Follow the same custom legalisation strategy as used in D57085 for
variable-length shifts (see that patch summary for more discussion). Although
we may lose out on some late-stage DAG combines, I think this custom
legalisation strategy is ultimately easier to reason about.
There are some codegen changes in rv64m-exhaustive-w-insts.ll but they are all
neutral in terms of the number of instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57096
llvm-svn: 352171
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
As discussed on llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128497.html>, we have
to be careful when trying to select the *w RV64M instructions. i32 is not a
legal type for RV64 in the RISC-V backend, so operations have been promoted by
the time they reach instruction selection. Information about whether the
operation was originally a 32-bit operations has been lost, and it's easy to
write incorrect patterns.
Similarly to the variable 32-bit shifts, a DAG combine on ANY_EXTEND will
produce a SIGN_EXTEND if this is likely to result in sdiv/udiv/urem being
selected (and so save instructions to sext/zext the input operands).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53230
llvm-svn: 350993
Alex Bradbury