Since C++11, the C++ standard has a forward progress guarantee
[intro.progress], so all such functions must have the `mustprogress`
requirement. In addition, from C11 and onwards, loops without a non-zero
constant conditional or no conditional are also required to make
progress (C11 6.8.5p6). This patch implements these attribute deductions
so they can be used by the optimization passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86841
Amongst other, this will help LTO to correctly handle/honor files
compiled with O0, helping debugging failures.
It also seems in line with how we handle other options, like how
-fnoinline adds the appropriate attribute as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28404
llvm-svn: 304127
-fno-inline-functions, -O0, and optnone.
These were really, really tangled together:
- We used the noinline LLVM attribute for -fno-inline
- But not for -fno-inline-functions (breaking LTO)
- But we did use it for -finline-hint-functions (yay, LTO is happy!)
- But we didn't for -O0 (LTO is sad yet again...)
- We had weird structuring of CodeGenOpts with both an inlining
enumeration and a boolean. They interacted in weird ways and
needlessly.
- A *lot* of set smashing went on with setting these, and then got worse
when we considered optnone and other inlining-effecting attributes.
- A bunch of inline affecting attributes were managed in a completely
different place from -fno-inline.
- Even with -fno-inline we failed to put the LLVM noinline attribute
onto many generated function definitions because they didn't show up
as AST-level functions.
- If you passed -O0 but -finline-functions we would run the normal
inliner pass in LLVM despite it being in the O0 pipeline, which really
doesn't make much sense.
- Lastly, we used things like '-fno-inline' to manipulate the pass
pipeline which forced the pass pipeline to be much more
parameterizable than it really needs to be. Instead we can *just* use
the optimization level to select a pipeline and control the rest via
attributes.
Sadly, this causes a bunch of churn in tests because we don't run the
optimizer in the tests and check the contents of attribute sets. It
would be awesome if attribute sets were a bit more FileCheck friendly,
but oh well.
I think this is a significant improvement and should remove the semantic
need to change what inliner pass we run in order to comply with the
requested inlining semantics by relying completely on attributes. It
also cleans up tho optnone and related handling a bit.
One unfortunate aspect of this is that for generating alwaysinline
routines like those in OpenMP we end up removing noinline and then
adding alwaysinline. I tried a bunch of other approaches, but because we
recompute function attributes from scratch and don't have a declaration
here I couldn't find anything substantially cleaner than this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28053
llvm-svn: 290398
Tests fall into one of the following categories:
- The requirement was unnecessary
- Additional quoting was required for backslashes in paths (see "sed -e
's/\\/\\\\/g'") in the sanitizer tests.
- OpenMP used 'REQUIRES: shell' as a proxy for the test failing on
Windows. Those tests fail there reliably, so use XFAIL instead.
I tried not to remove shell requirements that were added to suppress
flaky test failures, but if I screwed up, we can add it back as needed.
llvm-svn: 284793
When SanitizerBlacklist decides if the SourceLocation is blacklisted,
we need to first turn it into a SpellingLoc before fetching the filename
and scanning "src:" entries. Otherwise we will fail to fecth the
correct filename for function definitions coming from macro expansion.
llvm-svn: 220403
This commit changes the way we blacklist functions in ASan, TSan,
MSan and UBSan. We used to treat function as "blacklisted"
and turned off instrumentation in it in two cases:
1) Function is explicitly blacklisted by its mangled name.
This part is not changed.
2) Function is located in llvm::Module, whose identifier is
contained in the list of blacklisted sources. This is completely
wrong, as llvm::Module may not correspond to the actual source
file function is defined in. Also, function can be defined in
a header, in which case user had to blacklist the .cpp file
this header was #include'd into, not the header itself.
Such functions could cause other problems - for instance, if the
header was included in multiple source files, compiled
separately and linked into a single executable, we could end up
with both instrumented and non-instrumented version of the same
function participating in the same link.
After this change we will make blacklisting decision based on
the SourceLocation of a function definition. If a function is
not explicitly defined in the source file, (for example, the
function is compiler-generated and responsible for
initialization/destruction of a global variable), then it will
be blacklisted if the corresponding global variable is defined
in blacklisted source file, and will be instrumented otherwise.
After this commit, the active users of blacklist files may have
to revisit them. This is a backwards-incompatible change, but
I don't think it's possible or makes sense to support the
old incorrect behavior.
I plan to make similar change for blacklisting GlobalVariables
(which is ASan-specific).
llvm-svn: 219997
These are two related changes (one in llvm, one in clang).
LLVM:
- rename address_safety => sanitize_address (the enum value is the same, so we preserve binary compatibility with old bitcode)
- rename thread_safety => sanitize_thread
- rename no_uninitialized_checks -> sanitize_memory
CLANG:
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) as a synonym for __attribute__((no_address_safety_analysis))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_thread))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_memory))
for S in address thread memory
If -fsanitize=S is present and __attribute__((no_sanitize_S)) is not
set llvm attribute sanitize_S
llvm-svn: 176076
checks to enable. Remove frontend support for -fcatch-undefined-behavior,
-faddress-sanitizer and -fthread-sanitizer now that they don't do anything.
llvm-svn: 167413
address safety analysis (such as e.g. AddressSanitizer or SAFECode) for a specific function.
When building with AddressSanitizer, add AddressSafety function attribute to every generated function
except for those that have __attribute__((no_address_safety_analysis)).
With this patch we will be able to
1. disable AddressSanitizer for a particular function
2. disable AddressSanitizer-hostile optimizations (such as some cases of load widening) when AddressSanitizer is on.
llvm-svn: 148842
Atmn Patel