Specifically, typo correction should be done before dispatching between
different kinds of binary operations like pseudo-object assignment,
overloaded binary operation, etc.
Without this change we hit an assertion
Assertion failed: (!LHSExpr->hasPlaceholderType(BuiltinType::PseudoObject)), function CheckAssignmentOperands
when in Objective-C we reference a property without `self` and there are
2 equally good typo correction candidates: ivar and a class name. In
this case LHS expression in `BuildBinOp` is
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr
`-TypoExpr
and instead of handling Obj-C property assignment as pseudo-object
assignment, we call `CreateBuiltinBinOp` which corrects typo to
ObjCPropertyRefExpr '<pseudo-object type>'
but cannot handle pseudo-objects and asserts about it (indirectly,
through `CheckAssignmentOperands`).
rdar://problem/33102722
Reviewers: rsmith, ahatanak, majnemer
Reviewed By: ahatanak
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37322
llvm-svn: 313323
-Wobjc-messaging-id is a new, non-default warning that warns about
message sends to unqualified id in Objective-C. This warning is useful
for projects that would like to avoid any potential future compiler
errors/warnings, as the system frameworks might add a method with the same
selector which could make the message send to id ambiguous.
rdar://33303354
llvm-svn: 311779
This commit fixes a bug introduced in r307903. The attribute ambiguity checker
that was introduced in r307903 checked all property attributes, which caused
errors for source-compatible properties, like:
@property (nonatomic, readonly) NSObject *prop;
@property (nonatomic, readwrite) NSObject *prop;
because the readwrite property would get implicit 'strong' attribute. The
ambiguity checker should be concerned about explicitly specified attributes
only.
rdar://33748089
llvm-svn: 311443
This made it awkward to switch over an enum where some entries
are partial and is unlikley to catch any bugs.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36777
llvm-svn: 311191
We do not meaningfully track object const-ness of Objective-C object
types. Silence the -Wcast-qual warning that is issued when casting to or
from Objective-C object types results in losing const qualification.
rdar://problem/33807915
llvm-svn: 310672
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
be shared without warnings. Build AttributedTypes to leave breadcrumbs
for tools like the static analyzer. Warn about attempting to use the
attribute with incompatible return types.
llvm-svn: 308092
property and check for incompatible attributes
This commit changes the way ambiguous property synthesis (i.e. when synthesizing
a property that's declared in multiple protocols) is performed. Previously,
Clang synthesized the first property that was found. This lead to problems when
the property was synthesized in a class that conformed to two protocols that
declared that property and a second protocols had a 'readwrite' declaration -
the setter was not synthesized so the class didn't really conform to the second
protocol and user's code would crash at runtime when they would try to set the
property.
This commit ensures that a first readwrite property is selected. This is a
semantic change that changes users code in this manner:
```
@protocol P @property(readonly) int p; @end
@protocol P2 @property(readwrite) id p; @end
@interface I <P2> @end
@implementation I
@syntesize p; // Users previously got a warning here, and Clang synthesized
// readonly 'int p' here. Now Clang synthesizes readwrite 'id' p..
@end
```
To ensure that this change is safe, the warning about incompatible types is
promoted to an error when this kind of readonly/readwrite ambiguity is detected
in the @implementation. This will ensure that previous code that had this subtle
bug and ignored the warning now will fail to compile with an error, and users
should not get suprises at runtime once they resolve the error.
The commit also extends the ambiguity checker, and now it can detect conflicts
among the different property attributes. An error diagnostic is used for
conflicting attributes, to ensure that the user won't get "suprises" at runtime.
ProtocolPropertyMap is removed in favour of a a set + vector because the map's
order of iteration is non-deterministic, so it couldn't be used to select the
readwrite property.
rdar://31579994
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35268
llvm-svn: 307903
Objective-C subscript expressions report errors when a subscript method is not
declared in the base class. However, prior to this commit, qualified id types
were not checked. This commit ensures that an appropriate error is reported
when a subscript method is not declared in any of the protocols that are
included in the qualified id type.
rdar://33213924
llvm-svn: 307642
requirements in protocol/class/category declarations
The unguarded availability warnings in the protocol requirements of a protocol
/class/category declaration can be avoided. This matches the behaviour of
Swift's diagnostics. The warnings for deprecated/unavailable protocols are
preserved.
rdar://33156429
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35061
llvm-svn: 307368
The new compiler warning -Wunguarded-availability-new is a subset of
-Wunguarded-availability. It is on by default. It only warns about uses of APIs
that have been introduced in macOS >= 10.13, iOS >= 11, watchOS >= 4 and
tvOS >= 11. We decided to use this kind of solution as we didn't want to turn
on -Wunguarded-availability by default, because we didn't want our users to get
warnings about uses of old APIs in their existing projects.
