Track source location information when available for actual arguments
to procedure references, and use this information when checking constraints
on calls so that error messages refer to specific actual arguments
rather than to the entire call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119849
Calls to C_F_POINTER() without the optional SHAPE= third argument
were failing to be recognized as proper calls to the intrinsic,
but the failure was not generating any error message. This led to
a crash in lowering, which rightfully expects a typed expression
to be associated with the call.
So (1) catch silent failures to convert CALL statements as internal
errors, as is done for expressions and assignment statements; and
(2) clean up C_F_POINTER intrinsic handling to cope with only two
arguments and to emit an error for a FPTR= argument with no type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119847
EQUIVALENCE storage association of objects whose types are not
both default-kind numeric storage sequences, or not both default-kind
character storage sequences, are not standard conformant.
However, most Fortran compilers admit such usage, with warnings
in strict conformance mode. This patch allos EQUIVALENCE of objects
that have sequence types that are either identical, both numeric
sequences (of default kind or not), or both character sequences.
Non-sequence types, and sequences types that are not homogeneously
numeric or character, remain errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119848
When a pointer assignment with bounds remapping has a function
reference as its right-hand side, don't check for array conformance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119845
Semantic analysis was emitting a bogus error message when a structure
constructor contains a monomorphic value for a (limited) polymorphic
component of a derived type. The type compatibility test was too
strict; this patch relaxes it a little to allow values that could
be assigned or passed to a variable or dummy argument with that type.
Also add some quotes to an error message that was sometimes confusing
without them, and remove a repeated space character from another.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119744
The predicate IsInitialDataTarget() was failing to return a correct true
result in the case of a reference to the intrinsic function NULL() with a
MOLD= argument. Fix, and improve tests for "NULL()" elsewhere in semantics,
checking for an attribute set by intrinsics.cpp rather than the actual name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119452
While one cannot of course statically initialize an allocatable component
of an instance of a derived type, its mere presence should not prevent
DATA initialization of the other nonallocatable components. Semantics
was treating the existence of an allocatable component as a case of
"default initialization", which it is, but not one that should run
afoul of C877. Add another Boolean argument to IsInitialized() to allow
for a more nuanced test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119449
Currently, code generation was creating weak symbols for derived type
descriptor global it could not find in the current compilation unit.
The rational is that:
- the derived type descriptors of external module derived types are
generated in the compilation unit that compiled the module so that
the type descriptor address is uniquely associated with the type.
- some types do not have derived type descriptors: the builtin derived
types used to create derived type descriptors. The runtime knows
about them and does not need them to accomplish the feat of
describing themselves. Hence, all unresolved derived type descriptors
in codegen cannot be assumed to be resolved at link time.
However, this caused immense debugging pain when, for some reasons, derived
type descriptor that should be generated were not. This caused random
runtime failures instead of a much cleaner link time failure.
Improve this situation by allowing codegen to detect the builtin derived
types that have no derived type descriptors and requiring the other
unresolved derived type descriptor to be resolved at link time.
Also make derived type descriptor constant data since this was a TODO
and makes the situation even cleaner. This requiring telling lowering
which compiler created symbols can be placed in read only memory. I
considered using PARAMETER, but I have mixed feeling using it since that
would cause the initializer expressions of derived type descriptor to
be invalid from a Fortran point of view since pointer targets cannot be
parameters. I do not want to start misusing Fortran attributes, even if
I think it is quite unlikely semantics would currently complain. I also
do not want to rely on the fact that all object symbols with the
CompilerCreated flags are currently constant data. This could easily
change in the future and cause runtime bugs if lowering rely on this
while the assumption is not loud and clear in semantics.
Instead, add a ReadOnly symbol flag to tell lowering that a compiler
generated symbol can be placed in read only memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119555
Device clause when it occurs with **target enter data** and **target exit data** must be declared with some non negative value. So some changes were made to evaluate the device clause argument to non negative value and throw the expected error when it takes negative value as argument.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119141
It is generally an error when a USE-associated name clashes
with a name defined locally, but not in all cases; a generic
interface can be both USE-associated and locally defined.
This works, but not when there is also a local subprogram
with the same name, which is valid when that subprogram is
a specific of the local generic. A bogus error issues at
the point of the USE because name resolution will have already
defined a symbol for the local subprogram.
