Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
It was previously thought that Sema::InstantiateClass could not fail
from within this point in instantiate.
However, it can happen if the class is invalid some way (i.e. invalid
base specifier).
This fixes PR18907.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2850
llvm-svn: 201913
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
issue 1430. Don't allow a pack expansion to be used as an argument to an alias
template unless the corresponding parameter is a parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 198833
We would lose track of the mangling number assigned to the original
declaration which would cause us to create manglings that didn't match
the Itanium C++ specification.
e.g. Two static fields with the same name inside of a function template
would receive the same mangling with LLVM fixing up the second field so
they wouldn't collide. This would create an incompatibility with other
compilers following the Itanium ABI.
I've confirmed that the new mangling is identical to the ones generated
by icc and gcc.
N.B. This was uncovered while working on Microsoft mangler.
llvm-svn: 196368
We wouldn't properly save and restore the pending local instantiations
we had built up prior to instantiation of a variable definition. This
would lead to us instantiating too much causing crashes and other
general badness.
This fixes PR14374.
llvm-svn: 195887
We would fail to instantiate them when the surrounding function was
instantiated. Instantiate the class and add it's members to the list of
pending instantiations, they should be resolved when we are finished
with the function's body.
This fixes PR9685.
llvm-svn: 195827
can't accidentally be allocated the wrong way (missing prefix data for decls
from AST files, for instance) and simplifies the CreateDeserialized functions a
little. An extra DeclContext* parameter to the not-from-AST-file operator new
allows us to ensure that we don't accidentally call the wrong one when
deserializing (when we don't have a DeclContext), allows some extra checks, and
prepares for some planned modules-related changes to Decl allocation.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 195426
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
Another attempt caused a test to fail (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091533.html) and also had to be reverted - my apologies - in my haste, i did not run all the tests - argh!
Now all the tests seem to pass - but a Fixme has been added - since I suspect Richard will find the fix a little inelegant ;) I shall try and work on a more elegant fix once I have had a chance to discuss with Richard or Doug at a later date.
Hopefully the third time;s a charm *fingers crossed*
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193230
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
modules.
With this fixed, I no longer see any test regressions in the libc++ test suite
when enabling a single-module module.map for libc++ (other than issues with my
system headers).
llvm-svn: 193219
lambdas nested within templates and themselves.
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193216
The bool conversion operator on InstantiatingTemplate never added value and
only served to obfuscate the template instantiation routines.
This replaces the conversion and its callers with an explicit isInvalid()
function to make it clear what's going on at a glance.
llvm-svn: 192177
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090048.html
When I first committed this patch - a bunch of buildbots were unable to compile the code that VS2010 seemed to compile. Seems like there was a dependency on Sema/Template.h which VS did not seem to need, but I have now added for the other compilers. It still compiles on Visual Studio 2010 - lets hope the buildbots remain quiet (please!)
llvm-svn: 191879
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 191875
TemplateDeclInstantiator takes the MultiLevelArgumentList by const-ref
and stores a const-ref member. Thus, we must not pass a temporary
into the constructor.
llvm-svn: 191665
template and defined outside it, don't instantiate it twice when instantiating
the surrounding class template specialization. That would cause us to reject
the code because we think two partial specializations instantiated to produce
the same signature.
llvm-svn: 191418
an additional conversion (other than a qualification conversion) would be
required after the explicit conversion.
Conversely, do allow explicit conversion functions to be used when initializing
a temporary for a reference binding in direct-list-initialization.
llvm-svn: 191150
variable from being the function to being the enclosing namespace scope (in
C++) or the TU (in C). This allows us to fix a selection of related issues
where we would build incorrect redeclaration chains for such declarations, and
fail to notice type mismatches.
Such declarations are put into a new IdentifierNamespace, IDNS_LocalExtern,
which is only found when searching scopes, and not found when searching
DeclContexts. Such a declaration is only made visible in its DeclContext if
there are no non-LocalExtern declarations.
llvm-svn: 191064
Summary:
When selecting a mangling for an anonymous tag type:
- We should first try it's typedef'd name.
- If that doesn't work, we should mangle in the name of the declarator
that specified it as a declaration specifier.
- If that doesn't work, fall back to a static mangling of
<unnamed-type>.
This should make our anonymous type mangling compatible.
This partially fixes PR16994; we would need to have an implementation of
scope numbering to get it right (a separate issue).
