the logic
specific to ShTest and GoogleTest collapses quite a bit, so that
getTestsInDirectory is only a couple of lines around a call to the new function.
Reviewers: zturner, MatzeB, modocache
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34855
llvm-svn: 306895
Summary: This patch teaches IteratedDominanceFrontier to use the level information stored in DomTreeNodes instead of calculating it manually.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34703
llvm-svn: 306894
Summary:
This patch adds another verification function for checking correctness of findNearestCommonDominator.
For every edge from U to V in the input graph, `NCD(U, V) == IDom(V) or V` -- the new function checks this condition.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34575
llvm-svn: 306893
Summary:
This patch makes DomTreeNodes keep their level (depth) in the DomTree. By having this information always available, it is possible to speedup and simplify findNearestCommonDominator and certain dominance queries.
In the future, level information will be also needed to perform incremental updates.
My testing doesn't show any noticeable performance differences after applying this patch. There may be some improvements when other passes are thought to use the level information.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc, grosser
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34548
llvm-svn: 306892
Type records have a unique type index, but symbol records do
not. Instead, symbol records refer to other symbol records
by referencing their offset in the symbol stream. In a sense
this is the analogue of the TypeIndex, but we are not printing
it in the dumper. Printing it not only gives us more useful
information when manually investigating the contents of a PDB,
but also allows us to write better tests by enabling us to
verify that fields that reference other symbol records do
so correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34906
llvm-svn: 306890
If the instructions at the beginning of the block have no location,
we're better off using the location of the first instruction in the
current basic block. At the very least, that instruction post-dominates
this one, whereas if we don't emit a .cv_loc directive, we end up using
the potentially invalid location that falls through from the previous
block.
We could probably do better here by emitting some kind of ".cv_loc end"
directive that stops the line table entry of the previous .cv_loc
directive from bleeding out of its basic block. This would improve the
line table when an entire MBB has no valid location info.
llvm-svn: 306889
We aren't looking through any levels of IR here so I don't think we need the power of a matcher or the temporary variable it requires.
llvm-svn: 306885
Check if a single cast is preventing handling a first-order-recurrence Phi,
because the scheduling constraints it imposes on the first-order-recurrence
shuffle are infeasible; but they can be made feasible by moving the cast
downwards. Record such casts and move them when vectorizing the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33058
llvm-svn: 306884
The root cause of the issues reported in D32406 and D34680 is that clang
instruments functions without bodies. Make it stop doing that, and also
teach it how to use old (incorrectly generated) profiles without
crashing.
llvm-svn: 306883
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding LLVM change is r306878.
llvm-svn: 306881
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding LLVM change is r306878.
llvm-svn: 306880
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding LLVM change is r306878.
llvm-svn: 306879
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding updates to clang, clang-tools-extra, and lld to follow.
llvm-svn: 306878
The llvm flag "-hexagon-emit-lookup-tables" guards the generation
of lookup table generated from a switch statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34819
llvm-svn: 306877
This adds all remaining instructions that were still missing, mostly
privileged and semi-privileged system-level instructions. These are
provided for use with the assembler and disassembler only.
This brings the LLVM assembler / disassembler to parity with the
GNU binutils tools.
llvm-svn: 306876
It looks like there are two target-independent but not GISel instructions that
need legalization, IMPLICIT_DEF and PHI. These are already anomalies since
their operands have important LLTs attached, so to make things more uniform it
seems like a good idea to add generic variants. Starting with G_IMPLICIT_DEF.
llvm-svn: 306875
Summary:
This patch introduces a few extra BraceWrapping options, similar to
`SplitEmptyFunction`, to allow merging empty 'record' bodies (e.g.
class, struct, union and namespace):
* SplitEmptyClass
* SplitEmptyStruct
* SplitEmptyUnion
* SplitEmptyNamespace
The `SplitEmptyFunction` option name has also been simplified/
shortened (from `SplitEmptyFunctionBody`).
These options are helpful when the correspond AfterXXX option is
enabled, to allow merging the empty record:
class Foo
{};
In addition, this fixes an unexpected merging of short records, when
the AfterXXXX options are used, which caused to be formatted like
this:
class Foo
{ void Foo(); };
This is now properly formatted as:
class Foo
{
void Foo();
};
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34395
llvm-svn: 306874
This patch adds a new LLVM flag -hexagon-emit-jt-text which is defaulted to
"false". The value "true" emits the switch generated jump tables in text section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34820
llvm-svn: 306872
The llvm flag "-hexagon-emit-lookup-tables" guards the generation
of lookup table from a switch statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34819
llvm-svn: 306869
Summary:
This patch tries to avoid binpacking when initializing lists/arrays, to allow things like:
static int types[] = {
registerType1(),
registerType2(),
registerType3(),
};
std::map<int, std::string> x = {
{ 0, "foo fjakfjaklf kljj" },
{ 1, "bar fjakfjaklf kljj" },
{ 2, "stuff fjakfjaklf kljj" },
};
This is similar to how dictionnaries are formatted, and actually corresponds to the same conditions: when initializing a container (and not just 'calling' a constructor).
