Depends On D95000
Move async.execute outlining and async -> async.runtime lowering into the separate Async transformation pass
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95311
Instead of using llvm.call operations to call LLVM coro intrinsics use Coro operations from the LLVM dialect.
(This was reviewed as a part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D94923 but was lost in arc land from local branch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95405
[NFC] No new functionality, mostly a cleanup and one more abstraction level between Async and LLVM IR.
Instead of lowering from Async to LLVM coroutines and Async Runtime API in one shot, do it progressively via async.coro and async.runtime operations.
1. Lower from async to async.runtime/coro (e.g. async.execute to function with coro setup and runtime calls)
2. Lower from async.runtime/coro to LLVM intrinsics and runtime API calls
Intermediate coro/runtime operations will allow to run transformations on a higher level IR and do not try to match IR based on the LLVM::CallOp properties.
Although async.coro is very close to LLVM coroutines, it is not exactly the same API, instead it is optimized for usability in async lowering, and misses a lot of details that are present in @llvm.coro intrinsic.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94923
Lowering of async dialect uses a fixed type converter and therefore does not support lowering non-standard types.
This revision adds a structural conversion so that non-standard types in `!async.value`s can be lowered to LLVM before lowering the async dialect itself.
Reviewed By: ezhulenev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94404
Continue the convergence between LLVM dialect and built-in types by replacing
the bfloat, half, float and double LLVM dialect types with their built-in
counterparts. At the API level, this is a direct replacement. At the syntax
level, we change the keywords to `bf16`, `f16`, `f32` and `f64`, respectively,
to be compatible with the built-in type syntax. The old keywords can still be
parsed but produce a deprecation warning and will be eventually removed.
Depends On D94178
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, silvas, antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94179
The LLVM dialect type system has been closed until now, i.e. did not support
types from other dialects inside containers. While this has had obvious
benefits of deriving from a common base class, it has led to some simple types
being almost identical with the built-in types, namely integer and floating
point types. This in turn has led to a lot of larger-scale complexity: simple
types must still be converted, numerous operations that correspond to LLVM IR
intrinsics are replicated to produce versions operating on either LLVM dialect
or built-in types leading to quasi-duplicate dialects, lowering to the LLVM
dialect is essentially required to be one-shot because of type conversion, etc.
In this light, it is reasonable to trade off some local complexity in the
internal implementation of LLVM dialect types for removing larger-scale system
complexity. Previous commits to the LLVM dialect type system have adapted the
API to support types from other dialects.
Replace LLVMIntegerType with the built-in IntegerType plus additional checks
that such types are signless (these are isolated in a utility function that
replaced `isa<LLVMType>` and in the parser). Temporarily keep the possibility
to parse `!llvm.i32` as a synonym for `i32`, but add a deprecation notice.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, silvas, antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94178
BEGIN_PUBLIC
[mlir] Remove LLVMType, LLVM dialect types now derive Type directly
This class has become a simple `isa` hook with no proper functionality.
Removing will allow us to eventually make the LLVM dialect type infrastructure
open, i.e., support non-LLVM types inside container types, which itself will
make the type conversion more progressive.
Introduce a call `LLVM::isCompatibleType` to be used instead of
`isa<LLVMType>`. For now, this is strictly equivalent.
END_PUBLIC
Depends On D93681
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93713
1. Add new methods to Async runtime API to support yielding async values
2. Add lowering from `async.yield` with value payload to the new runtime API calls
`async.value` lowering requires that payload type is convertible to LLVM and supported by `llvm.mlir.cast` (DialectCast) operation.
Reviewed By: csigg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93592
LLVMType contains numerous static constructors that were initially introduced
for API compatibility with LLVM. Most of these merely forward to arguments to
`SpecificType::get` (MLIR defines classes for all types, unlike LLVM IR), while
some introduce subtle semantics differences due to different modeling of MLIR
types (e.g., structs are not auto-renamed in case of conflicts). Furthermore,
these constructors don't match MLIR idioms and actively prevent us from making
the LLVM dialect type system more open. Remove them and use `SpecificType::get`
instead.
Depends On D93680
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93681
One common situation is to create a lot of IR at a well known location,
e.g. when doing a big rewrite from one dialect to another where you're expanding
ops out into lots of other ops.
For these sorts of situations, it is annoying to pass the location into
every create call. As we discused in a few threads on the forum, a way to help
with this is to produce a new sort of builder that holds a location and provides
it to each of the create<> calls automatically.
