option. Previously these options could both be used to specify that you were
compiling the implementation file of a module, with a different set of minor
bugs in each case.
This change removes -fmodule-implementation-of, and instead tracks a flag to
determine whether we're currently building a module. -fmodule-name now behaves
the same way that -fmodule-implementation-of previously did.
llvm-svn: 261372
We used to have a flag to enable module maps, and two more flags to enable
implicit module maps. This is all redundant; we don't need any flag for
enabling module maps in the abstract, and we don't usually have -fno- flags for
-cc1. We now have just a single flag, -fimplicit-module-maps, that enables
implicitly searching the file system for module map files and loading them.
The driver interface is unchanged for now. We should probably rename
-fmodule-maps to -fimplicit-module-maps at some point.
llvm-svn: 239789
the one in the current compiler invocation. If they differ reject the PCH.
This protects against the badness occurring from getting modules loaded from different module caches (see crashes).
rdar://19889860
llvm-svn: 229909
This flag specifies that we are building an implementation file of the
module <name>, preventing importing <name> as a module. This does not
consider this to be the 'current module' for the purposes of doing
modular checks like decluse or non-modular-include warnings, unlike
-fmodule-name.
This is needed as a stopgap until:
1) we can resolve relative includes to a VFS-mapped module (or can
safely import a header textually and as part of a module)
and ideally
2) we can safely do incremental rebuilding when implementation files
import submodules.
llvm-svn: 213767
Manman Ren