Such formatting involves 2 things:
* Line breaks around the content of the block. This can be forced by adding a comma or comment after the last element
* Elements should not be binpacked
This patch considers the block is an initializer list if it either ends with a comma, or follows an assignment, which seems to provide a sensible approximation.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34238
llvm-svn: 306868
This patch appends the name of the function to the switch generated lookup
table. This will ease the visual debugging in identifying the function the table
is generated from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34817
llvm-svn: 306867
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34865.
With the Clang uses of the old spelling having been removed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34865, get rid of the old "diagnostic hotness"
spellings in favor of the new "diagnostics hotness".
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34866
llvm-svn: 306866
On big-endian machines the high and low parts of the value accessed by ldrexd
and strexd are swapped around. To account for this we swap inputs and outputs
in ISelLowering.
Patch by Bharathi Seshadri.
llvm-svn: 306865
Summary:
Introduce a "hybrid" `-polly-target` option to optimise code for either the GPU or CPU.
When this target is selected, PPCGCodeGeneration will attempt first to optimise a Scop. If the Scop isn't modified, it is then sent to the passes that form the CPU pipeline, i.e. IslScheduleOptimizerPass, IslAstInfoWrapperPass and CodeGeneration.
In case the Scop is modified, it is marked to be skipped by the subsequent CPU optimisation passes.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur, bollu
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: kbarton, nemanjai, pollydev
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34054
llvm-svn: 306863
The existing check lines were more flexible, but these are
small enough tests that there shouldn't be much question
about register allocation. I've been hand-modifying this
file as I change the CGP memcmp expansion, but that's
more error-prone and time-consuming than just running the
update script.
llvm-svn: 306861
This reverts commit r306310.
r306310 causes clang to reject a call to an aligned allocation or
deallocation function if it is not implemented in the standard library
of the deployment target. This is not the desired behavior when users
have defined their own aligned functions.
rdar://problem/32664169
llvm-svn: 306859
Working with git on a branch I find it really annoying that committing
a change causes ninja to think that stuff needs to be rebuilt.
With this change at least nothing in llvm needs to be rebuild when
something is committed.
llvm-svn: 306858
Introduced in -r283004, the PassNameParser sorts Optimization options in
reverse. This is because the commit replaced a compare function with "<"
(which would seemingly be proper based on the name of the comparison function).
The result is the 'true' result is converted to '1', which is inverted.
This patch fixes this by replacing the '<' operator call on StringRef with a
call to the StringRef compare function. It also renames the function to better
reflect its meaning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34831
llvm-svn: 306857
Summary:
There have been bugs with the WindowsResource library, such as incorrect
symbols for addresses. Directly checking the .rsrc in the final PE will
help ensure this doesn't happen again.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34900
llvm-svn: 306854
Symbols in the resource COFF file should be for .rsrc$02, where the
actual resource data is, not .rsrc$01, which contains the directory
tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34832
Patch by Joe Ranieri.
llvm-svn: 306853
Previously we had the -type-index option which would dump the record of
a single, but we had no way to follow the dependency graph backwards and
also dump all dependent types.
Having this option makes test-writing better, because we can limit the
test to only those records that are of importance for the thing we're
trying to test, which allows us to use things like CHECK-NEXT to reduce
fragility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34899
llvm-svn: 306852
This is prep work to add MOVBE to all Atom CPUs. This instruction didn't come in to the Nehalem/Westmere/SandyBridge/etc. line until later so there's no natural place to overlap the Atom CPUs into that part of the switch.
llvm-svn: 306849
Summary:
To enable profile hotness information in diagnostics output, Clang takes
the option `-fdiagnostics-show-hotness` -- that's "diagnostics", with an
"s" at the end. Clang also defines `CodeGenOptions::DiagnosticsWithHotness`.
LLVM, on the other hand, defines
`LLVMContext::getDiagnosticHotnessRequested` -- that's "diagnostic", not
"diagnostics". It's a small difference, but it's confusing, typo-inducing, and
frustrating.
Add a new method with the spelling "diagnostics", and "deprecate" the
old spelling.
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34864
llvm-svn: 306848