Commit Graph

31 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer dc169759ca [MS ABI] Correctly mangling vbase destructors
They are a little bit of a special case in the mangling. They are always
mangled without taking into account their virtual-ness of the
destructor. They are also mangled to return void, unlike the actual
destructor.

This fixes PR31931.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29912

llvm-svn: 295010
2017-02-14 00:54:11 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 2849c4e841 CodeGen: New vtable group representation: struct of vtable arrays.
In a future change, this representation will allow us to use the new inrange
annotation on getelementptr to allow the optimizer to split vtable groups.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22296

llvm-svn: 289584
2016-12-13 20:40:39 +00:00
Reid Kleckner e5a321b5e8 [MS] Fix prologue this adjustment when 'this' is passed indirectly
Move the logic for doing this from the ABI argument lowering into
EmitParmDecl, which runs for all parameters. Our codegen is slightly
suboptimal in this case, as we may leave behind a dead store after
optimization, but it's 32-bit inalloca, and this fixes the bug in a
robust way.

Fixes PR30293

llvm-svn: 280836
2016-09-07 18:21:30 +00:00
David Majnemer 7f980d842c [MS ABI] Don't crash when zero-initializing a vbase which contains a vbase
Bases can be zero-initialized: the storage is zero-initialized before
the base constructor is run.
The MS ABI has a quirk where base VBPtrs are not installed by the
base constructor but by the most derived class.  In particular, they are
installed before the base constructor is run.
The derived constructor must be careful to zero-initialize only the bits
of the class which haven't already been populated by virtual base
pointers.

While we correctly avoided this scenario, we didn't handle the case
where the base class has virtual bases which have virtual bases.

llvm-svn: 269271
2016-05-12 03:51:52 +00:00
Reid Kleckner f985033202 Fix use of LLVM IR names in lit test
llvm-svn: 268419
2016-05-03 18:48:50 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 4b60f30a12 [MS] Pass CalleeDecl to adjustThisArgumentForVirtualFunctionCall
If we are devirtualizing, then we want to compute the 'this' adjustment
of the devirtualized target, not the adjustment of the base's method
definition, which is usually zero.

Fixes PR27621

llvm-svn: 268418
2016-05-03 18:44:29 +00:00
Pete Cooper 3b39e88ae0 Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."
This reverts commit r253512.

This likely broke the bots in:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787

llvm-svn: 253542
2015-11-19 05:55:59 +00:00
Pete Cooper 7bfd5cb7be Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.
This is a follow on from a similar LLVM commit: r253511.

Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer.  It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.

This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments.  The alignment
argument itself is removed.

The only code change to clang is hidden in CGBuilder.h which now passes
both dest and source alignment to IRBuilder, instead of taking the minimum of
dest and source alignments.

Reviewed by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 253512
2015-11-18 22:18:45 +00:00
David Majnemer 8671c6e03d [MS ABI] Don't zero-initialize vbptrs in bases
Certain CXXConstructExpr nodes require zero-initialization before a
constructor is called.  We had a bug in the case where the constructor
is called on a virtual base: we zero-initialized the base's vbptr field.
A complementary bug is present in MSVC where no zero-initialization
occurs for the subobject at all.

This fixes PR25370.

llvm-svn: 251783
2015-11-02 09:01:44 +00:00
John McCall 7f416cc426 Compute and preserve alignment more faithfully in IR-generation.
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment.  Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values.  Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate.  Require alignments to be non-zero.  Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.

As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.

The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned.  Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay.  I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.

Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.

We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment.  In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.

Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs.  For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint.  That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.

ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments.  In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments.  That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.

I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin.  Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.

llvm-svn: 246985
2015-09-08 08:05:57 +00:00
David Blaikie a953f2825b Update Clang tests to handle explicitly typed load changes in LLVM.
llvm-svn: 230795
2015-02-27 21:19:58 +00:00
David Blaikie 218b783192 Update Clang tests to handle explicitly typed gep changes in LLVM.
llvm-svn: 230783
2015-02-27 19:18:17 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 8d58513da4 Cast vtable address points to i32 (...)** to enable more globalopt
We currently use i32 (...)** as the type of the vptr field in the LLVM
struct type. LLVM's GlobalOpt prefers any bitcasts to be on the side of
the data being stored rather than on the pointer being stored to.