The solution is to collect the names of local generics when
creating the program tree, and then create their symbols as
well if their names are also local subprograms, prior to any
USE association processing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119566
When a scope's symbol has characteriztics whose specification
expressions depend on other non-constant symbols in the same scope,
f18 rightfully emits an error. However, in the case of usage in
specification expressions involving host association, the program is not
invalid. This can arise, for example, in the case of an internal
function whose result's attributes use host-associated variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119565
Fortran allows forward references to derived types, including
function results that are typed in a prefix of a FUNCTION statement.
If a type is defined in the body of the function, a reference to
that type from a prefix on the FUNCTION statement must resolve to
the local symbol, even and especially when that type shadows one
from the host scope.
The solution is to defer the processing of that type until the
end of the function's specification part. But the language doesn't
allow for forward references to other names in the prefix, so defer
the processing of the type only when it is not an intrinsic type.
The data structures in name resolution that track this information
for functions needed to become a stack in order to make this work,
since functions can contain interfaces that are functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119448
Previously, when calling a procedure implicitly for which a global scope
procedure symbol with the same name existed, semantics resolved the
procedure name in the call to the global symbol without checking that
the symbol interface was compatible with the implicit interface of the
call.
This could cause expression rewrite and lowering to later badly process
the implicit call assuming a different result type or an explicit
interface. This could lead to lowering crash in case the actual argument
were incompatible with the dummies from the explicit interface.
Emit errors in the following problematic cases:
- If the result type from the symbol did not match the one from the
implicit interface.
- If the symbol requires an explicit interface.
This patch still allows calling an F77 like procedure with different
actual argument types than the one it was defined with because it is
correctly supported in lowering and is a feature in some program
(it is a pointer cast). The two cases that won't be accepted have
little chance to make much sense. Results returning ABIs may differ
depending on the return types, and function that requires explicit
interface usually requires descriptors or specific processing that
is incompatible with implicit interfaces.
Note that this patch is not making a deep analysis, and it will only
catch mistakes if a global symbol and an implicit interface are
involved. Cases where the user provided a conflicting explicit
interface would still require a pass after name resolution to study
conflicts more deeply. But these cases will not crash lowering or
trigger expression rewrite to do weird things.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119274
When a scope uses an explicit IMPORT statement to import a
symbol from the scope's host, it should not emit a bogus error
message later if that symbol is used in a specification construct.
The code that checks for imports being hidden by local declarations
was not allowing for the presence of host association (or USE)
indirection symbols in the local scope. Fix by using GetUltimate()
before checking for the hidden symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118747
When constructing the representation for a component reference
to an inherited component, expression semantics make the parent
component references explicit in the DataRef; e.g., base%component
becomes base%parent%grandparent%component if component was
inheritance-associated through two levels. But expression semantics
was inserting references to the symbol table entries for the
intermediate types, not the symbols for the parent components in
the extended types. (We didn't notice the distinction until
recently because both symbols have the same name; this only
affects lowering.) Find and use the right symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118746
For "USE, INTRINSIC", search only for intrinsic modules;
for "USE, NON_INTRINSIC", do not recognize intrinsic modules.
Allow modules of both kinds with the same name to be used in
the same source file (but not in the same scoping unit, a
constraint of the standard that is now enforced).
The symbol table's scope tree now has a single instance of
a scope with a new kind, IntrinsicModules, whose children are
the USE'd intrinsic modules (explicit or not). This separate
"top-level" scope is a child of the single global scope and
it allows both intrinsic and non-intrinsic modules of the same
name to exist in the symbol table. Intrinsic modules' scopes'
symbols now have the INTRINSIC attribute set.
The search path directories need to make a distinction between
regular directories and the one(s) that point(s) to intrinsic
modules. I allow for multiple intrinsic module directories in
the second search path, although only one is needed today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118631
User-defined derived type I/O implementation subroutines and
generic interfaces may be USE-associated, but the code that builds
the type description table wasn't allowing for that possibility.
