Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Arsenault 79f67cae91 AMDGPU: Rename add/sub with carry out instructions
The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.

The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.

This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
2020-07-16 13:16:30 -04:00
Christudasan Devadasan 7c4e711ef8 [AMDGPU] Enable base pointer.
When the callee requires a dynamic stack realignment,
it is not possible to correcty access the incoming
stack arguments using the stack pointer. We reserve a
base pointer in such cases to access the function arguments
inside the callee. The base pointer will hold the incoming
stack pointer value before any kind of delta added to it.

Reviewed By: arsenm, scott.linder

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78811
2020-05-17 16:13:55 +05:30
Austin Kerbow 2cbb8c946a [AMDGPU] Reuse register during frame index elimination
If there were no free VGPRs we would need two emergency spill slots for register
scavenging during PEI/frame index elimination. Reuse 'ResultReg' for scale
calculation so that only one spill is needed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76387
2020-03-20 00:19:15 -07:00
Scott Linder 0e9368cc8c [AMDGPU] Move frame pointer from s34 to s33
Remove the gap left between the stack pointer (s32) and frame pointer
(s34) now that the scratch wave offset is no longer a part of the
calling convention ABI.

Update llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst to reflect the change.

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75657
2020-03-19 15:35:16 -04:00
Scott Linder 60b1967c39 [AMDGPU] Add Scratch Wave Offset to Scratch Buffer Descriptor in entry functions
Add the scratch wave offset to the scratch buffer descriptor (SRSrc) in
the entry function prologue. This allows us to removes the scratch wave
offset register from the calling convention ABI.

As part of this change, allow the use of an inline constant zero for the
SOffset of MUBUF instructions accessing the stack in entry functions
when a frame pointer is not requested/required. Entry functions with
calls still need to set up the calling convention ABI stack pointer
register, and reference it in order to address arguments of called
functions. The ABI stack pointer register remains unswizzled, but is now
wave-relative instead of queue-relative.

Non-entry functions also use an inline constant zero SOffset for
wave-relative scratch access, but continue to use the stack and frame
pointers as before. When the stack or frame pointer is converted to a
swizzled offset it is now scaled directly, as the scratch wave offset no
longer needs to be subtracted first.

Update llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst to reflect these changes to the calling
convention.

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75138
2020-03-19 15:35:16 -04:00
Austin Kerbow 256ad954a9 AMDGPU: Reuse carry out register during FI elimination
Summary:
Pre gfx9 we need to scavenge a 64-bit SGPR to use as the carry out for an Add.
If only one SGPR was available this crashed when trying to scavenge another
32bit SGPR to materialize the offset.

Instead, reuse a 32-bit SGPR from the carry out as the offset register.

Also prefer to use vcc for the unused carry out when it is available.

Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70614
2019-11-28 10:13:48 -08:00
Matt Arsenault 84489b34f6 AMDGPU: Handle frame index expansion with no free SGPRs pre gfx9
Since an add instruction must produce an unused carry out, this
requires additional SGPRs. This can be avoided by keeping the entire
offset computation in SGPRs. If one SGPR is still available, this only
costs one extra mov. If none are available, the entire computation can
be done in place and reversed.

This does assume the use is a VGPR operand. This was already assumed,
and we currently only select frame indexes to VALU instructions. This
should probably be fixed at some point to handle more possible MIR.

llvm-svn: 370929
2019-09-04 17:12:57 +00:00