Introduce CXXStdInitializerListExpr node, representing the implicit
construction of a std::initializer_list<T> object from its underlying array.
The AST representation of such an expression goes from an InitListExpr with a
flag set, to a CXXStdInitializerListExpr containing a MaterializeTemporaryExpr
containing an InitListExpr (possibly wrapped in a CXXBindTemporaryExpr).
This more detailed representation has several advantages, the most important of
which is that the new MaterializeTemporaryExpr allows us to directly model
lifetime extension of the underlying temporary array. Using that, this patch
*drastically* simplifies the IR generation of this construct, provides IR
generation support for nested global initializer_list objects, fixes several
bugs where the destructors for the underlying array would accidentally not get
invoked, and provides constant expression evaluation support for
std::initializer_list objects.
llvm-svn: 183872
CXXCtorInitializers to the point where we perform the questionable lifetime
extension. This exposed a selection of false negatives in the warning.
llvm-svn: 183869
places which weren't setting it up properly. This allows us to get the right
cv-qualifiers for 'this' when it appears outside a method body in a class
template.
llvm-svn: 183483
Disallowing deriving from classes that have private virtual base classes
except in instances where the deriving class would be able to cast
itself to the private virtual base via a different derivation.
llvm-svn: 183462
Still missing cases for templates, but this is a step in the right
direction. Also omits suggestions that would be ambiguous (eg: void
func(int = 0); + void func(float = 0); func;)
llvm-svn: 183173
materialized temporary with the corresponding MaterializeTemporaryExpr. This is
groundwork for providing C++11's guaranteed static initialization for global
references bound to lifetime-extended temporaries (if the initialization is a
constant expression).
In passing, fix a couple of bugs where some evaluation failures didn't trigger
diagnostics, and a rejects-valid where potential constant expression testing
would assume that it knew the dynamic type of *this and would reject programs
which relied on it being some derived type.
llvm-svn: 183093
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
- References to ObjC bit-field ivars are bit-field lvalues;
fixes rdar://13794269, which got me started down this.
- Introduce Expr::refersToBitField, switch a couple users to
it where semantically important, and comment the difference
between this and the existing API.
- Discourage Expr::getBitField by making it a bit longer and
less general-sounding.
- Lock down on const_casts of bit-field gl-values until we
hear back from the committee as to whether they're allowed.
llvm-svn: 181252
to use. This makes very little difference right now (other than suppressing
follow-on errors in some cases), but will matter more once we support deduced
return types (we don't want expressions with undeduced return types in the
AST).
llvm-svn: 181107
Instead, we check for one line extern "C" context in linkage computation and
when deciding if a variable is a definition.
This hopefully completes the transition to having "as written" semantics for
hasExternalStorage.
llvm-svn: 180258
statement in constexpr functions. Everything which doesn't require variable
mutation is also allowed as an extension in C++11. 'void' becomes a literal
type to support constexpr functions which return 'void'.
llvm-svn: 180022
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in
CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer.
There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can
refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure
that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation.
llvm-svn: 179958
For this source:
const int &ref = someStruct.bitfield;
We used to generate this AST:
DeclStmt [...]
`-VarDecl [...] ref 'const int &'
`-MaterializeTemporaryExpr [...] 'const int' lvalue
`-ImplicitCastExpr [...] 'const int' lvalue <NoOp>
`-MemberExpr [...] 'int' lvalue bitfield .bitfield [...]
`-DeclRefExpr [...] 'struct X' lvalue ParmVar [...] 'someStruct' 'struct X'
Notice the lvalue inside the MaterializeTemporaryExpr, which is very
confusing (and caused an assertion to fire in the analyzer - PR15694).
We now generate this:
DeclStmt [...]
`-VarDecl [...] ref 'const int &'
`-MaterializeTemporaryExpr [...] 'const int' lvalue
`-ImplicitCastExpr [...] 'int' <LValueToRValue>
`-MemberExpr [...] 'int' lvalue bitfield .bitfield [...]
`-DeclRefExpr [...] 'struct X' lvalue ParmVar [...] 'someStruct' 'struct X'
Which makes a lot more sense. This allows us to remove code in both
CodeGen and AST that hacked around this special case.
The commit also makes Clang accept this (legal) C++11 code:
int &&ref = std::move(someStruct).bitfield
PR15694 / <rdar://problem/13600396>
llvm-svn: 179250
constructor. This isn't quite perfect (as usual, we don't handle default
arguments correctly yet, and we don't deal with copy/move constructors for
arguments correctly either, but this will be fixed when we implement core issue
1351.