Add a call to GetUltimate() to cope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117902
Consistent with previously documented policy, in which
BOZ literals are accepted in non-standard-conforming circumstances
where they can be converted to an unambiguous known numeric type,
allow BOZ literals to be passed as an actual argument in a reference
to a procedure whose explicit interface has a corresponding dummy
argument with a numeric type to which the BOZ literal may be
converted. Improve error messages associated with BOZ literal
actual arguments, too: don't emit multiple errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117698
When variable with the SAVE attribute appears in a pure subprogram,
emit a more specialized error message if the SAVE attribute was acquired
from static initialization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117699
Subclause 7.5.2.4 lists conditions under which two distinct derived
types are to be considered the same type for purposes of argument
association, assignment, and so on. These conditions are implemented
in evaluate::IsTkCompatibleWith(), but assignment semantics doesn't
use it for testing for intrinsic assignment compatibility. Fix that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117621
When a scalar-valued function with no distinct RESULT
is being called recursively in its own executable part,
emit a better message about the error. Clean up the
code that resolves function vs. array ambiguities in
expression semantics.
Update to address review comment
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117577
ENTRY statement names in module subprograms were not acceptable for
use as a "module procedure" in a generic interface, but should be.
ENTRY statements need to have symbols with place-holding
SubprogramNameDetails created for them in order to be visible in
generic interfaces. Those symbols are created from the "program
tree" data structure. This patch adds ENTRY statement names to the
program tree data structure and uses them to generate SubprogramNameDetails
symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117345
Very old (pre-'77 standard) codes would use arrays initialized
with Hollerith literals, typically in DATA, as modifiable
formats.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117344
Derived types with SEQUENCE must have data components of sequence
types; but this rule is relaxed as common an extension in the case of
pointer components, whose targets' types are not really relevant
to the implementation requirements of sequence types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117158
It's not conforming to specify the SAVE attribute more than
once for a variable, but it also doesn't hurt anything and
isn't fatal in other Fortran compilers. Downgrade the
message to a warning for better portability.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117153
This is nonconformant usage, but widely accepted as an extension.
Downgrade the error message to a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117152
We already accept assignments of INTEGER to LOGICAL (& vice versa)
as an extension, but not initialization. Extend initialization
to cover those cases.
(Also fix misspelling in nearby comment as suggested by code reviewer.)
Decouple an inadvertent dependence cycle by moving two
one-line function definitions into a header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117159
Implements part of the legacy "DEC structures" feature from
VMS Fortran. STRUCTUREs are processed as if they were derived
types with SEQUENCE. DATA-like object entity initialization
is supported as well (e.g., INTEGER FOO/666/) since it was used
for default component initialization in structures. Anonymous
components (named %FILL) are also supported.
These features, and UNION/MAP, were already being parsed.
An omission in the collection of structure field names in the
case of nested structures with entity declarations was fixed
in the parser.
Structures are supported in modules, but this is mostly for
testing purposes. The names of fields in structures accessed
via USE association cannot appear with dot notation in client
code (at least not yet). DEC structures antedate Fortran 90,
so their actual use in applications should not involve modules.
This patch does not implement UNION/MAP, since that feature
would impose difficulties later in lowering them to MLIR types.
In the meantime, if they appear, semantics will issue a
"not yet implemented" error message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117151
A bogus error message is appearing for structure constructors containing
values that correspond to unlimited polymorphic allocatable components.
A value of any type can actually be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117154
This supports the following checks for THREADPRIVATE Directive:
```
[5.1] 2.21.2 THREADPRIVATE Directive
A threadprivate variable must not appear in any clause except the
copyin, copyprivate, schedule, num_threads, thread_limit, and if clauses.
```
This supports the following checks for DECLARE TARGET Directive:
```
[5.1] 2.14.7 Declare Target Directive
A threadprivate variable cannot appear in the directive.
```
Besides, procedure name and the entity with PARAMETER attribute cannot
be in the threadprivate directive. The main program name and module name
cannot be in the threadprivate directive and declare target directive.
There is no clear description or restriction about the entity with
PARAMETER attribute in OpenMP 5.1 Specification, and a warning is given.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, shraiysh, NimishMishra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114941
This patch adds the support for `atomic compare` in parser. The support
in Sema and CodeGen will come soon. For now, it simply eimits an error when it
is encountered.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115561
Some kinds of Fortran arrays are declared with the same syntax,
and it is impossible to tell from a shape (:, :) or (*) whether
the object is assumed shape, deferred shape, assumed size, implied
shape, or whatever without recourse to more information about the
symbol in question. This patch softens the names of some predicate
functions (IsAssumedShape to CanBeAssumedShape) and makes others
more reflective of the syntax they represent (isAssumed to isStar)
in an attempt to encourage coders to seek and find definitive
predicate functions whose names deliver what they seem to mean.
