For some reason there are both of these available, except
for scalar 64-bit compares which only has u64. I'm not sure
why there are both (I'm guessing it's for the one bit inputs we
don't use), but for consistency always using the
unsigned one.
llvm-svn: 282832
In case of COPY-like instruction we may be able to deduce that a certain
input is unused, based on the used lanes of the register defined by the
instruction.
This even works accross otherwise incompatible copies (no need to have
compatible lanemasks, completely unused operands are still completely
unused). It even makes sense to redo the analysis in this case since we
gained information for a case we previously stopped at because of the
incompatible masks.
llvm-svn: 268815
Summary:
This includes a hazard recognizer implementation to replace some of
the hazard handling we had during frame index elimination.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18602
llvm-svn: 268143
Summary:
The goal is for each operand type to have its own parse function and
at the same time share common code for tracking state as different
instruction types share operand types (e.g. glc/glc_flat, etc).
Introduce parseAMDGPUOperand which can parse any optional operand.
DPP and Clamp/OMod have custom handling for now. Sam also suggested
to have class hierarchy for operand types instead of table. This
can be done in separate change.
Remove parseVOP3OptionalOps, parseDS*OptionalOps, parseFlatOptionalOps,
parseMubufOptionalOps, parseDPPOptionalOps.
Reduce number of definitions of AsmOperand's and MatchClasses' by using common base class.
Rename AsmMatcher/InstPrinter methods accordingly.
Print immediate type when printing parsed immediate operand.
Use 'off' if offset/index register is unused instead of skipping it to make it more readable (also agreed with SP3).
Update tests.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, SamWot, artem.tamazov
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19584
llvm-svn: 268015
Summary:
This pass is unnecessary and overly conservative. It was motivated by
situations like
def %vreg0:SGPR_32
...
if-block:
..
def %vreg1:SGPR_32
...
else-block:
...
use %vreg0:SGPR_32
...
and similar situations with uses after the non-uniform control flow, where
we are not allowed to assign %vreg0 and %vreg1 to the same physical register,
even though in the original, thread/workitem-based CFG, it looks like the
live ranges of these registers do not overlap.
However, by the time register allocation runs, we have moved to a wave-based
CFG that accurately represents the fact that the wave may run through both
the if- and the else-block. So the live ranges of %vreg0 and %vreg1 already
overlap even without the SIFixSGPRLiveRanges pass.
In addition to proving this change correct, I have tested it with Piglit
and a small number of other tests.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: MatzeB, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19041
llvm-svn: 266345
Summary:
This results in higher register usage, but should make it easier for
the compiler to hide latency.
This pass is a prerequisite for some more scheduler improvements, and I
think the increase register usage with this patch is acceptable, because
when combined with the scheduler improvements, the total register usage
will decrease.
shader-db stats:
2382 shaders in 478 tests
Totals:
SGPRS: 48672 -> 49088 (0.85 %)
VGPRS: 34148 -> 34847 (2.05 %)
Code Size: 1285816 -> 1289128 (0.26 %) bytes
LDS: 28 -> 28 (0.00 %) blocks
Scratch: 492544 -> 573440 (16.42 %) bytes per wave
Max Waves: 6856 -> 6846 (-0.15 %)
Wait states: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
Depends on D18451
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18452
llvm-svn: 264876
A call to removeEmptySubranges() is necessary after every operation that
potentially removes all segments from a subregister range; this case in
the register coalescer was missing.
llvm-svn: 241027
Matt Arsenault