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, rjmccall, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1540
llvm-svn: 190892
When an AST file is built based on another AST file, it can use a decl from
the fist file, and therefore mark the "isUsed" bit. We need to note this in
the AST file so that the bit is set correctly when the second AST file is
loaded.
This patch introduces the distinction between setIsUsed() and markUsed() so
that we don't call into the ASTMutationListener callback when it wouldn't
be appropriate.
Fixes PR16635.
llvm-svn: 190016
Summary:
We would not perform substitution at an appropriate point, allowing strange
results to appear. We would accepts things that we shouldn't or mangle things incorrectly. Note that this hasn't fixed the other cases like
template-template parameters or non-type template parameters.
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rjmccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1507
llvm-svn: 189540
This was only used to ensure that the traversal order was the same as the
insertion order, but that guarantee was already being provided by the use
of a FoldingSetVector.
llvm-svn: 189075
Summary:
HandleTopLevelDecl on a templated function leads us to try and mangle
it.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1412
llvm-svn: 188536
referenced as a member of the current instantiation. In that case, deduce the
type of the function to a dependent type rather than exposing an undeduced auto
type to the rest of the current instantiation.
The standard doesn't really say that the type is dependent in this case; I'll
bring this up with CWG.
llvm-svn: 188410
When a local extern declaration redeclares some other entity, the type of that
entity is merged with the prior type if the prior declaration is visible (in C)
or is declared in the same scope (in C++).
- Make LookupRedeclarationWithLinkage actually work in C++, use it in the right
set of cases, and make it track whether it found a shadowed declaration.
- Track whether we found a declaration in the same scope (for C++) including
across serialization and template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 188307
This change unifies the logic for template instantiation of methods and
functions declared with typedefs.
It ensures that SubstFunctionType() always fills the Params out param
with non-null ParmVarDecls or returns null.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1135
llvm-svn: 187528
No functionality change.
In Sema helper functions:
* renamed isTypeName as HasTypenameKeyword
In UsingDecl:
* renamed get/setUsingLocation to get/setUsingLoc
* renamed is/setTypeName as has/setTypename
llvm-svn: 186816
r186331).
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186546
This breaks the build of basic patterns with repeated friend
declarations. See the added test case in SemaCXX/friend.cpp or the test
case reported to the original commit log.
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186331
does not substitute a sizeof-pack expression.
The solution is proposed by Richard Smith.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D869
llvm-svn: 186306
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186199
fix is.
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186185
lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle friend
declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior declaration, rather
than setting a friend declaration to be visible whenever there was a prior
declaration.
llvm-svn: 186040
This replaces a long list of declarations for visitor functions with
a list generated from DeclNodes.inc. Nothing really interesting came
out of it; we had comprehensive coverage anyway
(excluding FriendTemplateDecls).
llvm-svn: 185118
As noted by Richard in the post:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130624/082605.html, the following code should not add an entry
into PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations, since local instantiations
should only occur within the context of other instantiations:
int foo(double y) {
struct Lambda {
template<class T> T operator()(T t) const { return t; };
} lambda;
return lambda(y);
}
Hence the attached code does the following:
1) In MarkFunctionReferenced, check if ActiveInstantiations.size()
is non-zero before adding to PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations.
2) In InstantiateFunctionDefinition, we swap out/in
PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations so that only those
pending local instantiations that are added during the instantiation
of the current function are instantiated recursively.
llvm-svn: 184903
places which weren't setting it up properly. This allows us to get the right
cv-qualifiers for 'this' when it appears outside a method body in a class
template.
llvm-svn: 183483
instantiate the inherited constructor template and mark that as the constructor
which the instantiated specialization is inheriting. This fixes a
crash-on-valid when trying to compute the exception specification of a
specialization of the inheriting constructor.
llvm-svn: 182072
We keep the "as written" storage class, but that is a fuzzy concept for
instantiations. With this patch instantiations of methods of class templates
now get a storage class that is based on the semantics of isStatic(). With this
can simplify isStatic() itself.
llvm-svn: 179521
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
just using ASTConsumer::HandleCXXStaticMemberVarInstantiation(), don't pass it with
ASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl.
ASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl is intended for user-written top-level decls;
a consumer can treat an instantiated static data member however it wants of course.
llvm-svn: 175976
the normal attribute-merging path, because we can't merge alignment attributes
without knowing the complete set of alignment attributes which apply to a
particular declaration.
llvm-svn: 175861
Aaron Ballman