rdar://31054725
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34264
llvm-svn: 306033
These diagnostics can't be disabled, and can't actually catch any bugs.
rdar://32427296
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33661
llvm-svn: 304306
This is an initial commit to allow using it with constant expressions, a follow-up commit will enable full support for it in ObjC methods.
llvm-svn: 303712
As discovered by ChenWJ and listed on cfe-dev, the error for Objective C
return type ended up being wrong. This fixes that. Additionally, as a
"while we're there", the other usages of this error and the usage of the
FP above both use a FixItHint, so I'll add it here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32759
llvm-svn: 302720
`__builtin_available`
This commit allows us to use the macOS/iOS/tvOS/watchOS platform names in
`@available`/`__builtin_available`.
rdar://32067795
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33000
llvm-svn: 302540
whose introduced version is lower than the allowed version.
We should just rely on the target version as this introduced version can lead
to false positives (e.g. deprecated declarations).
rdar://31964333
llvm-svn: 302250
for iOS < 9 and OS X < 10.11 X86 targets
This commit adds a new error that disallows methods that have parameters/return
values with a vector type for some older X86 targets. This diagnostic is
needed because objc_msgSend doesn't support SIMD vector registers/return values
on X86 in iOS < 9 and OS X < 10.11. Note that we don't necessarily know if the
vector argument/return value will use a SIMD register, so instead we chose to
be conservative and prohibit all vector types.
rdar://21662309
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28670
llvm-svn: 301532
blocks and lambdas
Prior to this commit Clang emitted the old "partial availability" warning for
expressions that referred to declarations that were not yet introduced in
blocks and lambdas that were not in a function/method. This commit ensures that
top-level blocks and lambdas use the new unguarded availability checks.
rdar://31835952
llvm-svn: 301409
Summary: clang should produce the same errors Objective-C classes that cannot be assigned to weak pointers under both -fobjc-arc and -fobjc-weak. Check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when analyzing pointer conversions. Add an -fobjc-weak pass to the existing arc-unavailable-for-weakref test cases to verify the behavior is the same.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31006
llvm-svn: 299014
Summary: -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak should produce the same warnings with -fobjc-weak as it does with -objc-arc. Also check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when recording the use of an evaluated weak variable. Add a -fobjc-weak run to the existing arc-repeated-weak test case and adapt it slightly to work in both modes.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, jordan_rose, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: arphaman, rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31005
llvm-svn: 299011
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
that became supported after r297019
The commit r297019 expanded the performSelector ObjC method family heuristic
to ensure that -Wobjc-unsafe-perform-selector covers all performSelector
variations. However, this made the -Warc-performSelector-leaks too noisy, as
that warning produces mostly false positives since the selector is unknown.
This commit reverts the ObjC method family heuristics introduced in r297019.
This ensures that -Warc-performSelector-leaks isn't too noisy. The commit still
preserves the coverage of -Wobjc-unsafe-perform-selector.
rdar://31124629
llvm-svn: 298587
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
The instance method 'self' does not actually return an over-retained object,
so we shouldn't report an error when it's used with 'performSelector'.
rdar://31071620
llvm-svn: 297961
instance of a qualified Class object when that instance method comes from
a protocol that's implemented by NSObject
Instance methods from a root class like NSObject are also class methods because
the metaclass of root class derives from that root class. Therefore, we can
avoid the warning for instances of qualified Class objects that point to classes
that derive from NSObject. Note that we actually don't know if a Class instance
points to a class that derives from NSObject at compile-time, so we have to
make a reasonable assumption that the majority of instances will do so.
rdar://22812517
llvm-svn: 297862
that return record or vector types
The performSelector family of methods from Foundation use objc_msgSend to
dispatch the selector invocations to objects. However, method calls to methods
that return record types might have to use the objc_msgSend_stret as the return
value won't find into the register. This is also supported by this sentence from
performSelector documentation: "The method should not have a significant return
value and should take a single argument of type id, or no arguments". This
commit adds a new warning that warns when a selector which corresponds to a
method that returns a record type is passed into performSelector.
rdar://12056271
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30174
llvm-svn: 297019
Using the constructed name for the class properties with dot syntax may
yield an inappropriate selector (i.e. if it is specified via property
attributes). Prefer the declaration for the selector, falling back to
the constructed name otherwise.
Patch by David Herzka!
llvm-svn: 295683
Volodymyr Sapsai