This completes our support for inheriting constructors.
llvm-svn: 179154
We were assuming that any expression used as a converted constant
expression would either not have a folded constant value or would be
an integer, which is not the case for some ill-formed constant
expressions. Because converted constant expressions are only used
where integral values are expected, we can simply treat this as an
error path. If that ever changes, we'll need to widen the interface of
Sema::CheckConvertedConstantExpression() anyway.
llvm-svn: 179068
This fixes a regression I introduced in r178136, where we would not
consider the using directives from the semantic declaration contexts
that aren't represented by the lexical scopes (Scope) when performing
unqualified name lookup. This lead to horribly funny diagnostics like
"no identifier named 'foo'; did you mean 'foo'?".
llvm-svn: 179067
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
visible. There's a lot of potential badness in how we're modelling
these things, but getting this much correct is reasonably easy.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178488
the normal attribute-merging path, because we can't merge alignment attributes
without knowing the complete set of alignment attributes which apply to a
particular declaration.
llvm-svn: 175861
accessible in its declaring class; otherwise we might
fail to apply [class.protected] when considering
accessibility in derived classes.
Noticed by inspection; <rdar://13270329>.
I had an existing test wrong. Here's why it's wrong:
Follow the rules (and notation) of [class.access]p5.
The naming class (N) is B and the context (R) is D::getX.
- 'x' as a member of B is protected, but R does not occur
in a member or friend of a class derived from B.
- There does exist a base class of B, A, which is accessible
from R, and 'x' is accessible at R when named in A because
'x' as a member of A is protected and R occurs in a member
of a class, D, that is derived from A; however, by
[class.protected], the class of the object expression must
be equal to or derived from that class, and A does not
derive from D.
llvm-svn: 175858
MSVC accepts this:
class A {
A::A();
};
Clang accepts regular member functions with extra qualification as an MS
extension, but not constructors. This changes the parser to defer rejecting
qualified constructors so that the same Sema logic can apply to constructors as
regular member functions. This also improves the error message when MS
extensions are disabled (in my opinion). Before it was:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:8: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
A::A();
~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
After:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:6: error: extra qualification on member 'A'
A::A();
~~~^
1 error generated.
Patch by Jason Haslam.
llvm-svn: 174980
have a direct mismatch between some component of the template and some
component of the argument. The diagnostic now says what the mismatch was, but
doesn't yet say which part of the template doesn't match.
llvm-svn: 174039
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
This required plumbing through a new flag to determine whether a ParmVarDecl is
actually a parameter of a function declaration (as opposed to a function
typedef etc, where the attribute is prohibited). Weirdly, this attribute (just
like [[noreturn]]) cannot be applied to a function type, just to a function
declaration (and its parameters).
llvm-svn: 173726
and split it out of -Wgnu into its own warning flag.
* In C++11, this is now a hard error (GCC has no extension here in C++11 mode).
The error can be disabled with -Wno-static-float-init, and has a fixit to
add 'constexpr'.
* In C++98, this is still an ExtWarn, but is now controlled by
-Wstatic-float-init as well as -Wgnu.
llvm-svn: 173414
This is a missing piece for C99 conformance.
This patch handles UCNs by adding a '\\' case to LexTokenInternal and
LexIdentifier -- if we see a backslash, we tentatively try to read in a UCN.
If the UCN is not syntactically well-formed, we fall back to the old
treatment: a backslash followed by an identifier beginning with 'u' (or 'U').
Because the spelling of an identifier with UCNs still has the UCN in it, we
need to convert that to UTF-8 in Preprocessor::LookUpIdentifierInfo.
Of course, valid code that does *not* use UCNs will see only a very minimal
performance hit (checks after each identifier for non-ASCII characters,
checks when converting raw_identifiers to identifiers that they do not
contain UCNs, and checks when getting the spelling of an identifier that it
does not contain a UCN).
This patch also adds basic support for actual UTF-8 in the source. This is
treated almost exactly the same as UCNs except that we consider stray
Unicode characters to be mistakes and offer a fixit to remove them.
llvm-svn: 173369
partially-substituted parameter pack in a template, forget about the
partially-substituted parameter pack: it is now completed. Fixes
<rdar://problem/12176336>.
llvm-svn: 172859
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
Set invalid type of declarator after emitting error diagnostics,
so that it won't be later considered when instantiating the template.
Added test5_inst in test/SemaCXX/condition.cpp for non-regression.
llvm-svn: 172201
definition, rather than at the end of the definition of the set of nested
classes. We still defer checking of the user-specified exception specification
to the end of the nesting -- we can't check that until we've parsed the
in-class initializers for non-static data members.
llvm-svn: 169805
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.
This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.
This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.
llvm-svn: 169667
properly, rather than faking it up by pretending that a reference member makes
the default constructor non-trivial. That leads to rejects-valids when putting
such types inside unions.
llvm-svn: 169662
Don't require that, during template deduction, a template specialization type
as a function parameter has at least as many template arguments as one used in
a function argument (not even if the argument has been resolved to an exact
type); the additional parameters might be provided by default template
arguments in the template. We don't need this check, since we now implement
[temp.deduct.call]p4 with an additional check after deduction.
llvm-svn: 169475
string literal needs cleaning (because it contains line-splicing in the
encoding prefix or in the ud-suffix), do not clean the section between the
double-quotes -- that's the "raw" bit!
llvm-svn: 168776
constructor/assignment operator with a const-qualified parameter type. The
prior method for determining this incorrectly used overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 168775
Nick Lewycky