The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Summary:
The goal of this patch is to make `-verify` easier to use when testing libc++. The `notes` attached to compile error diagnostics are numerous and relatively unstable when they reference libc++ header internals. This patch allows libc++ to write stable compilation failure tests by allowing unexpected diagnostic messages to be ignored where they are not relevant.
This patch adds a new CC1 flag called `-verify-ignore-unexpected`. `-verify-ignore-unexpected` tells `VerifyDiagnosticsConsumer` to ignore *all* unexpected diagnostic messages. `-verify-ignore-unexpected=<LevelList>` can be used to only ignore certain diagnostic levels. `<LevelList>` is a comma separated list of diagnostic levels to ignore. The supported levels are `note`, `remark`, `warning` and `error`.
Reviewers: bogner, grosser, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10138
llvm-svn: 239665
Summary:
Make DiagnosticsEngine::takeClient return std::unique_ptr<>. Updated
callers to store conditional ownership using a pair of pointer and unique_ptr
instead of a pointer + bool. Updated code that temporarily registers clients to
use the non-owning registration (+ removed extra calls to takeClient).
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6294
llvm-svn: 222193
#include_next interacts poorly with modules: it depends on where in the list of
include paths the current file was found. Files covered by module maps are not
found in include search paths when building the module (and are not found in
include search paths when @importing the module either), so this isn't really
meaningful. Instead, we fake up the result that #include_next *should* have
given: find the first path that would have resulted in the given file being
picked, and search from there onwards.
llvm-svn: 220177
Allow diagnostic checks that originate in included files to be matched without necessarily determining the line number that the diagnostic occurs on. The new syntax replaces the line number with '*'. This extension is limited to diagnostics in included files and may be used where the include file is not part of the test-suite itself.
Expected uses are for diagnostics originating in system headers, or for users who use -verify in testing 3rd-party library code where the location of diagnostics in header files may change from revision to revision and their precise location is not important to the success of the test-case.
llvm-svn: 212735
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
Before this patch, Lex() would recurse whenever the current lexer changed (e.g.
upon entry into a macro). This patch turns the recursion into a loop: the
various lex routines now don't return a token when the current lexer changes,
and at the top level Preprocessor::Lex() now loops until it finds a token.
Normally, the recursion wouldn't end up being very deep, but the recursion depth
can explode in edge cases like a bunch of consecutive macros which expand to
nothing (like in the testcase test/Preprocessor/macro_expand_empty.c in this
patch).
<rdar://problem/14569770>
llvm-svn: 190980
Basically, isInMainFile considers line markers, and isWrittenInMainFile
doesn't. Distinguishing between the two is useful when dealing with
files which are preprocessed files or rewritten with -frewrite-includes
(so we don't, for example, print useless warnings).
llvm-svn: 188968
Previously, we would clone the current diagnostic consumer to produce
a new diagnostic consumer to use when building a module. The problem
here is that we end up losing diagnostics for important diagnostic
consumers, such as serialized diagnostics (where we'd end up with two
diagnostic consumers writing the same output file). With forwarding,
the diagnostics from all of the different modules being built get
forwarded to the one serialized-diagnostic consumer and are emitted in
a sane way.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13663996>.
llvm-svn: 181067
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
This change was initially proposed as a solution to the problem highlighted by check-in r164677, i.e. that -verify will not cause a test-case failure where the compile command does not actually reference the file.
Patch reviewed by David Blaikie.
llvm-svn: 166281
In Debug builds, VerifyDiagnosticConsumer checks any files with diagnostics
to make sure we got the chance to parse them for directives (expected-warning
and friends). This check previously relied on every parsed file having a
FileEntry, which broke the cling interpreter's test suite.
This commit changes the extra debug checking to mark a file as unparsed
as soon as we see a diagnostic from that file. At the very end, any files
that are still marked as unparsed are checked for directives, and a fatal
error is emitted (as before) if we find out that there were directives we
missed. -verify directives should always live in actual parsed files, not
in PCH or AST files.
Patch by Andy Gibbs, with slight modifications by me.
llvm-svn: 162171
The old behavior was to re-scan any files (like modules) where we may have
directives but won't actually be parsing during the -verify invocation.
Now, we keep the old behavior in Debug builds as a sanity check (though
modules are a known entity), and expect all legitimate directives to come
from comments seen by the preprocessor.
This also affects the ARC migration tool, which captures diagnostics in
order to filter some out. This change adds an explicit cleanup to
CaptureDiagnosticsConsumer in order to let its sub-consumer handle the
real end of diagnostics.
This was originally split into four patches, but the tests do not run
cleanly without all four, so I've combined them into one commit.
Patches by Andy Gibbs, with slight modifications from me.
llvm-svn: 161650
This is accomplished by making VerifyDiagnosticsConsumer a CommentHandler,
which then only reads the -verify directives that are actually in live
blocks of code. It also makes it simpler to handle -verify directives that
appear in header files, though we still have to manually reparse some files
depending on how they are generated.
This requires some test changes. In particular, all PCH tests now have their
-verify directives outside the "header" portion of the file, using the @line
syntax added in r159978. Other tests have been modified mostly to make it
clear what is being tested, and to prevent polluting the expected output with
the directives themselves.
Patch by Andy Gibbs! (with slight modifications)
The new Frontend/verify-* tests exercise the functionality of this commit,
as well as r159978, r159979, and r160053 (Andy's other -verify enhancements).
llvm-svn: 160068
Previously we'd halt at the fatal error as expected, but not actually emit
any -verify-related diagnostics. This lets us catch cases that emit a
/different/ fatal error from the one we expected.
This is implemented by adding a "force emit" mode to DiagnosticBuilder, which
will cause diagnostics to immediately be emitted regardless of current
suppression. Needless to say this should probably be used /very/ sparingly.
Patch by Andy Gibbs! Tests for all of Andy's -verify patches coming soon.
llvm-svn: 160053
void f(); // expected-note 0+ {{previous declaration is here}}
void g(); // expected-note 0-1 {{previous declaration is here}}
The old "+" syntax is still an alias for "1+", and single numbers still work.
Patch by Andy Gibbs!
llvm-svn: 159979
// expected-warning@10 {{some text}}
The line number may be absolute (as above), or relative to the current
line by prefixing the number with either '+' or '-'.
Patch by Andy Gibbs!
llvm-svn: 159978
It had been causing test "Misc/diag-verify.cpp" failure on ms cl.exe. The emission was ordered unexpectedly as below;
First) error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
Second) error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
llvm-svn: 146830
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
Alexander Kornienko