This patch implements an ImplicitLocOpBuilder class that does this. We've had
good experience with this in the CIRCT project, and it makes sense to upstream to
MLIR.
I picked a random pass to adopt it to show the impact, but I don't think there is
any particular need to force adopt it in the codebase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93717
LLVMType contains multiple instance methods that were introduced initially for
compatibility with LLVM API. These methods boil down to `cast` followed by
type-specific call. Arguably, they are mostly used in an LLVM cast-follows-isa
anti-pattern. This doesn't connect nicely to the rest of the MLIR
infrastructure and actively prevents it from making the LLVM dialect type
system more open, e.g., reusing built-in types when appropriate. Remove such
instance methods and replaces their uses with apporpriate casts and methods on
derived classes. In some cases, the result may look slightly more verbose, but
most cases should actually use a stricter subtype of LLVMType anyway and avoid
the isa/cast.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93680
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure, is much simpler, and makes it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93432
This is needed so a listener hears all changes during the dialect
conversion to allow correct rollbacks upon failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92685
Depends On D89963
**Automatic reference counting algorithm outline:**
1. `ReturnLike` operations forward the reference counted values without
modifying the reference count.
2. Use liveness analysis to find blocks in the CFG where the lifetime of
reference counted values ends, and insert `drop_ref` operations after
the last use of the value.
3. Insert `add_ref` before the `async.execute` operation capturing the
value, and pairing `drop_ref` before the async body region terminator,
to release the captured reference counted value when execution
completes.
4. If the reference counted value is passed only to some of the block
successors, insert `drop_ref` operations in the beginning of the blocks
that do not have reference coutned value uses.
Reviewed By: silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90716
Null types are commonly used as an error marker. Catch them in the constructor
of Operation if they are present in the result type list, as otherwise this
could lead to further surprising behavior when querying op result types.
Fix AsyncToLLVM and StandardToLLVM that were using null types when constructing
operations.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91770
Depends On D89958
1. Adds `async.group`/`async.awaitall` to group together multiple async tokens/values
2. Rewrite scf.parallel operation into multiple concurrent async.execute operations over non overlapping subranges of the original loop.
Example:
```
scf.for (%i, %j) = (%lbi, %lbj) to (%ubi, %ubj) step (%si, %sj) {
"do_some_compute"(%i, %j): () -> ()
}
```
Converted to:
```
%c0 = constant 0 : index
%c1 = constant 1 : index
// Compute blocks sizes for each induction variable.
%num_blocks_i = ... : index
%num_blocks_j = ... : index
%block_size_i = ... : index
%block_size_j = ... : index
// Create an async group to track async execute ops.
%group = async.create_group
scf.for %bi = %c0 to %num_blocks_i step %c1 {
%block_start_i = ... : index
%block_end_i = ... : index
scf.for %bj = %c0 t0 %num_blocks_j step %c1 {
%block_start_j = ... : index
%block_end_j = ... : index
// Execute the body of original parallel operation for the current
// block.
%token = async.execute {
scf.for %i = %block_start_i to %block_end_i step %si {
scf.for %j = %block_start_j to %block_end_j step %sj {
"do_some_compute"(%i, %j): () -> ()
}
}
}
// Add produced async token to the group.
async.add_to_group %token, %group
}
}
// Await completion of all async.execute operations.
async.await_all %group
```
In this example outer loop launches inner block level loops as separate async
execute operations which will be executed concurrently.
At the end it waits for the completiom of all async execute operations.
Reviewed By: ftynse, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89963
This class represents a rewrite pattern list that has been frozen, and thus immutable. This replaces the uses of OwningRewritePatternList in pattern driver related API, such as dialect conversion. When PDL becomes more prevalent, this API will allow for optimizing a set of patterns once without the need to do this per run of a pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89104
This reverts commit 4986d5eaff with
proper patches to CMakeLists.txt:
- Add MLIRAsync as a dependency to MLIRAsyncToLLVM
- Add Coroutines as a dependency to MLIRExecutionEngine
Lower from Async dialect to LLVM by converting async regions attached to `async.execute` operations into LLVM coroutines (https://llvm.org/docs/Coroutines.html):
1. Outline all async regions to functions
2. Add LLVM coro intrinsics to mark coroutine begin/end
3. Use MLIR conversion framework to convert all remaining async types and ops to LLVM + Async runtime function calls
All `async.await` operations inside async regions converted to coroutine suspension points. Await operation outside of a coroutine converted to the blocking wait operations.
Implement simple runtime to support concurrent execution of coroutines.
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89292
Alex Zinenko