Reviewers: majnemer

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5916

llvm-svn: 223267
2014-12-03 21:00:21 +00:00
David Majnemer 0c0b6d9ac6 MS ABI: Properly call global delete when invoking virtual destructors
Summary:
The Itanium ABI approach of using offset-to-top isn't possible with the
MS ABI, it doesn't have that kind of information lying around.

Instead, we do the following:
- Call the virtual deleting destructor with the "don't delete the object
  flag" set.  The virtual deleting destructor will return a pointer to
  'this' adjusted to the most derived class.
- Call the global delete using the adjusted 'this' pointer.

Reviewers: rnk

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5996

llvm-svn: 220993
2014-10-31 20:09:12 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 0ba8ba4eca MS ABI: Emit more canonical vbptr stores and loads
This eliminates some i8* GEPs and makes the IR that clang emits a bit
more canonical. More work is needed for vftables, but that isn't a clear
win so I plan to send it for review.

llvm-svn: 220398
2014-10-22 17:26:00 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 67c969367a Add one more test for PR19172
llvm-svn: 204453
2014-03-21 11:07:24 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov ba5570221d Fix PR19172 - wrong this adjustment calculated for virtual destructor in a class with complex inheritance
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3128

llvm-svn: 204394
2014-03-20 20:38:34 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov f1749427c5 Fix PR19104: Incorrect handling of non-virtual calls of virtual methods
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3054

llvm-svn: 203949
2014-03-14 17:43:37 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov a895758203 Fix PR18967 -- Bad this adjustment for virtual methods in a diamond virtual inheritance hierarchy
llvm-svn: 203222
2014-03-07 09:34:59 +00:00
Hans Wennborg d7895aca99 [MS ABI] Error instead of generating bad vftables for certain virtual hierarchies (PR18967)
Erroring out until we fix the bug means we don't have to keep chasing down
this same miscompile in a bunch of different places.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2890

llvm-svn: 202331
2014-02-27 01:14:31 +00:00
Hans Wennborg c9bd88e681 Remove the -cxx-abi command-line flag.
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.

To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545

llvm-svn: 199250
2014-01-14 19:35:09 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 340ad862d9 [ms-abi] Always generate complete constructors in the Microsoft C++ ABI
Fixes PR18435, where we generated a base ctor instead of a complete
ctor, and so failed to construct virtual bases when constructing the
complete object.

llvm-svn: 199160
2014-01-13 22:57:31 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 827365ea8f Use GEPs correctly when adjusting this in MicrosoftCXXABI
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1977

llvm-svn: 193176
2013-10-22 18:15:24 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 62082b7e0b [-cxx-abi microsoft] Fix this argument/parameter offsets for virtual destructors in the presence of virtual bases
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1939

llvm-svn: 192822
2013-10-16 18:24:06 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov b648732230 Initialize vtorDisp in class constructors and destructors
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1867

llvm-svn: 192312
2013-10-09 18:16:58 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov ad9d3b8fd1 Reland 192220 "Abstract out parts of thunk emission code, add support for simple thunks when using -cxx-abi microsoft" with relaxed assertions
llvm-svn: 192285
2013-10-09 09:23:58 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov c7113073dd Revert 192220 as it fails on an assertion
llvm-svn: 192225
2013-10-08 20:09:50 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 1ffb3916ce Abstract out parts of thunk emission code, add support for simple thunks when using -cxx-abi microsoft
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1787

llvm-svn: 192220
2013-10-08 19:15:38 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 8b5987eba5 Abstract out the emission of vtables, add basic support for vtable emission when using -cxx-abi microsoft
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1532

llvm-svn: 191523
2013-09-27 14:48:01 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 88fd439a24 Abstract out virtual calls and virtual function prologue code generation; implement them for -cxx-abi microsoft
llvm-svn: 188870
2013-08-21 06:25:03 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 66f82e68c3 [ms-cxxabi] Move CodeGenVTables::needsVTTParameter to ItaniumCXXABI.
This function only makes sense there.  Eventually it should no longer
be part of the CGCXXABI interface, as it is an Itanium-specific detail.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D821

llvm-svn: 185213
2013-06-28 20:45:28 +00:00