Address TODO comments in IsSimplyContiguous() by using the
updated IsAssumedShape() predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114829
A quick fix last week to the shared library build caused
the predicate IsCoarray(const Symbol &) to be moved from
Semantics to Evaluate. This patch completes that move in
a way that properly combines the existing IsCoarray() tests
for expressions and other object with the test for a symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114806
To accommodate triangular implied DO loops in DATA statements, in which
the bounds of nested implied DO loops might depend on the values of the
indices of outer implied DO loops in the same DATA statement set, it
is necessary to run them through constant folding each time they are
encountered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114754
The predicate IsCoarray() needs to be in libFortranEvaluate so that
IsSaved() can call it without breaking the shared library build.
Pushed without pre-commit review as I'm moving code around and
the fix to the shared build is confirmed.
This legacy option (available in other Fortran compilers with various
spellings) implies the SAVE attribute for local variables on subprograms
that are not explicitly RECURSIVE. The SAVE attribute essentially implies
static rather than stack storage. This was the default setting in Fortran
until surprisingly recently, so explicit SAVE statements & attributes
could be and often were omitted from older codes. Note that initialized
objects already have an implied SAVE attribute, and objects in COMMON
effectively do too, as data overlays are extinct; and since objects that are
expected to survive from one invocation of a procedure to the next in static
storage should probably be explicit initialized in the first place, so the
use cases for this option are somewhat rare, and all of them could be
handled with explicit SAVE statements or attributes.
This implicit SAVE attribute must not apply to automatic (in the Fortran sense)
local objects, whose sizes cannot be known at compilation time. To get the
semantics of IsSaved() right, the IsAutomatic() predicate was moved into
Evaluate/tools.cpp to allow for dynamic linking of the compiler. The
redundant predicate IsAutomatic() was noticed, removed, and its uses replaced.
GNU Fortran's spelling of the option (-fno-automatic) was added to
the clang-based driver and used for basic sanity testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114209
Fortran defines LEN(X) = 0 after CHARACTER(LEN=-1)::X so
apply MAX(0, ...) to character length expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114030
The labels of WHERE constructs were being created within the scope of
the construct, not the scope of its parent, leading to incorrect error
messages for branches to that label.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113696
Previously, jumps to labels in constructs from exterior statements
would elicit only a warning. Upgrade these to errors unless the
branch into the construct would enter into only DO, IF, and SELECT CASE
constructs, whose interiors don't scope variables or have other
set-up/tear-down semantics. Branches into these "safe" constructs
are still errors if they're nested in an unsafe construct that doesn't
also enclose the exterior branch statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113310
A CHECK() in semantics is triggering when analyzing a program
with an undefined derived type pointer because the CHECK is
expecting a new error message to have been issued in a function
but not allowing for the case that a diagnostic could have been
produced earlier. Adjust the predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113307
The IsPointer check currently fails for host-associated symbols in OpenMP
regions. This causes some failures in semantic checks for pointer association
in an OpenMP region. Fix is to use the ultimate symbol in the call to the
IsPointer function in CheckPointerAssignment function in
lib/Semantics/pointer-assignment.cpp.
Reviewed By: klausler, peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112876
While "null()" is accepted as a data statement constant when it
corresponds to a pointer object, "null(mold=p)" and "null(p)"
are not allowed. The current error messages simply complain
that null is not an array. This patch adds a context-sensitive
message to the effect that a data statement constant followed
by non-empty parentheses must be an array or structure constructor.
(Note that f18 can't simply special-case the name "null" when parsing
data statement constants, since programs are free to repurpose that
name as an array or derived type.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112740
Check that when a procedure pointer is initialised or assigned with an intrinsic
function, or when its interface is being defined by one, that intrinsic function
is unrestricted specific (listed in Table 16.2 of F'2018).
Mark intrinsics LGE, LGT, LLE, and LLT as restricted specific. Getting their
classifications right helps in designing the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112381
This patch supports the atomic construct (read and write) following
section 2.17.7 of OpenMP 5.0 standard. Also added tests and
verifier for the same.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111992
Adds initial parsing and sema for the 'append_args' clause.
Note that an AST clause is not created as it instead adds its values
to the OMPDeclareVariantAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111854
Peter Klausler