This was a missing piece.
We started to print LMAs and information about assignments,
but did not do that for assignments outside of section declarations yet.
The patch implements it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45314
llvm-svn: 348468
The test breaks on buildbots that don't enable the x86 backend. Other
tests in this directory explicitly require x86, so this should do the
trick.
llvm-svn: 348466
The test was fully rewritten for simplification.
New test code was suggested by David Blaikie.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55261
llvm-svn: 348464
This is a part of
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39885
Linker script specification says:
"You can specify a file name to include sections from a particular file. You would
do this if one or more of your files contain special data that needs to be at a
particular location in memory."
LLD did not accept this syntax. The patch implements it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55324
llvm-svn: 348463
I was finally able to quantify what i thought was missing in the fix,
it was vector constants. If we have a scalar (and %x, -1),
it will be instsimplified before we reach this code,
but if it is a vector, we may still have a -1 element.
Thus, we want to avoid the fold if *at least one* element is -1.
Or in other words, ignoring the undef elements, no sign bits
should be set. Thus, m_NonNegative().
A follow-up for rL348181
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39861
llvm-svn: 348462
This patch teaches LoopSimplifyCFG to delete loop blocks that have
become unreachable after terminator folding has been done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54023
Reviewed By: anna
llvm-svn: 348457
Support the Swift calling convention on Windows ARM and AArch64. Both
of these conform to the AAPCS, AAPCS64 calling convention, and LLVM has
been adjusted to account for the register usage. Ensure that the
frontend passes this into the backend. This allows the swift runtime to
be built for Windows.
llvm-svn: 348454
I just hard core goofed when I wrote this and created a different name
for no good reason. I'm failry aware of most "fresh" users of llvm-objcopy
(that is, users which are not using it as a drop in replacement for GNU
objcopy) and can say that only "-j" is being used by such people so this
patch should strictly increase compatibility and not remove it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52180
llvm-svn: 348446
This is a follow-up to D54989.
Work-around gcc-4.8 failing to handle brace-init for structs to imply
default-construction of an aggregate, and treats it as an initialiser
list instead.
llvm-svn: 348445
The code emitting AND-subtrees used to check whether any of the operands
was an OR in order to figure out if the result needs to be negated.
However the OR could be hidden in further subtrees and not immediately
visible.
Change the code so that canEmitConjunction() determines whether the
result of the generated subtree needs to be negated. Cleanup emission
logic to use this. I also changed the code a bit to make all negation
decisions early before we actually emit the subtrees.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR39550
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54137
llvm-svn: 348444
This patch adds the noderef attribute in clang and checks for dereferences of
types that have this attribute. This attribute is currently used by sparse and
would like to be ported to clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49511
llvm-svn: 348442
Continuation of D54989.
Additional changes:
- Use `.AppendEmplace(...)` instead of `.Append(Type{...})` to appease
GCC 4.8 with confusion on when an initializer_list is used as
opposed to a temporary aggregate initialized object.
llvm-svn: 348438
Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not
a matter of availability markup.
This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly
marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition
of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of
whether visibility annotations are enabled.
llvm-svn: 348436
This patch creates a new context for every function definition we enter.
Currently we do not push and pop on these, usually working off of the global
context record added in the Sema constructor, which never gets popped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54014
llvm-svn: 348434
Refactoring.
This map was only used when we used a string of integers to output the outlined
sequence. Since it's no longer used for anything, there's no reason to keep it
around.
llvm-svn: 348432
These opcodes are intended to subsume some of the capability of G_MERGE_VALUES,
as it was too powerful and thus complex to add deal with throughout the GISel
pipeline.
G_BUILD_VECTOR creates a vector value from a sequence of uniformly typed
scalar values. G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC is a special opcode for handling scalar
operands which are larger than the destination vector element type, and
therefore does an implicit truncate.
G_CONCAT_VECTOR creates a vector by concatenating smaller, uniformly typed,
vectors together.
These will be used in a subsequent commit. This commit just adds the initial
infrastructure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53594
llvm-svn: 348430
More refactoring.
Since the pruning logic has changed, and the candidate list is gone,
everything can be sunk into findCandidates.
We no longer need to keep track of the length of the longest substring, so we
can drop all of that logic as well.
After this, we just find all of the candidates and move to outlining.
llvm-svn: 348428
More refactoring.
After the changes to the pruning logic, and removing CandidateList, there's
no reason for Candiates to be shared_ptrs (or pointers at all).
std::shared_ptr<Candidate> -> Candidate.
llvm-svn: 348427
This change caused SEGVs in instcombine. (The r347934 change seems to me to be a
precipitating cause, not a root cause. Details are on the llvm-commits thread
for r347934.)
llvm-svn: 348426
Summary:
We decided to change the event section code from 12 to 13 as new
`DataCount` section in the bulk memory operations proposal will take the
code 12 instead.
Reviewers: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55343
llvm-svn: 348424
Extracting from a splat constant is always handled by InstSimplify.
Move the test for this from InstCombine to InstSimplify to make
sure that stays true.
llvm-svn: 348423
Since we're now performing outlining per OutlinedFunction rather than per
Candidate, we can simply outline each candidate as it shows up.
Instead of having a pruning phase, instead, we'll outline entire functions.
Then we'll update the UnsignedVec we mapped to reflect the deletion. If any
candidate is in a space that's marked dirty, then we'll drop it.
This lets us remove the pruning logic entirely, and greatly simplifies the
code.
llvm-svn: 348420
Stephen Kelly